Table 2:

The activity of ACP and ALP, SRL, RTD and foliar Mn2+ concentration of Populus euphratica females (F) and males (M) under different water management practices

Water managementSexACP (mg pNP kg−1 h−1)ALP (mg phenol kg−1 h−1)SRL (m g−1)RTD (g cm−3)Foliar Mn2+ (mg kg−1)
Well wateredF44.5 ± 2.0a68.8 ± 2.1a13.5 ± 1.4b0.6 ± 0.1a56.7 ± 8.2b
Water deficiencyF24.6 ± 2.1c13.8 ± 1.7c19.5 ± 0.9a0.3 ± 0.1b53.3 ± 6.3b
Well wateredM41.8 ± 2.8a80.4 ± 5.9a8.5 ± 0.9c0.6 ± 0.1a44.9 ± 3.3b
Water deficiencyM34.1 ± 3.1b28.0 ± 1.5b12.3 ± 0.8b0.5 ± 0.1a78.4 ± 8.8a
Pwater<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.05<0.05
Psex0.2<0.001<0.001<0.050.4
Pwater × sex<0.050.70.30.3<0.05
Water managementSexACP (mg pNP kg−1 h−1)ALP (mg phenol kg−1 h−1)SRL (m g−1)RTD (g cm−3)Foliar Mn2+ (mg kg−1)
Well wateredF44.5 ± 2.0a68.8 ± 2.1a13.5 ± 1.4b0.6 ± 0.1a56.7 ± 8.2b
Water deficiencyF24.6 ± 2.1c13.8 ± 1.7c19.5 ± 0.9a0.3 ± 0.1b53.3 ± 6.3b
Well wateredM41.8 ± 2.8a80.4 ± 5.9a8.5 ± 0.9c0.6 ± 0.1a44.9 ± 3.3b
Water deficiencyM34.1 ± 3.1b28.0 ± 1.5b12.3 ± 0.8b0.5 ± 0.1a78.4 ± 8.8a
Pwater<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.05<0.05
Psex0.2<0.001<0.001<0.050.4
Pwater × sex<0.050.70.30.3<0.05

Different letters in the column indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test). Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 6). Statistically significant P-values are shown in bold. Abbreviations: Psex = sex effect, Pwater = water management practices, Pwater × sex = the interaction effect of water management practices and sex.

Table 2:

The activity of ACP and ALP, SRL, RTD and foliar Mn2+ concentration of Populus euphratica females (F) and males (M) under different water management practices

Water managementSexACP (mg pNP kg−1 h−1)ALP (mg phenol kg−1 h−1)SRL (m g−1)RTD (g cm−3)Foliar Mn2+ (mg kg−1)
Well wateredF44.5 ± 2.0a68.8 ± 2.1a13.5 ± 1.4b0.6 ± 0.1a56.7 ± 8.2b
Water deficiencyF24.6 ± 2.1c13.8 ± 1.7c19.5 ± 0.9a0.3 ± 0.1b53.3 ± 6.3b
Well wateredM41.8 ± 2.8a80.4 ± 5.9a8.5 ± 0.9c0.6 ± 0.1a44.9 ± 3.3b
Water deficiencyM34.1 ± 3.1b28.0 ± 1.5b12.3 ± 0.8b0.5 ± 0.1a78.4 ± 8.8a
Pwater<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.05<0.05
Psex0.2<0.001<0.001<0.050.4
Pwater × sex<0.050.70.30.3<0.05
Water managementSexACP (mg pNP kg−1 h−1)ALP (mg phenol kg−1 h−1)SRL (m g−1)RTD (g cm−3)Foliar Mn2+ (mg kg−1)
Well wateredF44.5 ± 2.0a68.8 ± 2.1a13.5 ± 1.4b0.6 ± 0.1a56.7 ± 8.2b
Water deficiencyF24.6 ± 2.1c13.8 ± 1.7c19.5 ± 0.9a0.3 ± 0.1b53.3 ± 6.3b
Well wateredM41.8 ± 2.8a80.4 ± 5.9a8.5 ± 0.9c0.6 ± 0.1a44.9 ± 3.3b
Water deficiencyM34.1 ± 3.1b28.0 ± 1.5b12.3 ± 0.8b0.5 ± 0.1a78.4 ± 8.8a
Pwater<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.05<0.05
Psex0.2<0.001<0.001<0.050.4
Pwater × sex<0.050.70.30.3<0.05

Different letters in the column indicate significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test). Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 6). Statistically significant P-values are shown in bold. Abbreviations: Psex = sex effect, Pwater = water management practices, Pwater × sex = the interaction effect of water management practices and sex.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close