Detection experiment results. In experiment 1 all frogs were presented scaled to a common size (35 mm) and in experiment 2 frogs were presented at their natural sizes (S = 20 mm, M = 35 mm, L = 50 mm) relative to the background.
Experiment 1 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 529.98, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 1.36, p = 0.836 | z = −0.18, p > 0.999 | z = −1.16, p = 0.926 | z = −1.22, p = 0.904 |
S – L | z = 3.29, p = 0.011 | z = −3.47, p = 0.006 | z = −7.55, p < 0.001 | z = −5.96, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 1.96, p = 0.407 | z = −3.28, p = 0.012 | z = −6.35, p < 0.001 | z = −4.75, p < 0.001 |
Experiment 1 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 529.98, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 1.36, p = 0.836 | z = −0.18, p > 0.999 | z = −1.16, p = 0.926 | z = −1.22, p = 0.904 |
S – L | z = 3.29, p = 0.011 | z = −3.47, p = 0.006 | z = −7.55, p < 0.001 | z = −5.96, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 1.96, p = 0.407 | z = −3.28, p = 0.012 | z = −6.35, p < 0.001 | z = −4.75, p < 0.001 |
Experiment 2 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 689.53, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 5.96, p < 0.001 | z = 9.02, p < 0.001 | z = 5.48, p < 0.001 | z = 7.31, p < 0.001 |
S – L | z = 8.50, p < 0.001 | z = 11.59, p < 0.001 | z = 4.38, p < 0.001 | z = 7.91, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 2.83, p = 0.051 | z = 2.61, p = 0.095 | z = −1.05, p = 0.957 | z = 0.62, p = 0.999 |
Experiment 2 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 689.53, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 5.96, p < 0.001 | z = 9.02, p < 0.001 | z = 5.48, p < 0.001 | z = 7.31, p < 0.001 |
S – L | z = 8.50, p < 0.001 | z = 11.59, p < 0.001 | z = 4.38, p < 0.001 | z = 7.91, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 2.83, p = 0.051 | z = 2.61, p = 0.095 | z = −1.05, p = 0.957 | z = 0.62, p = 0.999 |
Note: Treatment codes: Size class (S = small, M = medium, L = large) and colour manipulations (A = dorsal only, B = dorsal and spots, C = dorsal and stripe, D = dorsal, spot, and stripe). Results from fitted generalized linear mixed effects models, and pairwise general linear hypothesis tests. Pairwise comparisons where p < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.
Detection experiment results. In experiment 1 all frogs were presented scaled to a common size (35 mm) and in experiment 2 frogs were presented at their natural sizes (S = 20 mm, M = 35 mm, L = 50 mm) relative to the background.
Experiment 1 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 529.98, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 1.36, p = 0.836 | z = −0.18, p > 0.999 | z = −1.16, p = 0.926 | z = −1.22, p = 0.904 |
S – L | z = 3.29, p = 0.011 | z = −3.47, p = 0.006 | z = −7.55, p < 0.001 | z = −5.96, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 1.96, p = 0.407 | z = −3.28, p = 0.012 | z = −6.35, p < 0.001 | z = −4.75, p < 0.001 |
Experiment 1 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 529.98, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 1.36, p = 0.836 | z = −0.18, p > 0.999 | z = −1.16, p = 0.926 | z = −1.22, p = 0.904 |
S – L | z = 3.29, p = 0.011 | z = −3.47, p = 0.006 | z = −7.55, p < 0.001 | z = −5.96, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 1.96, p = 0.407 | z = −3.28, p = 0.012 | z = −6.35, p < 0.001 | z = −4.75, p < 0.001 |
Experiment 2 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 689.53, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 5.96, p < 0.001 | z = 9.02, p < 0.001 | z = 5.48, p < 0.001 | z = 7.31, p < 0.001 |
S – L | z = 8.50, p < 0.001 | z = 11.59, p < 0.001 | z = 4.38, p < 0.001 | z = 7.91, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 2.83, p = 0.051 | z = 2.61, p = 0.095 | z = −1.05, p = 0.957 | z = 0.62, p = 0.999 |
Experiment 2 | ||||
Main effect of treatment: χ2 = 689.53, df = 11, p < 0.001 | ||||
A | B | C | D | |
S – M | z = 5.96, p < 0.001 | z = 9.02, p < 0.001 | z = 5.48, p < 0.001 | z = 7.31, p < 0.001 |
S – L | z = 8.50, p < 0.001 | z = 11.59, p < 0.001 | z = 4.38, p < 0.001 | z = 7.91, p < 0.001 |
M – L | z = 2.83, p = 0.051 | z = 2.61, p = 0.095 | z = −1.05, p = 0.957 | z = 0.62, p = 0.999 |
Note: Treatment codes: Size class (S = small, M = medium, L = large) and colour manipulations (A = dorsal only, B = dorsal and spots, C = dorsal and stripe, D = dorsal, spot, and stripe). Results from fitted generalized linear mixed effects models, and pairwise general linear hypothesis tests. Pairwise comparisons where p < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.