Table 2

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis in the Propensity Score Matched Sample (n = 480): The Predictor Effects on the Prevalence of Morphometric Vertebral Fractures

Multivariable analysis
CharacteristicOR (95% CI)pa
Age1.09 (1.05–1.13)<.001
Previous fractures<.001
No1
Yes4.47 (2.65–7.63)
Total hip BMD, (g/cm2)0.18 (0.02–2.11).17
AI group.18
AI naïve1
AI treated0.59 (0.27–1.26)
Body composition.43
Group A: LBM− and FBM−1
Group B: LBM− and FBM+0.45 (0.13–1.32)
Group C: LBM+ and FBM−0.42 (0.12–1.26)
Group D: LBM+ and FBM+0.45 (0.19–1.05)
AI group * body composition.003
AI naïve/Group A1
AI treated/Group B11.72 (2.68–57.29)
AI treated/Group C6.79 (1.52–33.14)
AI treated/Group D2.2 (0.71–6.98)
Multivariable analysis
CharacteristicOR (95% CI)pa
Age1.09 (1.05–1.13)<.001
Previous fractures<.001
No1
Yes4.47 (2.65–7.63)
Total hip BMD, (g/cm2)0.18 (0.02–2.11).17
AI group.18
AI naïve1
AI treated0.59 (0.27–1.26)
Body composition.43
Group A: LBM− and FBM−1
Group B: LBM− and FBM+0.45 (0.13–1.32)
Group C: LBM+ and FBM−0.42 (0.12–1.26)
Group D: LBM+ and FBM+0.45 (0.19–1.05)
AI group * body composition.003
AI naïve/Group A1
AI treated/Group B11.72 (2.68–57.29)
AI treated/Group C6.79 (1.52–33.14)
AI treated/Group D2.2 (0.71–6.98)

Results are expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

AI = aromatase inhibitor; BMD = bone mineral density; FBM− = fat body mass < median value; FBM+ = fat body mass ≥ median value; LMB− = lean body mass < median value; LBM+ = lean body mass ≥ median value.

a

Likelihood ratio p value adjusted for multiple comparisons.

Table 2

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis in the Propensity Score Matched Sample (n = 480): The Predictor Effects on the Prevalence of Morphometric Vertebral Fractures

Multivariable analysis
CharacteristicOR (95% CI)pa
Age1.09 (1.05–1.13)<.001
Previous fractures<.001
No1
Yes4.47 (2.65–7.63)
Total hip BMD, (g/cm2)0.18 (0.02–2.11).17
AI group.18
AI naïve1
AI treated0.59 (0.27–1.26)
Body composition.43
Group A: LBM− and FBM−1
Group B: LBM− and FBM+0.45 (0.13–1.32)
Group C: LBM+ and FBM−0.42 (0.12–1.26)
Group D: LBM+ and FBM+0.45 (0.19–1.05)
AI group * body composition.003
AI naïve/Group A1
AI treated/Group B11.72 (2.68–57.29)
AI treated/Group C6.79 (1.52–33.14)
AI treated/Group D2.2 (0.71–6.98)
Multivariable analysis
CharacteristicOR (95% CI)pa
Age1.09 (1.05–1.13)<.001
Previous fractures<.001
No1
Yes4.47 (2.65–7.63)
Total hip BMD, (g/cm2)0.18 (0.02–2.11).17
AI group.18
AI naïve1
AI treated0.59 (0.27–1.26)
Body composition.43
Group A: LBM− and FBM−1
Group B: LBM− and FBM+0.45 (0.13–1.32)
Group C: LBM+ and FBM−0.42 (0.12–1.26)
Group D: LBM+ and FBM+0.45 (0.19–1.05)
AI group * body composition.003
AI naïve/Group A1
AI treated/Group B11.72 (2.68–57.29)
AI treated/Group C6.79 (1.52–33.14)
AI treated/Group D2.2 (0.71–6.98)

Results are expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

AI = aromatase inhibitor; BMD = bone mineral density; FBM− = fat body mass < median value; FBM+ = fat body mass ≥ median value; LMB− = lean body mass < median value; LBM+ = lean body mass ≥ median value.

a

Likelihood ratio p value adjusted for multiple comparisons.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close