Table 5.

BCG Skin Reaction Prevalence and Risk of Lymphadenitis by BCG Strain in the Subgroup of Infants Reached by Home Visits

SexInfants With No Visible BCG Skin ReactionMean Size of BCG Skin ReactionHistory of Left Axillary Lymphadenitisa
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia No Reaction PR
(95% CI)b
Size, mm (SD)Reaction Size,
MD (95% CI)c
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia RR (95% CI)b
BCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-Russia
Home visits conducted by 2 months of age
 Male0.6% (3/534)2.0% (11/559)0.29 (.08–1.02)5.3 (1.4)4.8 (1.2)0.51 (.35–.67)d0.0% (0/530)0.4% (2/556)
 Female1.0% (5/518)1.9% (10/526)0.51 (.17–1.48)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.1)0.52 (.36–.67)d0.2% (1/514)0.4% (2/526)0.51 (.05–5.63)
 Total0.8% (8/1052)1.9% (21/1085)0.39 (.17–.88)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.2)0.51 (.40–.62)d0.1% (1/1044)0.4% (4/1082)0.26 (.03–2.31)
Home visits conducted by 6 months of age
 Male1.3% (6/473)2.5% (12/489)0.52 (.20–1.37)5.1 (1.6)4.5 (1.3)0.54 (.33–.76)d0.0% (0/471)0.2% (1/485)
 Female0.4% (2/486)2.1% (10/471)0.19 (.04–.88)5.1 (1.3)4.4 (1.3)0.66 (.46–.85)d0.2% (1/485)0.0% (0/468)
 Total0.8% (8/959)2.3% (22/960)0.36 (.16–.81)5.1 (1.5)4.5 (1.3)0.61 (.46–.74)d0.1% (1/956)0.1% (1/953)1.00 (.06–15.9)
SexInfants With No Visible BCG Skin ReactionMean Size of BCG Skin ReactionHistory of Left Axillary Lymphadenitisa
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia No Reaction PR
(95% CI)b
Size, mm (SD)Reaction Size,
MD (95% CI)c
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia RR (95% CI)b
BCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-Russia
Home visits conducted by 2 months of age
 Male0.6% (3/534)2.0% (11/559)0.29 (.08–1.02)5.3 (1.4)4.8 (1.2)0.51 (.35–.67)d0.0% (0/530)0.4% (2/556)
 Female1.0% (5/518)1.9% (10/526)0.51 (.17–1.48)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.1)0.52 (.36–.67)d0.2% (1/514)0.4% (2/526)0.51 (.05–5.63)
 Total0.8% (8/1052)1.9% (21/1085)0.39 (.17–.88)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.2)0.51 (.40–.62)d0.1% (1/1044)0.4% (4/1082)0.26 (.03–2.31)
Home visits conducted by 6 months of age
 Male1.3% (6/473)2.5% (12/489)0.52 (.20–1.37)5.1 (1.6)4.5 (1.3)0.54 (.33–.76)d0.0% (0/471)0.2% (1/485)
 Female0.4% (2/486)2.1% (10/471)0.19 (.04–.88)5.1 (1.3)4.4 (1.3)0.66 (.46–.85)d0.2% (1/485)0.0% (0/468)
 Total0.8% (8/959)2.3% (22/960)0.36 (.16–.81)5.1 (1.5)4.5 (1.3)0.61 (.46–.74)d0.1% (1/956)0.1% (1/953)1.00 (.06–15.9)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; PR, prevalence ratio; RR, risk ratio; SD, standard deviation.

aHistory of left axillary lymphadenitis reported by the mother/guardian.

bBinomial regression.

cStudent t test providing estimates of MD in BCG reaction size (height + width divided by 2) between intervention and control groups.

dP < .001.

Table 5.

BCG Skin Reaction Prevalence and Risk of Lymphadenitis by BCG Strain in the Subgroup of Infants Reached by Home Visits

SexInfants With No Visible BCG Skin ReactionMean Size of BCG Skin ReactionHistory of Left Axillary Lymphadenitisa
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia No Reaction PR
(95% CI)b
Size, mm (SD)Reaction Size,
MD (95% CI)c
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia RR (95% CI)b
BCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-Russia
Home visits conducted by 2 months of age
 Male0.6% (3/534)2.0% (11/559)0.29 (.08–1.02)5.3 (1.4)4.8 (1.2)0.51 (.35–.67)d0.0% (0/530)0.4% (2/556)
 Female1.0% (5/518)1.9% (10/526)0.51 (.17–1.48)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.1)0.52 (.36–.67)d0.2% (1/514)0.4% (2/526)0.51 (.05–5.63)
 Total0.8% (8/1052)1.9% (21/1085)0.39 (.17–.88)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.2)0.51 (.40–.62)d0.1% (1/1044)0.4% (4/1082)0.26 (.03–2.31)
Home visits conducted by 6 months of age
 Male1.3% (6/473)2.5% (12/489)0.52 (.20–1.37)5.1 (1.6)4.5 (1.3)0.54 (.33–.76)d0.0% (0/471)0.2% (1/485)
 Female0.4% (2/486)2.1% (10/471)0.19 (.04–.88)5.1 (1.3)4.4 (1.3)0.66 (.46–.85)d0.2% (1/485)0.0% (0/468)
 Total0.8% (8/959)2.3% (22/960)0.36 (.16–.81)5.1 (1.5)4.5 (1.3)0.61 (.46–.74)d0.1% (1/956)0.1% (1/953)1.00 (.06–15.9)
SexInfants With No Visible BCG Skin ReactionMean Size of BCG Skin ReactionHistory of Left Axillary Lymphadenitisa
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia No Reaction PR
(95% CI)b
Size, mm (SD)Reaction Size,
MD (95% CI)c
% (no./No.)Japan/Russia RR (95% CI)b
BCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-RussiaBCG-JapanBCG-Russia
Home visits conducted by 2 months of age
 Male0.6% (3/534)2.0% (11/559)0.29 (.08–1.02)5.3 (1.4)4.8 (1.2)0.51 (.35–.67)d0.0% (0/530)0.4% (2/556)
 Female1.0% (5/518)1.9% (10/526)0.51 (.17–1.48)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.1)0.52 (.36–.67)d0.2% (1/514)0.4% (2/526)0.51 (.05–5.63)
 Total0.8% (8/1052)1.9% (21/1085)0.39 (.17–.88)5.2 (1.3)4.7 (1.2)0.51 (.40–.62)d0.1% (1/1044)0.4% (4/1082)0.26 (.03–2.31)
Home visits conducted by 6 months of age
 Male1.3% (6/473)2.5% (12/489)0.52 (.20–1.37)5.1 (1.6)4.5 (1.3)0.54 (.33–.76)d0.0% (0/471)0.2% (1/485)
 Female0.4% (2/486)2.1% (10/471)0.19 (.04–.88)5.1 (1.3)4.4 (1.3)0.66 (.46–.85)d0.2% (1/485)0.0% (0/468)
 Total0.8% (8/959)2.3% (22/960)0.36 (.16–.81)5.1 (1.5)4.5 (1.3)0.61 (.46–.74)d0.1% (1/956)0.1% (1/953)1.00 (.06–15.9)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; PR, prevalence ratio; RR, risk ratio; SD, standard deviation.

aHistory of left axillary lymphadenitis reported by the mother/guardian.

bBinomial regression.

cStudent t test providing estimates of MD in BCG reaction size (height + width divided by 2) between intervention and control groups.

dP < .001.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close