TABLE 5

Changes in managers’ and workers’ feelings toward treatment-work balance support.

ManagersAllocationMixed model
Control (n = 32)Intervention (n = 32)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to create an environment in which workers with illness can seek help (1 item, 0–5)4.1 ± 0.84.3 ± 1.10.3−0.3–0.9.372
Intention to create a workplace climate of understanding and helping each other (1 item, 0–5)4.2 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.00.2−0.3–0.6.500
Belief that TWBS initiatives can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.8 ± 0.94.1 ± 1.10.4−0.1–0.9.156
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)3.3 ± 1.03.8 ± 1.30.60.0–1.2.068
    WorkersControl (n = 246)Intervention (n = 295)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to seek help to the company if it becomes difficult for you to work due to illness (1 item, 0–5)3.5 ± 1.23.7 ± 1.1a0.20.0–0.4.086
Willingness to help others at work when colleagues are ill (1 item, 0–5)3.7 ± 1.03.9 ± 0.9a0.20.0–0.4.019*
Belief that TWBS initiative can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.2 ± 1.13.5 ± 1.0a0.30.1–0.5.004**
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)2.9 ± 1.23.2 ± 1.0a0.20.0–0.5.056
ManagersAllocationMixed model
Control (n = 32)Intervention (n = 32)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to create an environment in which workers with illness can seek help (1 item, 0–5)4.1 ± 0.84.3 ± 1.10.3−0.3–0.9.372
Intention to create a workplace climate of understanding and helping each other (1 item, 0–5)4.2 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.00.2−0.3–0.6.500
Belief that TWBS initiatives can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.8 ± 0.94.1 ± 1.10.4−0.1–0.9.156
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)3.3 ± 1.03.8 ± 1.30.60.0–1.2.068
    WorkersControl (n = 246)Intervention (n = 295)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to seek help to the company if it becomes difficult for you to work due to illness (1 item, 0–5)3.5 ± 1.23.7 ± 1.1a0.20.0–0.4.086
Willingness to help others at work when colleagues are ill (1 item, 0–5)3.7 ± 1.03.9 ± 0.9a0.20.0–0.4.019*
Belief that TWBS initiative can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.2 ± 1.13.5 ± 1.0a0.30.1–0.5.004**
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)2.9 ± 1.23.2 ± 1.0a0.20.0–0.5.056

Mixed model for managers: The model was constructed with or without intervention, employee size as fixed effects, and workplace as a random effect.Intervention effects were shown in the table. P < .10.

Employee size: Not significant except for “intention to create a workplace climate of understanding and helping each other” (estimated values = 0.54, P = 0.031).

Mixed model for workers: The model was constructed with or without intervention, employee size, and seminar format as fixed effects, and workplace as a random effect.Intervention effects were shown in the table. **P < .01, *P < .05, P < .10.

Employee size: Not significant except for “willingness to help others at work when colleagues are ill” (estimated values = 0.20, P = 0.024).

Seminar format: Not significant.

a

Significantly different from “Control” by t-test (P < .05).

TABLE 5

Changes in managers’ and workers’ feelings toward treatment-work balance support.

ManagersAllocationMixed model
Control (n = 32)Intervention (n = 32)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to create an environment in which workers with illness can seek help (1 item, 0–5)4.1 ± 0.84.3 ± 1.10.3−0.3–0.9.372
Intention to create a workplace climate of understanding and helping each other (1 item, 0–5)4.2 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.00.2−0.3–0.6.500
Belief that TWBS initiatives can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.8 ± 0.94.1 ± 1.10.4−0.1–0.9.156
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)3.3 ± 1.03.8 ± 1.30.60.0–1.2.068
    WorkersControl (n = 246)Intervention (n = 295)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to seek help to the company if it becomes difficult for you to work due to illness (1 item, 0–5)3.5 ± 1.23.7 ± 1.1a0.20.0–0.4.086
Willingness to help others at work when colleagues are ill (1 item, 0–5)3.7 ± 1.03.9 ± 0.9a0.20.0–0.4.019*
Belief that TWBS initiative can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.2 ± 1.13.5 ± 1.0a0.30.1–0.5.004**
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)2.9 ± 1.23.2 ± 1.0a0.20.0–0.5.056
ManagersAllocationMixed model
Control (n = 32)Intervention (n = 32)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to create an environment in which workers with illness can seek help (1 item, 0–5)4.1 ± 0.84.3 ± 1.10.3−0.3–0.9.372
Intention to create a workplace climate of understanding and helping each other (1 item, 0–5)4.2 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.00.2−0.3–0.6.500
Belief that TWBS initiatives can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.8 ± 0.94.1 ± 1.10.4−0.1–0.9.156
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)3.3 ± 1.03.8 ± 1.30.60.0–1.2.068
    WorkersControl (n = 246)Intervention (n = 295)Estimated values95% CIP-values
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Intention to seek help to the company if it becomes difficult for you to work due to illness (1 item, 0–5)3.5 ± 1.23.7 ± 1.1a0.20.0–0.4.086
Willingness to help others at work when colleagues are ill (1 item, 0–5)3.7 ± 1.03.9 ± 0.9a0.20.0–0.4.019*
Belief that TWBS initiative can prevent job turnover (1 item, 0–5)3.2 ± 1.13.5 ± 1.0a0.30.1–0.5.004**
Intention to use the OH center (1 item, 0–5)2.9 ± 1.23.2 ± 1.0a0.20.0–0.5.056

Mixed model for managers: The model was constructed with or without intervention, employee size as fixed effects, and workplace as a random effect.Intervention effects were shown in the table. P < .10.

Employee size: Not significant except for “intention to create a workplace climate of understanding and helping each other” (estimated values = 0.54, P = 0.031).

Mixed model for workers: The model was constructed with or without intervention, employee size, and seminar format as fixed effects, and workplace as a random effect.Intervention effects were shown in the table. **P < .01, *P < .05, P < .10.

Employee size: Not significant except for “willingness to help others at work when colleagues are ill” (estimated values = 0.20, P = 0.024).

Seminar format: Not significant.

a

Significantly different from “Control” by t-test (P < .05).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close