Comparison of scaled (via eqs. (17) and (20)) with numerically computed values from Moreno et al. (2022). The referential case is ad = 10−3 [m], Qg = 3 · 1028 [s−1], ϱd = 800 [kg m–3] which gives for |$v_d^t$| [m s–1] and ωt [s−1] the following values: 10.0 and 1.6 for Begonia; 10.0 and 2.7 for Glasenappia; 9.34 and 0.9 for Aurora.
Case . | ad . | Qg . | Iv . | Iv/Fu . | |$v_d^t$|[m s–1] . | ωt[s−1] . | εv . | εω . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | [m] . | [s−1] . | . | . | Scaled . | Computed . | Scaled . | Computed . | per cent . | per cent . |
Begonia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 14.37 | 3.33 |
Glasenappia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.50 | 0.5 | 14.37 | 0.0 |
Aurora | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.71 | 1.45 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 17.93 | 13.33 |
Begonia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.06 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 3.27 | 77.78 |
Glasenappia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.10 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 1.94 | 35.00 |
Aurora | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 2.95 | 2.85 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 3.51 | 125.00 |
Begonia | 10−4 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−4 | 1.243· 103 | 31.62 | 31.50 | 15.62 | 97.5 | 0.38 | 83.98 |
Glasenappia | 10−5 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−3 | 1.243· 104 | 100.00 | 98.20 | 243.57 | 780.00 | 1.83 | 68.77 |
Begonia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1067.13 | – | – | – |
Glasenappia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1800.78 | – | – | – |
Aurora | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 295.36 | – | 620.24 | – | – | – |
Case . | ad . | Qg . | Iv . | Iv/Fu . | |$v_d^t$|[m s–1] . | ωt[s−1] . | εv . | εω . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | [m] . | [s−1] . | . | . | Scaled . | Computed . | Scaled . | Computed . | per cent . | per cent . |
Begonia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 14.37 | 3.33 |
Glasenappia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.50 | 0.5 | 14.37 | 0.0 |
Aurora | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.71 | 1.45 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 17.93 | 13.33 |
Begonia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.06 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 3.27 | 77.78 |
Glasenappia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.10 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 1.94 | 35.00 |
Aurora | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 2.95 | 2.85 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 3.51 | 125.00 |
Begonia | 10−4 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−4 | 1.243· 103 | 31.62 | 31.50 | 15.62 | 97.5 | 0.38 | 83.98 |
Glasenappia | 10−5 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−3 | 1.243· 104 | 100.00 | 98.20 | 243.57 | 780.00 | 1.83 | 68.77 |
Begonia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1067.13 | – | – | – |
Glasenappia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1800.78 | – | – | – |
Aurora | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 295.36 | – | 620.24 | – | – | – |
Comparison of scaled (via eqs. (17) and (20)) with numerically computed values from Moreno et al. (2022). The referential case is ad = 10−3 [m], Qg = 3 · 1028 [s−1], ϱd = 800 [kg m–3] which gives for |$v_d^t$| [m s–1] and ωt [s−1] the following values: 10.0 and 1.6 for Begonia; 10.0 and 2.7 for Glasenappia; 9.34 and 0.9 for Aurora.
Case . | ad . | Qg . | Iv . | Iv/Fu . | |$v_d^t$|[m s–1] . | ωt[s−1] . | εv . | εω . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | [m] . | [s−1] . | . | . | Scaled . | Computed . | Scaled . | Computed . | per cent . | per cent . |
Begonia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 14.37 | 3.33 |
Glasenappia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.50 | 0.5 | 14.37 | 0.0 |
Aurora | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.71 | 1.45 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 17.93 | 13.33 |
Begonia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.06 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 3.27 | 77.78 |
Glasenappia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.10 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 1.94 | 35.00 |
Aurora | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 2.95 | 2.85 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 3.51 | 125.00 |
Begonia | 10−4 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−4 | 1.243· 103 | 31.62 | 31.50 | 15.62 | 97.5 | 0.38 | 83.98 |
Glasenappia | 10−5 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−3 | 1.243· 104 | 100.00 | 98.20 | 243.57 | 780.00 | 1.83 | 68.77 |
Begonia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1067.13 | – | – | – |
Glasenappia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1800.78 | – | – | – |
Aurora | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 295.36 | – | 620.24 | – | – | – |
Case . | ad . | Qg . | Iv . | Iv/Fu . | |$v_d^t$|[m s–1] . | ωt[s−1] . | εv . | εω . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | [m] . | [s−1] . | . | . | Scaled . | Computed . | Scaled . | Computed . | per cent . | per cent . |
Begonia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 14.37 | 3.33 |
Glasenappia | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.83 | 1.6 | 0.50 | 0.5 | 14.37 | 0.0 |
Aurora | 10−3 | 1· 1027 | 1.6· 10−6 | 4.144 | 1.71 | 1.45 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 17.93 | 13.33 |
Begonia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.06 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 3.27 | 77.78 |
Glasenappia | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 3.16 | 3.10 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 1.94 | 35.00 |
Aurora | 10−2 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−6 | 12.43 | 2.95 | 2.85 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 3.51 | 125.00 |
Begonia | 10−4 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−4 | 1.243· 103 | 31.62 | 31.50 | 15.62 | 97.5 | 0.38 | 83.98 |
Glasenappia | 10−5 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−3 | 1.243· 104 | 100.00 | 98.20 | 243.57 | 780.00 | 1.83 | 68.77 |
Begonia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1067.13 | – | – | – |
Glasenappia | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 316.23 | – | 1800.78 | – | – | – |
Aurora | 10−6 | 3· 1028 | 4.8· 10−2 | 1.243· 105 | 295.36 | – | 620.24 | – | – | – |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.