Table 6.

Divergent validity of social media mindsets and problematic social media use, general self-efficacy, and trait optimism

Fit indices
MindsetModel typeVariablechi-squaredCFITLIRMSEASRMR
Agency mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1457.85***.80.79.13.07
One-factorsocial media use1756.85***.75.73.14.08
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy268.08**.92.90.10.07
One-factor911.05***.65.56.20.17
Two-factorTrait optimism298.16***.88.84.13.06
One-factor857.93***.60.50.24.20
Valence mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1405.82***.82.80.11.07
One-factorsocial media use2416.20***.66.63.16.15
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy214.47**.96.95.07.05
One-factor1233.80***.59.53.20.20
Two-factorTrait optimism248.48***.93.91.09.06
One-factor1323.86***.48.38.24.21
Fit indices
MindsetModel typeVariablechi-squaredCFITLIRMSEASRMR
Agency mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1457.85***.80.79.13.07
One-factorsocial media use1756.85***.75.73.14.08
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy268.08**.92.90.10.07
One-factor911.05***.65.56.20.17
Two-factorTrait optimism298.16***.88.84.13.06
One-factor857.93***.60.50.24.20
Valence mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1405.82***.82.80.11.07
One-factorsocial media use2416.20***.66.63.16.15
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy214.47**.96.95.07.05
One-factor1233.80***.59.53.20.20
Two-factorTrait optimism248.48***.93.91.09.06
One-factor1323.86***.48.38.24.21

Note. Results of divergent validity analyses for social media mindsets constructed using latent variable modeling. To test whether agency and valence mindsets were distinct from problematic social media use (Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al., 2016), general self-efficacy (New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Chen et al., 2001), and trait optimism (Revised Orientation to Life Test, Scheier et al., 1994), we compared structural equation models that treated mindsets as either a distinct construct from each measure (the two factor model) or as a reflection of a preexisting construct (the one factor model). Five model fit indices were used to compare models: chi-square test (goodness of fit of factor model), CFI (Comparative Fit Index, higher scores indicate better fit), TLI (Tucker–Lewis Index, higher scores indicate better fit), RMSEA (root mean squared error of approximation, lower scores indicate better fit), and SRMR (standardized root mean square residual, lower scores indicate better fit). Two-factor models treating social media mindsets as distinct constructs were better fitting on all indices. All models were constructed using the lavaan package in R.

Table 6.

Divergent validity of social media mindsets and problematic social media use, general self-efficacy, and trait optimism

Fit indices
MindsetModel typeVariablechi-squaredCFITLIRMSEASRMR
Agency mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1457.85***.80.79.13.07
One-factorsocial media use1756.85***.75.73.14.08
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy268.08**.92.90.10.07
One-factor911.05***.65.56.20.17
Two-factorTrait optimism298.16***.88.84.13.06
One-factor857.93***.60.50.24.20
Valence mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1405.82***.82.80.11.07
One-factorsocial media use2416.20***.66.63.16.15
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy214.47**.96.95.07.05
One-factor1233.80***.59.53.20.20
Two-factorTrait optimism248.48***.93.91.09.06
One-factor1323.86***.48.38.24.21
Fit indices
MindsetModel typeVariablechi-squaredCFITLIRMSEASRMR
Agency mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1457.85***.80.79.13.07
One-factorsocial media use1756.85***.75.73.14.08
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy268.08**.92.90.10.07
One-factor911.05***.65.56.20.17
Two-factorTrait optimism298.16***.88.84.13.06
One-factor857.93***.60.50.24.20
Valence mindsetTwo-factorProblematic1405.82***.82.80.11.07
One-factorsocial media use2416.20***.66.63.16.15
Two-factorGeneral self-efficacy214.47**.96.95.07.05
One-factor1233.80***.59.53.20.20
Two-factorTrait optimism248.48***.93.91.09.06
One-factor1323.86***.48.38.24.21

Note. Results of divergent validity analyses for social media mindsets constructed using latent variable modeling. To test whether agency and valence mindsets were distinct from problematic social media use (Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, Andreassen et al., 2016), general self-efficacy (New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Chen et al., 2001), and trait optimism (Revised Orientation to Life Test, Scheier et al., 1994), we compared structural equation models that treated mindsets as either a distinct construct from each measure (the two factor model) or as a reflection of a preexisting construct (the one factor model). Five model fit indices were used to compare models: chi-square test (goodness of fit of factor model), CFI (Comparative Fit Index, higher scores indicate better fit), TLI (Tucker–Lewis Index, higher scores indicate better fit), RMSEA (root mean squared error of approximation, lower scores indicate better fit), and SRMR (standardized root mean square residual, lower scores indicate better fit). Two-factor models treating social media mindsets as distinct constructs were better fitting on all indices. All models were constructed using the lavaan package in R.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close