Limits that the ratio of losses must not exceed in order for expert output E1 (i.e. asserted support for H1 over H2), in the form of a likelihood ratio m/n of 103, combined with exemplary prior odds (PO, for H1 over H2), to make decision D1 (reliance on expert output E1) preferable to decision D2 (not relying on expert output E1).
m/n; . | PO . | . | Limiting value . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000; 3 | 1:100 | –2 | 10 | 1 |
1:10 | –1 | 100 | 2 | |
1:1 | 0 | 1,000 | 3 | |
10:1 | 1 | 10,000 | 4 | |
100:1 | 2 | 100,000 | 5 |
m/n; . | PO . | . | Limiting value . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000; 3 | 1:100 | –2 | 10 | 1 |
1:10 | –1 | 100 | 2 | |
1:1 | 0 | 1,000 | 3 | |
10:1 | 1 | 10,000 | 4 | |
100:1 | 2 | 100,000 | 5 |
Limits that the ratio of losses must not exceed in order for expert output E1 (i.e. asserted support for H1 over H2), in the form of a likelihood ratio m/n of 103, combined with exemplary prior odds (PO, for H1 over H2), to make decision D1 (reliance on expert output E1) preferable to decision D2 (not relying on expert output E1).
m/n; . | PO . | . | Limiting value . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000; 3 | 1:100 | –2 | 10 | 1 |
1:10 | –1 | 100 | 2 | |
1:1 | 0 | 1,000 | 3 | |
10:1 | 1 | 10,000 | 4 | |
100:1 | 2 | 100,000 | 5 |
m/n; . | PO . | . | Limiting value . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000; 3 | 1:100 | –2 | 10 | 1 |
1:10 | –1 | 100 | 2 | |
1:1 | 0 | 1,000 | 3 | |
10:1 | 1 | 10,000 | 4 | |
100:1 | 2 | 100,000 | 5 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.