Direct and indirect effects of manipulation on outcomes performance and well-being.
. | Performance . | Irritation . | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . |
Freq interruptions t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 2.85 | .38 | 7.58 | .00 | 2.65 | .29 | 9.05 | .00 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | −0.01 | .05 | <1 | .88 | 0.07 | .04 | 1.62 | .11 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | 0.20 | .07 | 2.98 | .00 | 0.18 | .07 | 2.74 | .01 | ||||
Intervention | −0.66 | .11 | −6.36 | .00 | .41 | 16.04 | −0.67 | .10 | −6.48 | .00 | .42 | 17.08 |
Outcome t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 3.98 | .52 | 7.58 | .00 | 0.21 | .33 | 0.65 | .51 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | 0.41 | .06 | 6.67 | .00 | 0.71 | .04 | 17.24 | .00 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | −0.08 | .08 | −0.97 | .34 | 0.02 | .06 | 0.23 | .82 | ||||
Intervention | −0.12 | .14 | −0.81 | .41 | 0.06 | .11 | 0.55 | .58 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t2 | −0.23 | .08 | −2.80 | .01 | .44 | 14.41 | 0.13 | .06 | 2.04 | .04 | .76 | 81.17 |
Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | |||||
Indirect effect | 0.14 | .06 | 0.04 | 0.27 | −0.09 | .05 | −0.19 | −0.002 |
. | Performance . | Irritation . | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . |
Freq interruptions t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 2.85 | .38 | 7.58 | .00 | 2.65 | .29 | 9.05 | .00 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | −0.01 | .05 | <1 | .88 | 0.07 | .04 | 1.62 | .11 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | 0.20 | .07 | 2.98 | .00 | 0.18 | .07 | 2.74 | .01 | ||||
Intervention | −0.66 | .11 | −6.36 | .00 | .41 | 16.04 | −0.67 | .10 | −6.48 | .00 | .42 | 17.08 |
Outcome t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 3.98 | .52 | 7.58 | .00 | 0.21 | .33 | 0.65 | .51 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | 0.41 | .06 | 6.67 | .00 | 0.71 | .04 | 17.24 | .00 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | −0.08 | .08 | −0.97 | .34 | 0.02 | .06 | 0.23 | .82 | ||||
Intervention | −0.12 | .14 | −0.81 | .41 | 0.06 | .11 | 0.55 | .58 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t2 | −0.23 | .08 | −2.80 | .01 | .44 | 14.41 | 0.13 | .06 | 2.04 | .04 | .76 | 81.17 |
Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | |||||
Indirect effect | 0.14 | .06 | 0.04 | 0.27 | −0.09 | .05 | −0.19 | −0.002 |
Note: N = 247. Intervention was coded as 1 = control group, 2 = experimental group.
Direct and indirect effects of manipulation on outcomes performance and well-being.
. | Performance . | Irritation . | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . |
Freq interruptions t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 2.85 | .38 | 7.58 | .00 | 2.65 | .29 | 9.05 | .00 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | −0.01 | .05 | <1 | .88 | 0.07 | .04 | 1.62 | .11 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | 0.20 | .07 | 2.98 | .00 | 0.18 | .07 | 2.74 | .01 | ||||
Intervention | −0.66 | .11 | −6.36 | .00 | .41 | 16.04 | −0.67 | .10 | −6.48 | .00 | .42 | 17.08 |
Outcome t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 3.98 | .52 | 7.58 | .00 | 0.21 | .33 | 0.65 | .51 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | 0.41 | .06 | 6.67 | .00 | 0.71 | .04 | 17.24 | .00 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | −0.08 | .08 | −0.97 | .34 | 0.02 | .06 | 0.23 | .82 | ||||
Intervention | −0.12 | .14 | −0.81 | .41 | 0.06 | .11 | 0.55 | .58 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t2 | −0.23 | .08 | −2.80 | .01 | .44 | 14.41 | 0.13 | .06 | 2.04 | .04 | .76 | 81.17 |
Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | |||||
Indirect effect | 0.14 | .06 | 0.04 | 0.27 | −0.09 | .05 | −0.19 | −0.002 |
. | Performance . | Irritation . | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . | Coeff . | SE . | T . | P . | R . | F . |
Freq interruptions t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 2.85 | .38 | 7.58 | .00 | 2.65 | .29 | 9.05 | .00 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | −0.01 | .05 | <1 | .88 | 0.07 | .04 | 1.62 | .11 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | 0.20 | .07 | 2.98 | .00 | 0.18 | .07 | 2.74 | .01 | ||||
Intervention | −0.66 | .11 | −6.36 | .00 | .41 | 16.04 | −0.67 | .10 | −6.48 | .00 | .42 | 17.08 |
Outcome t2 | ||||||||||||
Constant | 3.98 | .52 | 7.58 | .00 | 0.21 | .33 | 0.65 | .51 | ||||
Outcome at t1 | 0.41 | .06 | 6.67 | .00 | 0.71 | .04 | 17.24 | .00 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t1 | −0.08 | .08 | −0.97 | .34 | 0.02 | .06 | 0.23 | .82 | ||||
Intervention | −0.12 | .14 | −0.81 | .41 | 0.06 | .11 | 0.55 | .58 | ||||
Frequency of interruptions t2 | −0.23 | .08 | −2.80 | .01 | .44 | 14.41 | 0.13 | .06 | 2.04 | .04 | .76 | 81.17 |
Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | Coeff | SE | LLCI | UCLI | |||||
Indirect effect | 0.14 | .06 | 0.04 | 0.27 | −0.09 | .05 | −0.19 | −0.002 |
Note: N = 247. Intervention was coded as 1 = control group, 2 = experimental group.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.