Proposed definition criteria for the atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation phenotype
Definition criteria for A-STR . | Recommended cut-offs and caveats . |
---|---|
1. Clinically relevant STR (greater or equal to moderate) | Alternative causes of STR and the typical imaging features of primary TR should be adequately ruled outa |
![]() |
|
2. Predominant TA dilation | Limits of normality for parameters of TA size depend on sex, body size, view, and timing of measurement during the cardiac cycle |
![]() | 2D Echo measurements at end-diastole48,50:
|
3. Predominant RA dilation with increased end-systolic RA:RV ratio | RA dilation is not specific for A-STR, but rather its disproportion compared with RV size |
![]() |
|
4. Absence of significant tricuspid leaflet tethering | Single-plane measurement of coaptation height might underestimate leaflet tenting in case of asymmetric tethering |
![]() | Absence of significant TV leaflet tethering is defined by
|
5. RV conical remodelling with predominant enlargement of RV basal dimension | RV sphericity is a surrogate index reflecting conical (triangular) RV remodelling, and is calculated as (RV midventricular diameter × RV longitudinal diameter)/RV basal diameter |
![]() |
|
6. Preserved LV and RV systolic function | Preserved bi-ventricular function criteria may not apply if the A-STR patient is evaluated during AF with relatively rapid ventricular response or in the late stages of severe to torrential A-STR (with/without significant A-SMR) |
![]() |
|
Definition criteria for A-STR . | Recommended cut-offs and caveats . |
---|---|
1. Clinically relevant STR (greater or equal to moderate) | Alternative causes of STR and the typical imaging features of primary TR should be adequately ruled outa |
![]() |
|
2. Predominant TA dilation | Limits of normality for parameters of TA size depend on sex, body size, view, and timing of measurement during the cardiac cycle |
![]() | 2D Echo measurements at end-diastole48,50:
|
3. Predominant RA dilation with increased end-systolic RA:RV ratio | RA dilation is not specific for A-STR, but rather its disproportion compared with RV size |
![]() |
|
4. Absence of significant tricuspid leaflet tethering | Single-plane measurement of coaptation height might underestimate leaflet tenting in case of asymmetric tethering |
![]() | Absence of significant TV leaflet tethering is defined by
|
5. RV conical remodelling with predominant enlargement of RV basal dimension | RV sphericity is a surrogate index reflecting conical (triangular) RV remodelling, and is calculated as (RV midventricular diameter × RV longitudinal diameter)/RV basal diameter |
![]() |
|
6. Preserved LV and RV systolic function | Preserved bi-ventricular function criteria may not apply if the A-STR patient is evaluated during AF with relatively rapid ventricular response or in the late stages of severe to torrential A-STR (with/without significant A-SMR) |
![]() |
|
Definite A-STR diagnosis requires the fulfilment of all six criteria. Probable A-STR is defined by at least 4 criteria. Specific thresholds for parameters describing the geometry of right chambers and TV in A-STR are based on currently limited evidence, normative data, or TVARC document49 and might be further refined by future dedicated studies on A-STR.
aSee Supplementary material.
2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; AF, atrial fibrillation; A-SMR, atrial secondary mitral regurgitation; A-STR, atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation; EROA, effective regurgitant orifice area; FAC, fractional area change; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PISA, proximal isovelocity surface area; RA, right atrial; RV, right ventricular; RVFWLS, right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; SR, sinus rhythm; STR; secondary tricuspid regurgitation; TA, tricuspid annulus; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TDI S’, tissue Doppler imaging systolic velocity; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; TV, tricuspid valve; VC, vena contracta.
Proposed definition criteria for the atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation phenotype
Definition criteria for A-STR . | Recommended cut-offs and caveats . |
---|---|
1. Clinically relevant STR (greater or equal to moderate) | Alternative causes of STR and the typical imaging features of primary TR should be adequately ruled outa |
![]() |
|
2. Predominant TA dilation | Limits of normality for parameters of TA size depend on sex, body size, view, and timing of measurement during the cardiac cycle |
![]() | 2D Echo measurements at end-diastole48,50:
|
3. Predominant RA dilation with increased end-systolic RA:RV ratio | RA dilation is not specific for A-STR, but rather its disproportion compared with RV size |
![]() |
|
4. Absence of significant tricuspid leaflet tethering | Single-plane measurement of coaptation height might underestimate leaflet tenting in case of asymmetric tethering |
![]() | Absence of significant TV leaflet tethering is defined by
|
5. RV conical remodelling with predominant enlargement of RV basal dimension | RV sphericity is a surrogate index reflecting conical (triangular) RV remodelling, and is calculated as (RV midventricular diameter × RV longitudinal diameter)/RV basal diameter |
![]() |
|
6. Preserved LV and RV systolic function | Preserved bi-ventricular function criteria may not apply if the A-STR patient is evaluated during AF with relatively rapid ventricular response or in the late stages of severe to torrential A-STR (with/without significant A-SMR) |
![]() |
|
Definition criteria for A-STR . | Recommended cut-offs and caveats . |
---|---|
1. Clinically relevant STR (greater or equal to moderate) | Alternative causes of STR and the typical imaging features of primary TR should be adequately ruled outa |
![]() |
|
2. Predominant TA dilation | Limits of normality for parameters of TA size depend on sex, body size, view, and timing of measurement during the cardiac cycle |
![]() | 2D Echo measurements at end-diastole48,50:
|
3. Predominant RA dilation with increased end-systolic RA:RV ratio | RA dilation is not specific for A-STR, but rather its disproportion compared with RV size |
![]() |
|
4. Absence of significant tricuspid leaflet tethering | Single-plane measurement of coaptation height might underestimate leaflet tenting in case of asymmetric tethering |
![]() | Absence of significant TV leaflet tethering is defined by
|
5. RV conical remodelling with predominant enlargement of RV basal dimension | RV sphericity is a surrogate index reflecting conical (triangular) RV remodelling, and is calculated as (RV midventricular diameter × RV longitudinal diameter)/RV basal diameter |
![]() |
|
6. Preserved LV and RV systolic function | Preserved bi-ventricular function criteria may not apply if the A-STR patient is evaluated during AF with relatively rapid ventricular response or in the late stages of severe to torrential A-STR (with/without significant A-SMR) |
![]() |
|
Definite A-STR diagnosis requires the fulfilment of all six criteria. Probable A-STR is defined by at least 4 criteria. Specific thresholds for parameters describing the geometry of right chambers and TV in A-STR are based on currently limited evidence, normative data, or TVARC document49 and might be further refined by future dedicated studies on A-STR.
aSee Supplementary material.
2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; AF, atrial fibrillation; A-SMR, atrial secondary mitral regurgitation; A-STR, atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation; EROA, effective regurgitant orifice area; FAC, fractional area change; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PISA, proximal isovelocity surface area; RA, right atrial; RV, right ventricular; RVFWLS, right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; SR, sinus rhythm; STR; secondary tricuspid regurgitation; TA, tricuspid annulus; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TDI S’, tissue Doppler imaging systolic velocity; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; TV, tricuspid valve; VC, vena contracta.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.