TABLE 3

The averaged community detection errors of competing methods over 50 independent replications with their standard errors in Example 3.

μSBIMSCMMLELSELMFCOR
2formula0.2365(0.0129)formulaformula0.2441(0.0069)0.3887(0.0033)
3formula0.2627(0.0126)0.0084(0.0049)0.0091(0.0052)0.2705(0.0164)0.3886(0.0032)
4formula0.3088(0.0116)0.0405(0.0085)0.0532(0.0104)0.3395(0.0111)0.3897(0.0032)
5formula0.3638(0.0081)0.1279(0.0170)0.2120(0.0177)0.3939(0.0065)0.3900(0.0032)
μSBIMSCMMLELSELMFCOR
2formula0.2365(0.0129)formulaformula0.2441(0.0069)0.3887(0.0033)
3formula0.2627(0.0126)0.0084(0.0049)0.0091(0.0052)0.2705(0.0164)0.3886(0.0032)
4formula0.3088(0.0116)0.0405(0.0085)0.0532(0.0104)0.3395(0.0111)0.3897(0.0032)
5formula0.3638(0.0081)0.1279(0.0170)0.2120(0.0177)0.3939(0.0065)0.3900(0.0032)

Note: The best performer in each case is bold-faced.

TABLE 3

The averaged community detection errors of competing methods over 50 independent replications with their standard errors in Example 3.

μSBIMSCMMLELSELMFCOR
2formula0.2365(0.0129)formulaformula0.2441(0.0069)0.3887(0.0033)
3formula0.2627(0.0126)0.0084(0.0049)0.0091(0.0052)0.2705(0.0164)0.3886(0.0032)
4formula0.3088(0.0116)0.0405(0.0085)0.0532(0.0104)0.3395(0.0111)0.3897(0.0032)
5formula0.3638(0.0081)0.1279(0.0170)0.2120(0.0177)0.3939(0.0065)0.3900(0.0032)
μSBIMSCMMLELSELMFCOR
2formula0.2365(0.0129)formulaformula0.2441(0.0069)0.3887(0.0033)
3formula0.2627(0.0126)0.0084(0.0049)0.0091(0.0052)0.2705(0.0164)0.3886(0.0032)
4formula0.3088(0.0116)0.0405(0.0085)0.0532(0.0104)0.3395(0.0111)0.3897(0.0032)
5formula0.3638(0.0081)0.1279(0.0170)0.2120(0.0177)0.3939(0.0065)0.3900(0.0032)

Note: The best performer in each case is bold-faced.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close