Table 2

Results of the interrupted time series analysis of the impact of the PAD guideline on annual admission rates for revascularization for PAD; England (1 April 2008–31 March 2018)

Estimate
(admissions per 100 000 population per year)
95% c.i.P
Revascularization for moderate PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)50.05(48.38,51.72)<0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)0.29(−0.22,0.80)0.30
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.90(−0.16,3.96)0.12
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−2.81(−3.52,−2.10)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−10.7
  Relative change (%)−20.8%
Revascularization for severe PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)32.36(30.52,34.20)< 0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)1.33(0.78,1.88)<0.001
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.89(−0.38,4.16)0.16
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−1.95(−2.73,−1.17)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−1.2
  Relative change (%)−3.1%
Estimate
(admissions per 100 000 population per year)
95% c.i.P
Revascularization for moderate PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)50.05(48.38,51.72)<0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)0.29(−0.22,0.80)0.30
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.90(−0.16,3.96)0.12
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−2.81(−3.52,−2.10)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−10.7
  Relative change (%)−20.8%
Revascularization for severe PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)32.36(30.52,34.20)< 0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)1.33(0.78,1.88)<0.001
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.89(−0.38,4.16)0.16
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−1.95(−2.73,−1.17)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−1.2
  Relative change (%)−3.1%

PAD, peripheral arterial disease.

Table 2

Results of the interrupted time series analysis of the impact of the PAD guideline on annual admission rates for revascularization for PAD; England (1 April 2008–31 March 2018)

Estimate
(admissions per 100 000 population per year)
95% c.i.P
Revascularization for moderate PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)50.05(48.38,51.72)<0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)0.29(−0.22,0.80)0.30
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.90(−0.16,3.96)0.12
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−2.81(−3.52,−2.10)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−10.7
  Relative change (%)−20.8%
Revascularization for severe PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)32.36(30.52,34.20)< 0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)1.33(0.78,1.88)<0.001
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.89(−0.38,4.16)0.16
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−1.95(−2.73,−1.17)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−1.2
  Relative change (%)−3.1%
Estimate
(admissions per 100 000 population per year)
95% c.i.P
Revascularization for moderate PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)50.05(48.38,51.72)<0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)0.29(−0.22,0.80)0.30
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.90(−0.16,3.96)0.12
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−2.81(−3.52,−2.10)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−10.7
  Relative change (%)−20.8%
Revascularization for severe PAD
 Intercept (admission rate in 2008–2009)32.36(30.52,34.20)< 0.001
 Trend before the guideline (annual increase in admission rate from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013)1.33(0.78,1.88)<0.001
 Level change after the guideline (step change in rate in 2013–2014)1.89(−0.38,4.16)0.16
 Change in trend after the guideline (annual change in trend from 2013–2014 to 2017–2018)−1.95(−2.73,−1.17)<0.001
 Change in admission rate: 2017–2018 compared with 2012–2013
(calculated using above results)
  Absolute change (admissions per 100 000 population per year)−1.2
  Relative change (%)−3.1%

PAD, peripheral arterial disease.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close