Table 1

Performance comparison of sequencing platforms of various generations

MethodGenerationRead length (bp)Single pass error rate (%)No. of reads per runTime per runCost per million bases (USD)Refs.
Sanger ABI 3730×l1st600–10000.001960.5–3 h500[14,18–21]
Ion Torrent2nd20018.2 × 1072–4 h0.1[15,25]
454 (Roche) GS FLX+2nd70011 × 10623 h8.57[14,17,27]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (High Output)2nd2 × 1250.18 × 109 (paired)7–60 h0.03[9,16,26]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Rapid Run)2nd2 × 2500.11.2 × 109 (paired)1–6 days0.04[9,16,26]
SOLiD 5500×l2nd2 × 6058 × 1086 days0.11[14,24]
PacBio RS II: P6-C43rd1.0–1.5 × 104 on average133.5–7.5 × 1040.5–4 h0.40–0.80[5,12,15]
Oxford Nanopore MinION3rd2–5 × 103 on average381.1–4.7 × 10450 h6.44–17.90[22,23]
MethodGenerationRead length (bp)Single pass error rate (%)No. of reads per runTime per runCost per million bases (USD)Refs.
Sanger ABI 3730×l1st600–10000.001960.5–3 h500[14,18–21]
Ion Torrent2nd20018.2 × 1072–4 h0.1[15,25]
454 (Roche) GS FLX+2nd70011 × 10623 h8.57[14,17,27]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (High Output)2nd2 × 1250.18 × 109 (paired)7–60 h0.03[9,16,26]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Rapid Run)2nd2 × 2500.11.2 × 109 (paired)1–6 days0.04[9,16,26]
SOLiD 5500×l2nd2 × 6058 × 1086 days0.11[14,24]
PacBio RS II: P6-C43rd1.0–1.5 × 104 on average133.5–7.5 × 1040.5–4 h0.40–0.80[5,12,15]
Oxford Nanopore MinION3rd2–5 × 103 on average381.1–4.7 × 10450 h6.44–17.90[22,23]
Table 1

Performance comparison of sequencing platforms of various generations

MethodGenerationRead length (bp)Single pass error rate (%)No. of reads per runTime per runCost per million bases (USD)Refs.
Sanger ABI 3730×l1st600–10000.001960.5–3 h500[14,18–21]
Ion Torrent2nd20018.2 × 1072–4 h0.1[15,25]
454 (Roche) GS FLX+2nd70011 × 10623 h8.57[14,17,27]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (High Output)2nd2 × 1250.18 × 109 (paired)7–60 h0.03[9,16,26]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Rapid Run)2nd2 × 2500.11.2 × 109 (paired)1–6 days0.04[9,16,26]
SOLiD 5500×l2nd2 × 6058 × 1086 days0.11[14,24]
PacBio RS II: P6-C43rd1.0–1.5 × 104 on average133.5–7.5 × 1040.5–4 h0.40–0.80[5,12,15]
Oxford Nanopore MinION3rd2–5 × 103 on average381.1–4.7 × 10450 h6.44–17.90[22,23]
MethodGenerationRead length (bp)Single pass error rate (%)No. of reads per runTime per runCost per million bases (USD)Refs.
Sanger ABI 3730×l1st600–10000.001960.5–3 h500[14,18–21]
Ion Torrent2nd20018.2 × 1072–4 h0.1[15,25]
454 (Roche) GS FLX+2nd70011 × 10623 h8.57[14,17,27]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (High Output)2nd2 × 1250.18 × 109 (paired)7–60 h0.03[9,16,26]
Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Rapid Run)2nd2 × 2500.11.2 × 109 (paired)1–6 days0.04[9,16,26]
SOLiD 5500×l2nd2 × 6058 × 1086 days0.11[14,24]
PacBio RS II: P6-C43rd1.0–1.5 × 104 on average133.5–7.5 × 1040.5–4 h0.40–0.80[5,12,15]
Oxford Nanopore MinION3rd2–5 × 103 on average381.1–4.7 × 10450 h6.44–17.90[22,23]
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close