Table 5.

Propensity score analysis. Evaluation of the association between IVIG plus high or low dose corticosteroids in relation of the following outcomes: clinical worsening, need for intensive care, ventilatory support, vasoactive agents use, heart disease at last follow-up and length of hospitalization

Before IPTW propensity method
After IPTW propensity method
IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 127)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 48)OR (95% CI)IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 159.5)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 146.9)ORa(95% CI)
OUTCOME
At least one worsening/poor response,n (%)42 (33.1)28 (58.3)0.4 (0.2, 0.7)55.8 (35.0)86.3 (58.8)0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Need for intensive care,n (%)31 (24.4)14 (29.2)0.7 (0.4, 1.6)39.4 (24.7)32.9 (22.4)1.2 (0.7, 2.1)
Need for ventilatory support,n (%)22 (17.3)10 (20.8)0.8 (0.3, 1.8)28.0 (17.5)27.6 (18.8)0.6 (0.3, 1.2)
Need for vasoactive agentsn (%)19 (15.0)3 (6.3)2.3 (0.7, 7.8)20.9 (13.1)9.9 (6.7)2.4 (1.1, 5.4)
Heart disease at the last follow-up,n (%)50 (39.4)15 (31.3)1.4 (0.7, 2.9)64.8 (40.6)53.4 (36.3)1.2 (0.7, 1.9)
Length of hospitalization >11 days,n (%)46 (36.2)32 (66.7)0.3 (0.1, 0.6)59.8 (37.5)93.3 (63.5)0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
Before IPTW propensity method
After IPTW propensity method
IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 127)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 48)OR (95% CI)IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 159.5)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 146.9)ORa(95% CI)
OUTCOME
At least one worsening/poor response,n (%)42 (33.1)28 (58.3)0.4 (0.2, 0.7)55.8 (35.0)86.3 (58.8)0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Need for intensive care,n (%)31 (24.4)14 (29.2)0.7 (0.4, 1.6)39.4 (24.7)32.9 (22.4)1.2 (0.7, 2.1)
Need for ventilatory support,n (%)22 (17.3)10 (20.8)0.8 (0.3, 1.8)28.0 (17.5)27.6 (18.8)0.6 (0.3, 1.2)
Need for vasoactive agentsn (%)19 (15.0)3 (6.3)2.3 (0.7, 7.8)20.9 (13.1)9.9 (6.7)2.4 (1.1, 5.4)
Heart disease at the last follow-up,n (%)50 (39.4)15 (31.3)1.4 (0.7, 2.9)64.8 (40.6)53.4 (36.3)1.2 (0.7, 1.9)
Length of hospitalization >11 days,n (%)46 (36.2)32 (66.7)0.3 (0.1, 0.6)59.8 (37.5)93.3 (63.5)0.3 (0.2, 0.5)

IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; OR, odds ratio.

a

Adjusted by sex and ethnicity.

Table 5.

Propensity score analysis. Evaluation of the association between IVIG plus high or low dose corticosteroids in relation of the following outcomes: clinical worsening, need for intensive care, ventilatory support, vasoactive agents use, heart disease at last follow-up and length of hospitalization

Before IPTW propensity method
After IPTW propensity method
IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 127)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 48)OR (95% CI)IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 159.5)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 146.9)ORa(95% CI)
OUTCOME
At least one worsening/poor response,n (%)42 (33.1)28 (58.3)0.4 (0.2, 0.7)55.8 (35.0)86.3 (58.8)0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Need for intensive care,n (%)31 (24.4)14 (29.2)0.7 (0.4, 1.6)39.4 (24.7)32.9 (22.4)1.2 (0.7, 2.1)
Need for ventilatory support,n (%)22 (17.3)10 (20.8)0.8 (0.3, 1.8)28.0 (17.5)27.6 (18.8)0.6 (0.3, 1.2)
Need for vasoactive agentsn (%)19 (15.0)3 (6.3)2.3 (0.7, 7.8)20.9 (13.1)9.9 (6.7)2.4 (1.1, 5.4)
Heart disease at the last follow-up,n (%)50 (39.4)15 (31.3)1.4 (0.7, 2.9)64.8 (40.6)53.4 (36.3)1.2 (0.7, 1.9)
Length of hospitalization >11 days,n (%)46 (36.2)32 (66.7)0.3 (0.1, 0.6)59.8 (37.5)93.3 (63.5)0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
Before IPTW propensity method
After IPTW propensity method
IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 127)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 48)OR (95% CI)IVIG + high-dose CSs (n = 159.5)IVIG + low-dose CSs (n = 146.9)ORa(95% CI)
OUTCOME
At least one worsening/poor response,n (%)42 (33.1)28 (58.3)0.4 (0.2, 0.7)55.8 (35.0)86.3 (58.8)0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Need for intensive care,n (%)31 (24.4)14 (29.2)0.7 (0.4, 1.6)39.4 (24.7)32.9 (22.4)1.2 (0.7, 2.1)
Need for ventilatory support,n (%)22 (17.3)10 (20.8)0.8 (0.3, 1.8)28.0 (17.5)27.6 (18.8)0.6 (0.3, 1.2)
Need for vasoactive agentsn (%)19 (15.0)3 (6.3)2.3 (0.7, 7.8)20.9 (13.1)9.9 (6.7)2.4 (1.1, 5.4)
Heart disease at the last follow-up,n (%)50 (39.4)15 (31.3)1.4 (0.7, 2.9)64.8 (40.6)53.4 (36.3)1.2 (0.7, 1.9)
Length of hospitalization >11 days,n (%)46 (36.2)32 (66.7)0.3 (0.1, 0.6)59.8 (37.5)93.3 (63.5)0.3 (0.2, 0.5)

IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; OR, odds ratio.

a

Adjusted by sex and ethnicity.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close