Table 3.

The Longitudinal Adjusted Associations of Participant Characteristics With FEV1 <80% Predicted and FVC <80% Predicted Using the Fixed Ratio Definitiona

OverallFEV1 <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P ValueFVC <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P Value
nparticipants = 358; nobs = 617nparticipants = 341; nobs = 575
Age >32 y1.34 (0.85–2.11).211.16 (0.72–1.89).54
Female sex1.68 (1.05–2.69).031.53 (0.93–2.50).09
BMI, tertile 2 vs 1b0.60 (0.41–0.87).010.48 (0.33–0.69)<.001
BMI, tertile 3 vs 10.33 (0.21–0.54)<.0010.25 (0.16–0.41)<.001
Ptrend<.001<.001
Ever cigarette smoker1.49 (0.82–2.72).191.32 (0.69–2.49).40
Exposure to biomass fuel at home0.87 (0.51–1.47).590.75 (0.44–1.29).31
HIV+ vs HIV-0.50 (0.30–0.83).010.58 (0.33–0.94).03
TB+ vs TB-0.54 (0.29–1.00).050.75 (0.38–1.49).41
HIV+nparticipants = 137; nobs = 239nparticipants = 130; nobs = 221
Female sex3.20 (1.39–7.36).0063.20 (1.26–8.13).02
HIV-nparticipants = 221; nobs = 378nparticipants = 211; nobs = 354
Female sex1.26 (0.72–2.23).421.23 (0.68–2.25).49
OverallFEV1 <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P ValueFVC <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P Value
nparticipants = 358; nobs = 617nparticipants = 341; nobs = 575
Age >32 y1.34 (0.85–2.11).211.16 (0.72–1.89).54
Female sex1.68 (1.05–2.69).031.53 (0.93–2.50).09
BMI, tertile 2 vs 1b0.60 (0.41–0.87).010.48 (0.33–0.69)<.001
BMI, tertile 3 vs 10.33 (0.21–0.54)<.0010.25 (0.16–0.41)<.001
Ptrend<.001<.001
Ever cigarette smoker1.49 (0.82–2.72).191.32 (0.69–2.49).40
Exposure to biomass fuel at home0.87 (0.51–1.47).590.75 (0.44–1.29).31
HIV+ vs HIV-0.50 (0.30–0.83).010.58 (0.33–0.94).03
TB+ vs TB-0.54 (0.29–1.00).050.75 (0.38–1.49).41
HIV+nparticipants = 137; nobs = 239nparticipants = 130; nobs = 221
Female sex3.20 (1.39–7.36).0063.20 (1.26–8.13).02
HIV-nparticipants = 221; nobs = 378nparticipants = 211; nobs = 354
Female sex1.26 (0.72–2.23).421.23 (0.68–2.25).49

nparticipants = the number of participants included in the analysis; nobs = the number of unique observations included in the analysis. The bold values are those that reached statistical significance.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; FEV1%predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as percentage of predicted reference value; FVC% predicted, forced vital capacity as percentage of predicted reference value; TB, tuberculosis.

aAdjusted for age, BMI, smoking status, biomass fuel exposure, HIV, and TB status.

bBMI was divided into tertiles to facilitate model convergence. For clinical interpretation, trend was also assessed.

Table 3.

The Longitudinal Adjusted Associations of Participant Characteristics With FEV1 <80% Predicted and FVC <80% Predicted Using the Fixed Ratio Definitiona

OverallFEV1 <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P ValueFVC <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P Value
nparticipants = 358; nobs = 617nparticipants = 341; nobs = 575
Age >32 y1.34 (0.85–2.11).211.16 (0.72–1.89).54
Female sex1.68 (1.05–2.69).031.53 (0.93–2.50).09
BMI, tertile 2 vs 1b0.60 (0.41–0.87).010.48 (0.33–0.69)<.001
BMI, tertile 3 vs 10.33 (0.21–0.54)<.0010.25 (0.16–0.41)<.001
Ptrend<.001<.001
Ever cigarette smoker1.49 (0.82–2.72).191.32 (0.69–2.49).40
Exposure to biomass fuel at home0.87 (0.51–1.47).590.75 (0.44–1.29).31
HIV+ vs HIV-0.50 (0.30–0.83).010.58 (0.33–0.94).03
TB+ vs TB-0.54 (0.29–1.00).050.75 (0.38–1.49).41
HIV+nparticipants = 137; nobs = 239nparticipants = 130; nobs = 221
Female sex3.20 (1.39–7.36).0063.20 (1.26–8.13).02
HIV-nparticipants = 221; nobs = 378nparticipants = 211; nobs = 354
Female sex1.26 (0.72–2.23).421.23 (0.68–2.25).49
OverallFEV1 <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P ValueFVC <80% Predicted vs Normal
aOR (95% CI)
P Value
nparticipants = 358; nobs = 617nparticipants = 341; nobs = 575
Age >32 y1.34 (0.85–2.11).211.16 (0.72–1.89).54
Female sex1.68 (1.05–2.69).031.53 (0.93–2.50).09
BMI, tertile 2 vs 1b0.60 (0.41–0.87).010.48 (0.33–0.69)<.001
BMI, tertile 3 vs 10.33 (0.21–0.54)<.0010.25 (0.16–0.41)<.001
Ptrend<.001<.001
Ever cigarette smoker1.49 (0.82–2.72).191.32 (0.69–2.49).40
Exposure to biomass fuel at home0.87 (0.51–1.47).590.75 (0.44–1.29).31
HIV+ vs HIV-0.50 (0.30–0.83).010.58 (0.33–0.94).03
TB+ vs TB-0.54 (0.29–1.00).050.75 (0.38–1.49).41
HIV+nparticipants = 137; nobs = 239nparticipants = 130; nobs = 221
Female sex3.20 (1.39–7.36).0063.20 (1.26–8.13).02
HIV-nparticipants = 221; nobs = 378nparticipants = 211; nobs = 354
Female sex1.26 (0.72–2.23).421.23 (0.68–2.25).49

nparticipants = the number of participants included in the analysis; nobs = the number of unique observations included in the analysis. The bold values are those that reached statistical significance.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; FEV1%predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as percentage of predicted reference value; FVC% predicted, forced vital capacity as percentage of predicted reference value; TB, tuberculosis.

aAdjusted for age, BMI, smoking status, biomass fuel exposure, HIV, and TB status.

bBMI was divided into tertiles to facilitate model convergence. For clinical interpretation, trend was also assessed.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close