Table 1.
Open in new tab

Average Mantel correlation values comparing T-RFLP community composition and possible controlling factors within each stand, followed by number of stands with significant positive Mantel values. n = 3 stands per ecosystem, and n = 7–30 leaves per stand.

AprilAugust
EcosystemProx.Leaf typeDepthProx.Leaf typeDepth
BOWO0.22 (3)0.02 (1)0.04 (1)0.08 (1)0.06 (2)−0.08 (0)
SMBW−0.04 (0)0.18 (3)0.1 (1)0.06 (1)0.26 (3)0.02 (0)
SMRO0.08 (1)0.09 (1)0.05 (0)0.18 (2)0.13 (1)0.23 (2)
AprilAugust
EcosystemProx.Leaf typeDepthProx.Leaf typeDepth
BOWO0.22 (3)0.02 (1)0.04 (1)0.08 (1)0.06 (2)−0.08 (0)
SMBW−0.04 (0)0.18 (3)0.1 (1)0.06 (1)0.26 (3)0.02 (0)
SMRO0.08 (1)0.09 (1)0.05 (0)0.18 (2)0.13 (1)0.23 (2)
Table 1.
Open in new tab

Average Mantel correlation values comparing T-RFLP community composition and possible controlling factors within each stand, followed by number of stands with significant positive Mantel values. n = 3 stands per ecosystem, and n = 7–30 leaves per stand.

AprilAugust
EcosystemProx.Leaf typeDepthProx.Leaf typeDepth
BOWO0.22 (3)0.02 (1)0.04 (1)0.08 (1)0.06 (2)−0.08 (0)
SMBW−0.04 (0)0.18 (3)0.1 (1)0.06 (1)0.26 (3)0.02 (0)
SMRO0.08 (1)0.09 (1)0.05 (0)0.18 (2)0.13 (1)0.23 (2)
AprilAugust
EcosystemProx.Leaf typeDepthProx.Leaf typeDepth
BOWO0.22 (3)0.02 (1)0.04 (1)0.08 (1)0.06 (2)−0.08 (0)
SMBW−0.04 (0)0.18 (3)0.1 (1)0.06 (1)0.26 (3)0.02 (0)
SMRO0.08 (1)0.09 (1)0.05 (0)0.18 (2)0.13 (1)0.23 (2)
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close