Table 1.

Power-law fits to the bubble size–halo mass relationship (shown in the top left panel of Fig. 8) in the form |$R_{\rm eff}/{\rm cMpc}= R_0 \, (M_{\rm halo}/\text{M}_{\odot })^\alpha$| for each neutral fraction, |$x_{\mathrm{H\, {\small I}}}$| (and corresponding redshift, z) for thesan-1. The power-law slope parameter, α, is plotted in Fig. 9 along with those from lower resolution simulations.

|$x_{\mathrm{H\, {\small I}}}$|0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
z6.16.46.76.97.37.88.39.010.4
α0.0160.0500.0840.110.150.190.220.270.29
R0399.02.50.870.210.0670.0210.00510.0020
|$x_{\mathrm{H\, {\small I}}}$|0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
z6.16.46.76.97.37.88.39.010.4
α0.0160.0500.0840.110.150.190.220.270.29
R0399.02.50.870.210.0670.0210.00510.0020
Table 1.

Power-law fits to the bubble size–halo mass relationship (shown in the top left panel of Fig. 8) in the form |$R_{\rm eff}/{\rm cMpc}= R_0 \, (M_{\rm halo}/\text{M}_{\odot })^\alpha$| for each neutral fraction, |$x_{\mathrm{H\, {\small I}}}$| (and corresponding redshift, z) for thesan-1. The power-law slope parameter, α, is plotted in Fig. 9 along with those from lower resolution simulations.

|$x_{\mathrm{H\, {\small I}}}$|0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
z6.16.46.76.97.37.88.39.010.4
α0.0160.0500.0840.110.150.190.220.270.29
R0399.02.50.870.210.0670.0210.00510.0020
|$x_{\mathrm{H\, {\small I}}}$|0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
z6.16.46.76.97.37.88.39.010.4
α0.0160.0500.0840.110.150.190.220.270.29
R0399.02.50.870.210.0670.0210.00510.0020
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close