. | Long difference of manufacturing employment, OLS . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
Denmark . | Finland . | Germany . | Italy . | Norway . | Spain . | Sweden . | United Kingdom . | |
Exposure to robots (instrument) | 1.815 | −0.565 | −0.206** | −0.071 | −0.512 | −0.131 | −0.077 | −0.500** |
(1.163) | (0.933) | (0.103) | (0.272) | (1.201) | (0.103) | (0.388) | (0.198) | |
Exposure to Chinese imports, intermediate goods | 0.123 | 0.648 | −0.292* | −1.256* | −0.140 | −0.713 | 1.159 | −4.356*** |
(1.640) | (0.470) | (0.159) | (0.653) | (0.681) | (0.820) | (1.915) | (0.723) | |
Exposure to robots × intermediate goods | −3.770 | 0.073 | 0.118** | −0.284 | 0.064 | −0.165 | −0.368 | 0.460 |
(2.297) | (0.489) | (0.056) | (0.298) | (1.107) | (0.196) | (0.842) | (0.279) | |
Sum of robot exposure coefficients | −1.955 | −0.492 | −0.088* | −0.355*** | −0.447* | −0.295** | −0.445 | −0.040 |
(1.319) | (0.641) | (0.050) | (0.084) | (0.255) | (0.139) | (0.528) | (0.117) | |
R-squared | 0.499 | 0.621 | 0.387 | 0.884 | 0.339 | 0.976 | 0.448 | 0.636 |
Observations | 99 | 70 | 319 | 110 | 74 | 49 | 100 | 352 |
Regional FE | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Baseline controls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
. | Long difference of manufacturing employment, OLS . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
Denmark . | Finland . | Germany . | Italy . | Norway . | Spain . | Sweden . | United Kingdom . | |
Exposure to robots (instrument) | 1.815 | −0.565 | −0.206** | −0.071 | −0.512 | −0.131 | −0.077 | −0.500** |
(1.163) | (0.933) | (0.103) | (0.272) | (1.201) | (0.103) | (0.388) | (0.198) | |
Exposure to Chinese imports, intermediate goods | 0.123 | 0.648 | −0.292* | −1.256* | −0.140 | −0.713 | 1.159 | −4.356*** |
(1.640) | (0.470) | (0.159) | (0.653) | (0.681) | (0.820) | (1.915) | (0.723) | |
Exposure to robots × intermediate goods | −3.770 | 0.073 | 0.118** | −0.284 | 0.064 | −0.165 | −0.368 | 0.460 |
(2.297) | (0.489) | (0.056) | (0.298) | (1.107) | (0.196) | (0.842) | (0.279) | |
Sum of robot exposure coefficients | −1.955 | −0.492 | −0.088* | −0.355*** | −0.447* | −0.295** | −0.445 | −0.040 |
(1.319) | (0.641) | (0.050) | (0.084) | (0.255) | (0.139) | (0.528) | (0.117) | |
R-squared | 0.499 | 0.621 | 0.387 | 0.884 | 0.339 | 0.976 | 0.448 | 0.636 |
Observations | 99 | 70 | 319 | 110 | 74 | 49 | 100 | 352 |
Regional FE | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Baseline controls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
This table presents OLS estimates of the impact of the exposure with the interaction with the exposure to Chinese imports of intermediate or final goods. The measurement of robot exposure is an instrumental variable. The outcome variables are the long difference in manufacturing employment-to-population ratio. Regressions are weighted by population in the start-of-period. The list of covariates is documented in Appendix A. The missing geographic and industry values in Germany are due to confidentiality-related data limitations. Statistical significance based on robust standard errors (reported in parentheses) is denoted by ***P < 0.01, **P < 0.05, and *P < 0.10.
. | Long difference of manufacturing employment, OLS . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
Denmark . | Finland . | Germany . | Italy . | Norway . | Spain . | Sweden . | United Kingdom . | |
Exposure to robots (instrument) | 1.815 | −0.565 | −0.206** | −0.071 | −0.512 | −0.131 | −0.077 | −0.500** |
(1.163) | (0.933) | (0.103) | (0.272) | (1.201) | (0.103) | (0.388) | (0.198) | |
Exposure to Chinese imports, intermediate goods | 0.123 | 0.648 | −0.292* | −1.256* | −0.140 | −0.713 | 1.159 | −4.356*** |
(1.640) | (0.470) | (0.159) | (0.653) | (0.681) | (0.820) | (1.915) | (0.723) | |
Exposure to robots × intermediate goods | −3.770 | 0.073 | 0.118** | −0.284 | 0.064 | −0.165 | −0.368 | 0.460 |
(2.297) | (0.489) | (0.056) | (0.298) | (1.107) | (0.196) | (0.842) | (0.279) | |
Sum of robot exposure coefficients | −1.955 | −0.492 | −0.088* | −0.355*** | −0.447* | −0.295** | −0.445 | −0.040 |
(1.319) | (0.641) | (0.050) | (0.084) | (0.255) | (0.139) | (0.528) | (0.117) | |
R-squared | 0.499 | 0.621 | 0.387 | 0.884 | 0.339 | 0.976 | 0.448 | 0.636 |
Observations | 99 | 70 | 319 | 110 | 74 | 49 | 100 | 352 |
Regional FE | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Baseline controls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
. | Long difference of manufacturing employment, OLS . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . | (8) . |
Denmark . | Finland . | Germany . | Italy . | Norway . | Spain . | Sweden . | United Kingdom . | |
Exposure to robots (instrument) | 1.815 | −0.565 | −0.206** | −0.071 | −0.512 | −0.131 | −0.077 | −0.500** |
(1.163) | (0.933) | (0.103) | (0.272) | (1.201) | (0.103) | (0.388) | (0.198) | |
Exposure to Chinese imports, intermediate goods | 0.123 | 0.648 | −0.292* | −1.256* | −0.140 | −0.713 | 1.159 | −4.356*** |
(1.640) | (0.470) | (0.159) | (0.653) | (0.681) | (0.820) | (1.915) | (0.723) | |
Exposure to robots × intermediate goods | −3.770 | 0.073 | 0.118** | −0.284 | 0.064 | −0.165 | −0.368 | 0.460 |
(2.297) | (0.489) | (0.056) | (0.298) | (1.107) | (0.196) | (0.842) | (0.279) | |
Sum of robot exposure coefficients | −1.955 | −0.492 | −0.088* | −0.355*** | −0.447* | −0.295** | −0.445 | −0.040 |
(1.319) | (0.641) | (0.050) | (0.084) | (0.255) | (0.139) | (0.528) | (0.117) | |
R-squared | 0.499 | 0.621 | 0.387 | 0.884 | 0.339 | 0.976 | 0.448 | 0.636 |
Observations | 99 | 70 | 319 | 110 | 74 | 49 | 100 | 352 |
Regional FE | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Baseline controls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
This table presents OLS estimates of the impact of the exposure with the interaction with the exposure to Chinese imports of intermediate or final goods. The measurement of robot exposure is an instrumental variable. The outcome variables are the long difference in manufacturing employment-to-population ratio. Regressions are weighted by population in the start-of-period. The list of covariates is documented in Appendix A. The missing geographic and industry values in Germany are due to confidentiality-related data limitations. Statistical significance based on robust standard errors (reported in parentheses) is denoted by ***P < 0.01, **P < 0.05, and *P < 0.10.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.