Table 1.

Correlation results of historical, quasi-simultaneous and δD-corrected samples. Columns from left to right: (1): the sample studied in correlation analysis; (2): the number of blazars in the sample; (3) and (6) are the Spearman test correlation coefficients; (4) and (7) are the chance probabilities; (5) and (8) are the slopes of the best linear fitting equations.

In the observers’ frameNlog (Y) versus log (νobs)|$\log (L_{{\rm rad}}^{{\rm obs}})~ {\rm versus}~ \log (\nu ^{{\rm {obs}}})$|
τpsτps
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ALL, historical sample1594−0.595.5 × 10−152−0.31 ± 0.009−0.482.0 × 10−91−0.35 ± 0.02
ALL, quasi-simultaneous sample109−0.180.06−0.34 ± 0.07−0.050.63−0.38 ± 0.12
FSRQs, historical sample
ALL750−0.0020.95−0.04 ± 0.04−0.147.8 × 10−5−0.29 ± 0.06
Y ≤ 1288−0.0050.93−0.02 ± 0.03−0.205.0 × 10−4−0.35 ± 0.08
Y > 14625.28 × 10−40.988.05 × 10−4 ± 0.04−0.140.002−0.18 ± 0.07
FSRQs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL81−0.220.05−0.25 ± 0.13−0.200.08−0.29 ± 0.20
BL Lacs, historical sample
ALL844−0.649.6 × 10−97−0.28 ± 0.01−0.040.19−0.02 ± 0.03
Y ≤ 1726–0.583.3 × 10−65−0.22 ± 0.010.070.070.08 ± 0.04
Y > 1118−0.190.04−0.06 ± 0.02−0.170.07−0.21 ± 0.14
BL Lacs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL28−0.530.004−0.32 ± 0.08−0.180.37−0.22 ± 0.19
Y ≤ 111−0.540.09−0.20 ± 0.100.210.540.13 ± 0.27
Y > 117−0.030.90−0.14 ± 0.140.150.560.20 ± 0.31
in the comoving framelog (Y) versus log (ν)log (Lrad) versus log (ν)
ALL, δD-corrected sample180−0.100.17−0.03 ± 0.050.548.8 × 10−150.91 ± 0.09
FSRQs, Y > 1126−0.230.12−0.24 ± 0.080.404.4 × 10−60.89 ± 0.17
BL Lacs, Y > 1510.160.150.06 ± 0.050.768.8 × 10−150.95 ± 0.12
In the observers’ frameNlog (Y) versus log (νobs)|$\log (L_{{\rm rad}}^{{\rm obs}})~ {\rm versus}~ \log (\nu ^{{\rm {obs}}})$|
τpsτps
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ALL, historical sample1594−0.595.5 × 10−152−0.31 ± 0.009−0.482.0 × 10−91−0.35 ± 0.02
ALL, quasi-simultaneous sample109−0.180.06−0.34 ± 0.07−0.050.63−0.38 ± 0.12
FSRQs, historical sample
ALL750−0.0020.95−0.04 ± 0.04−0.147.8 × 10−5−0.29 ± 0.06
Y ≤ 1288−0.0050.93−0.02 ± 0.03−0.205.0 × 10−4−0.35 ± 0.08
Y > 14625.28 × 10−40.988.05 × 10−4 ± 0.04−0.140.002−0.18 ± 0.07
FSRQs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL81−0.220.05−0.25 ± 0.13−0.200.08−0.29 ± 0.20
BL Lacs, historical sample
ALL844−0.649.6 × 10−97−0.28 ± 0.01−0.040.19−0.02 ± 0.03
Y ≤ 1726–0.583.3 × 10−65−0.22 ± 0.010.070.070.08 ± 0.04
Y > 1118−0.190.04−0.06 ± 0.02−0.170.07−0.21 ± 0.14
BL Lacs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL28−0.530.004−0.32 ± 0.08−0.180.37−0.22 ± 0.19
Y ≤ 111−0.540.09−0.20 ± 0.100.210.540.13 ± 0.27
Y > 117−0.030.90−0.14 ± 0.140.150.560.20 ± 0.31
in the comoving framelog (Y) versus log (ν)log (Lrad) versus log (ν)
ALL, δD-corrected sample180−0.100.17−0.03 ± 0.050.548.8 × 10−150.91 ± 0.09
FSRQs, Y > 1126−0.230.12−0.24 ± 0.080.404.4 × 10−60.89 ± 0.17
BL Lacs, Y > 1510.160.150.06 ± 0.050.768.8 × 10−150.95 ± 0.12
Table 1.

Correlation results of historical, quasi-simultaneous and δD-corrected samples. Columns from left to right: (1): the sample studied in correlation analysis; (2): the number of blazars in the sample; (3) and (6) are the Spearman test correlation coefficients; (4) and (7) are the chance probabilities; (5) and (8) are the slopes of the best linear fitting equations.

In the observers’ frameNlog (Y) versus log (νobs)|$\log (L_{{\rm rad}}^{{\rm obs}})~ {\rm versus}~ \log (\nu ^{{\rm {obs}}})$|
τpsτps
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ALL, historical sample1594−0.595.5 × 10−152−0.31 ± 0.009−0.482.0 × 10−91−0.35 ± 0.02
ALL, quasi-simultaneous sample109−0.180.06−0.34 ± 0.07−0.050.63−0.38 ± 0.12
FSRQs, historical sample
ALL750−0.0020.95−0.04 ± 0.04−0.147.8 × 10−5−0.29 ± 0.06
Y ≤ 1288−0.0050.93−0.02 ± 0.03−0.205.0 × 10−4−0.35 ± 0.08
Y > 14625.28 × 10−40.988.05 × 10−4 ± 0.04−0.140.002−0.18 ± 0.07
FSRQs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL81−0.220.05−0.25 ± 0.13−0.200.08−0.29 ± 0.20
BL Lacs, historical sample
ALL844−0.649.6 × 10−97−0.28 ± 0.01−0.040.19−0.02 ± 0.03
Y ≤ 1726–0.583.3 × 10−65−0.22 ± 0.010.070.070.08 ± 0.04
Y > 1118−0.190.04−0.06 ± 0.02−0.170.07−0.21 ± 0.14
BL Lacs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL28−0.530.004−0.32 ± 0.08−0.180.37−0.22 ± 0.19
Y ≤ 111−0.540.09−0.20 ± 0.100.210.540.13 ± 0.27
Y > 117−0.030.90−0.14 ± 0.140.150.560.20 ± 0.31
in the comoving framelog (Y) versus log (ν)log (Lrad) versus log (ν)
ALL, δD-corrected sample180−0.100.17−0.03 ± 0.050.548.8 × 10−150.91 ± 0.09
FSRQs, Y > 1126−0.230.12−0.24 ± 0.080.404.4 × 10−60.89 ± 0.17
BL Lacs, Y > 1510.160.150.06 ± 0.050.768.8 × 10−150.95 ± 0.12
In the observers’ frameNlog (Y) versus log (νobs)|$\log (L_{{\rm rad}}^{{\rm obs}})~ {\rm versus}~ \log (\nu ^{{\rm {obs}}})$|
τpsτps
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
ALL, historical sample1594−0.595.5 × 10−152−0.31 ± 0.009−0.482.0 × 10−91−0.35 ± 0.02
ALL, quasi-simultaneous sample109−0.180.06−0.34 ± 0.07−0.050.63−0.38 ± 0.12
FSRQs, historical sample
ALL750−0.0020.95−0.04 ± 0.04−0.147.8 × 10−5−0.29 ± 0.06
Y ≤ 1288−0.0050.93−0.02 ± 0.03−0.205.0 × 10−4−0.35 ± 0.08
Y > 14625.28 × 10−40.988.05 × 10−4 ± 0.04−0.140.002−0.18 ± 0.07
FSRQs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL81−0.220.05−0.25 ± 0.13−0.200.08−0.29 ± 0.20
BL Lacs, historical sample
ALL844−0.649.6 × 10−97−0.28 ± 0.01−0.040.19−0.02 ± 0.03
Y ≤ 1726–0.583.3 × 10−65−0.22 ± 0.010.070.070.08 ± 0.04
Y > 1118−0.190.04−0.06 ± 0.02−0.170.07−0.21 ± 0.14
BL Lacs, quasi-simultaneous sample
ALL28−0.530.004−0.32 ± 0.08−0.180.37−0.22 ± 0.19
Y ≤ 111−0.540.09−0.20 ± 0.100.210.540.13 ± 0.27
Y > 117−0.030.90−0.14 ± 0.140.150.560.20 ± 0.31
in the comoving framelog (Y) versus log (ν)log (Lrad) versus log (ν)
ALL, δD-corrected sample180−0.100.17−0.03 ± 0.050.548.8 × 10−150.91 ± 0.09
FSRQs, Y > 1126−0.230.12−0.24 ± 0.080.404.4 × 10−60.89 ± 0.17
BL Lacs, Y > 1510.160.150.06 ± 0.050.768.8 × 10−150.95 ± 0.12
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close