Table 2:

Average hardship level of the postings to which ambassadors of different professional backgrounds are sent

Professional backgroundAverage hardship levelDifference (a-b)
Career diplomats (a)0.404 (538)
Political appointees and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.276 (112)+0.128**
Politically connected professionals (a)0.341 (49)
Career diplomats and
political appointees (b)
0.385 (601)−0.044
Political appointees (a)0.225 (63)
Career diplomats and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.399 (587)−0.174**
Professional backgroundAverage hardship levelDifference (a-b)
Career diplomats (a)0.404 (538)
Political appointees and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.276 (112)+0.128**
Politically connected professionals (a)0.341 (49)
Career diplomats and
political appointees (b)
0.385 (601)−0.044
Political appointees (a)0.225 (63)
Career diplomats and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.399 (587)−0.174**

Source: Authors’ research

Note: The minimum level of hardship is 0, and the maximum level is 1.

**p<.001.79 Numbers in parentheses represent frequencies. N=650, as hardship level is missing for 19 cases.

Table 2:

Average hardship level of the postings to which ambassadors of different professional backgrounds are sent

Professional backgroundAverage hardship levelDifference (a-b)
Career diplomats (a)0.404 (538)
Political appointees and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.276 (112)+0.128**
Politically connected professionals (a)0.341 (49)
Career diplomats and
political appointees (b)
0.385 (601)−0.044
Political appointees (a)0.225 (63)
Career diplomats and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.399 (587)−0.174**
Professional backgroundAverage hardship levelDifference (a-b)
Career diplomats (a)0.404 (538)
Political appointees and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.276 (112)+0.128**
Politically connected professionals (a)0.341 (49)
Career diplomats and
political appointees (b)
0.385 (601)−0.044
Political appointees (a)0.225 (63)
Career diplomats and
politically connected professionals (b)
0.399 (587)−0.174**

Source: Authors’ research

Note: The minimum level of hardship is 0, and the maximum level is 1.

**p<.001.79 Numbers in parentheses represent frequencies. N=650, as hardship level is missing for 19 cases.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close