Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis showing optimal baseline and postinduction IUS findings associated with segmental mucosal healing at visit-2 (44-56 weeks).

UnivariableMultivariablea
Predictors (reference)OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP
Baseline IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.970.95-0.99<0.0010.970.95-0.99<0.001
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.640.48-0.850.002
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.670.48-0.940.019
Color doppler signal (absent)0.460.26-0.800.006
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.510.35-0.74<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy65.7%
 AUC0.73
Postinduction IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.940.91-0.96<0.0010.940.91-0.96<0.001
Δ IBUS-SASc0.980.97-1.000.024
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.340.22-0.52<0.001
Δ Bowel wall thickness (mm)c0.790.61-1.020.074
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.440.29-0.66<0.001
Color doppler signal (absent)0.300.18-0.52<0.001
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.140.05-0.38<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy74.3%
 AUC0.80
UnivariableMultivariablea
Predictors (reference)OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP
Baseline IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.970.95-0.99<0.0010.970.95-0.99<0.001
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.640.48-0.850.002
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.670.48-0.940.019
Color doppler signal (absent)0.460.26-0.800.006
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.510.35-0.74<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy65.7%
 AUC0.73
Postinduction IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.940.91-0.96<0.0010.940.91-0.96<0.001
Δ IBUS-SASc0.980.97-1.000.024
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.340.22-0.52<0.001
Δ Bowel wall thickness (mm)c0.790.61-1.020.074
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.440.29-0.66<0.001
Color doppler signal (absent)0.300.18-0.52<0.001
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.140.05-0.38<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy74.3%
 AUC0.80

Abbreviations: IUS, intestinal ultrasound; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IBUS-SAS, International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score; AUC, area under the curve.

aUsing the stepwise approach.

bUsing the multi-fold cross-validation (10 times 5-fold cross-validation) approach.

cChange from baseline value.

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis showing optimal baseline and postinduction IUS findings associated with segmental mucosal healing at visit-2 (44-56 weeks).

UnivariableMultivariablea
Predictors (reference)OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP
Baseline IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.970.95-0.99<0.0010.970.95-0.99<0.001
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.640.48-0.850.002
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.670.48-0.940.019
Color doppler signal (absent)0.460.26-0.800.006
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.510.35-0.74<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy65.7%
 AUC0.73
Postinduction IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.940.91-0.96<0.0010.940.91-0.96<0.001
Δ IBUS-SASc0.980.97-1.000.024
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.340.22-0.52<0.001
Δ Bowel wall thickness (mm)c0.790.61-1.020.074
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.440.29-0.66<0.001
Color doppler signal (absent)0.300.18-0.52<0.001
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.140.05-0.38<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy74.3%
 AUC0.80
UnivariableMultivariablea
Predictors (reference)OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP
Baseline IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.970.95-0.99<0.0010.970.95-0.99<0.001
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.640.48-0.850.002
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.670.48-0.940.019
Color doppler signal (absent)0.460.26-0.800.006
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.510.35-0.74<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy65.7%
 AUC0.73
Postinduction IUS findings
IBUS-SAS0.940.91-0.96<0.0010.940.91-0.96<0.001
Δ IBUS-SASc0.980.97-1.000.024
Bowel wall thickness (mm)0.340.22-0.52<0.001
Δ Bowel wall thickness (mm)c0.790.61-1.020.074
Bowel wall stratification (normal)0.440.29-0.66<0.001
Color doppler signal (absent)0.300.18-0.52<0.001
Inflammatory mesenteric fat (absent)0.140.05-0.38<0.001
Validation variablesb
 Accuracy74.3%
 AUC0.80

Abbreviations: IUS, intestinal ultrasound; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IBUS-SAS, International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score; AUC, area under the curve.

aUsing the stepwise approach.

bUsing the multi-fold cross-validation (10 times 5-fold cross-validation) approach.

cChange from baseline value.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close