Ranks of research priorities among gender-diverse participants (n = 51; 140 responses).
Code . | Rank . | Frequency (n and %) . |
---|---|---|
Psychological General | 1 | 34 (24.3%) |
Relationship General | 2 | 26 (18.6%) |
Biophysiological General | 3 | 20 (14.3%) |
Biophysiological Cause | 4 | 19 (13.6%) |
Relationship Treatment | 5 | 17 (12.1%) |
General Treatment and Coping | 6 | 14 (10.0%) |
General Causes | 7 | 12 (8.6%) |
Psychological Cause | 8 | 11 (7.9%) |
Environmental/Contextual Cause | 9 | 10 (7.1%) |
Environmental/Contextual General | 10 | 9 (6.4%) |
Relationship Impact | 11 | 8 (5.7%) |
Relationship Cause | 12 | 6 (4.3%) |
Psychological Treatment | 13 | 5 (3.6%) |
Biophysiological Treatment | 14 | 3 (2.1%) |
Psychological Impact | 15 | 1 (0.7%) |
Environmental/Contextual Treatment | 16 | 0 (0.0%) |
Biophysiological Impact | 17 | 0 (0.0%) |
Environmental/Contextual Impact | 18 | 0 (0.0%) |
Code . | Rank . | Frequency (n and %) . |
---|---|---|
Psychological General | 1 | 34 (24.3%) |
Relationship General | 2 | 26 (18.6%) |
Biophysiological General | 3 | 20 (14.3%) |
Biophysiological Cause | 4 | 19 (13.6%) |
Relationship Treatment | 5 | 17 (12.1%) |
General Treatment and Coping | 6 | 14 (10.0%) |
General Causes | 7 | 12 (8.6%) |
Psychological Cause | 8 | 11 (7.9%) |
Environmental/Contextual Cause | 9 | 10 (7.1%) |
Environmental/Contextual General | 10 | 9 (6.4%) |
Relationship Impact | 11 | 8 (5.7%) |
Relationship Cause | 12 | 6 (4.3%) |
Psychological Treatment | 13 | 5 (3.6%) |
Biophysiological Treatment | 14 | 3 (2.1%) |
Psychological Impact | 15 | 1 (0.7%) |
Environmental/Contextual Treatment | 16 | 0 (0.0%) |
Biophysiological Impact | 17 | 0 (0.0%) |
Environmental/Contextual Impact | 18 | 0 (0.0%) |
Note. Gender-diverse refers to any participants who are identified as an Indigenous gender identity (eg, Two-Spirit), non-binary, transgender, or another gender identity other than exclusively cisgender man or woman. Some responses were coded under more than one theme. Percentages reflect how many codes belong to each theme out of the total number of codes for gender-diverse participants.
Ranks of research priorities among gender-diverse participants (n = 51; 140 responses).
Code . | Rank . | Frequency (n and %) . |
---|---|---|
Psychological General | 1 | 34 (24.3%) |
Relationship General | 2 | 26 (18.6%) |
Biophysiological General | 3 | 20 (14.3%) |
Biophysiological Cause | 4 | 19 (13.6%) |
Relationship Treatment | 5 | 17 (12.1%) |
General Treatment and Coping | 6 | 14 (10.0%) |
General Causes | 7 | 12 (8.6%) |
Psychological Cause | 8 | 11 (7.9%) |
Environmental/Contextual Cause | 9 | 10 (7.1%) |
Environmental/Contextual General | 10 | 9 (6.4%) |
Relationship Impact | 11 | 8 (5.7%) |
Relationship Cause | 12 | 6 (4.3%) |
Psychological Treatment | 13 | 5 (3.6%) |
Biophysiological Treatment | 14 | 3 (2.1%) |
Psychological Impact | 15 | 1 (0.7%) |
Environmental/Contextual Treatment | 16 | 0 (0.0%) |
Biophysiological Impact | 17 | 0 (0.0%) |
Environmental/Contextual Impact | 18 | 0 (0.0%) |
Code . | Rank . | Frequency (n and %) . |
---|---|---|
Psychological General | 1 | 34 (24.3%) |
Relationship General | 2 | 26 (18.6%) |
Biophysiological General | 3 | 20 (14.3%) |
Biophysiological Cause | 4 | 19 (13.6%) |
Relationship Treatment | 5 | 17 (12.1%) |
General Treatment and Coping | 6 | 14 (10.0%) |
General Causes | 7 | 12 (8.6%) |
Psychological Cause | 8 | 11 (7.9%) |
Environmental/Contextual Cause | 9 | 10 (7.1%) |
Environmental/Contextual General | 10 | 9 (6.4%) |
Relationship Impact | 11 | 8 (5.7%) |
Relationship Cause | 12 | 6 (4.3%) |
Psychological Treatment | 13 | 5 (3.6%) |
Biophysiological Treatment | 14 | 3 (2.1%) |
Psychological Impact | 15 | 1 (0.7%) |
Environmental/Contextual Treatment | 16 | 0 (0.0%) |
Biophysiological Impact | 17 | 0 (0.0%) |
Environmental/Contextual Impact | 18 | 0 (0.0%) |
Note. Gender-diverse refers to any participants who are identified as an Indigenous gender identity (eg, Two-Spirit), non-binary, transgender, or another gender identity other than exclusively cisgender man or woman. Some responses were coded under more than one theme. Percentages reflect how many codes belong to each theme out of the total number of codes for gender-diverse participants.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.