Table 3.
Open in new tab

The percentage of radial rays of each of the four types: ‘distant shock’, ‘closer shock’, ‘gradual heating’, and ‘low entropy’. The mean fraction across all eight haloes is calculated separately for each resolution level. Since rays cover equal angular area, each fraction corresponds to the geometrical percentage of the sphere occupied by sightlines satisfying each criterion. The errors represent the standard deviation among the eight haloes.

TypeL9L10L11
Distant shock26.4 ± 5.121.3 ± 5.722.9 ± 10.7
Closer shock29.8 ± 14.034.8 ± 15.044.8 ± 17.6
Gradual heating27.4 ± 14.829.1 ± 11.227.6 ± 11.0
Low entropy4.3 ± 1.12.4 ± 1.20.3 ± 0.2
TypeL9L10L11
Distant shock26.4 ± 5.121.3 ± 5.722.9 ± 10.7
Closer shock29.8 ± 14.034.8 ± 15.044.8 ± 17.6
Gradual heating27.4 ± 14.829.1 ± 11.227.6 ± 11.0
Low entropy4.3 ± 1.12.4 ± 1.20.3 ± 0.2
Table 3.
Open in new tab

The percentage of radial rays of each of the four types: ‘distant shock’, ‘closer shock’, ‘gradual heating’, and ‘low entropy’. The mean fraction across all eight haloes is calculated separately for each resolution level. Since rays cover equal angular area, each fraction corresponds to the geometrical percentage of the sphere occupied by sightlines satisfying each criterion. The errors represent the standard deviation among the eight haloes.

TypeL9L10L11
Distant shock26.4 ± 5.121.3 ± 5.722.9 ± 10.7
Closer shock29.8 ± 14.034.8 ± 15.044.8 ± 17.6
Gradual heating27.4 ± 14.829.1 ± 11.227.6 ± 11.0
Low entropy4.3 ± 1.12.4 ± 1.20.3 ± 0.2
TypeL9L10L11
Distant shock26.4 ± 5.121.3 ± 5.722.9 ± 10.7
Closer shock29.8 ± 14.034.8 ± 15.044.8 ± 17.6
Gradual heating27.4 ± 14.829.1 ± 11.227.6 ± 11.0
Low entropy4.3 ± 1.12.4 ± 1.20.3 ± 0.2
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close