Table 1.
Open in new tab

Number of studies by elicitation method in the sample

Elicitation methodFramework
Self-assessments (total N = 14)

  • Dohmen et al. (2011) (N = 10)

  • Meuwissen, Huirne and Hardaker (2001) (N = 6)

Lotteries
(total N = 10)		Holt and Laury (2002) (N = 10)
Elicitation methodFramework
Self-assessments (total N = 14)

  • Dohmen et al. (2011) (N = 10)

  • Meuwissen, Huirne and Hardaker (2001) (N = 6)

Lotteries
(total N = 10)		Holt and Laury (2002) (N = 10)

Source: own elaboration based on 18 studies. Number of studies does not necessarily sum up to the total given that individual papers can elicit preferences using more than one method and measurement.

Table 1.
Open in new tab

Number of studies by elicitation method in the sample

Elicitation methodFramework
Self-assessments (total N = 14)

  • Dohmen et al. (2011) (N = 10)

  • Meuwissen, Huirne and Hardaker (2001) (N = 6)

Lotteries
(total N = 10)		Holt and Laury (2002) (N = 10)
Elicitation methodFramework
Self-assessments (total N = 14)

  • Dohmen et al. (2011) (N = 10)

  • Meuwissen, Huirne and Hardaker (2001) (N = 6)

Lotteries
(total N = 10)		Holt and Laury (2002) (N = 10)

Source: own elaboration based on 18 studies. Number of studies does not necessarily sum up to the total given that individual papers can elicit preferences using more than one method and measurement.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close