. | Model (1) main model . | Model (2) Separate prod. functions, no endogeneity . | Model (3) Joint prod. function . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM on yields . | Conventional . | Low-input . | Conventional . | Low-input . | All . |
Work and machinery | −1.32 | 5.71** | −0.02 | 4.05 | 4.99** |
Fertilizers | −7.93 | −7.85 | −0.28 | −0.99 | 1.65 |
Mechanical pest control | −0.003 | −0.009 | −0.003 | −0.008 | −0.005** |
Herbicide | 0.58* | −8.32** | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.11 |
Fungicide | −0.99* | 0.95 | 3.31*** |
. | Model (1) main model . | Model (2) Separate prod. functions, no endogeneity . | Model (3) Joint prod. function . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM on yields . | Conventional . | Low-input . | Conventional . | Low-input . | All . |
Work and machinery | −1.32 | 5.71** | −0.02 | 4.05 | 4.99** |
Fertilizers | −7.93 | −7.85 | −0.28 | −0.99 | 1.65 |
Mechanical pest control | −0.003 | −0.009 | −0.003 | −0.008 | −0.005** |
Herbicide | 0.58* | −8.32** | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.11 |
Fungicide | −0.99* | 0.95 | 3.31*** |
Note: *P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01.
Given the non-linear functional form of our production function, we cannot compute the marginal effect of inputs on yields. We need to consider the marginal effect at the mean, that is, we consider the effect on yields when increasing the quantity of a particular input when other variables equal the sample average. As such, coefficients’ direct interpretation is difficult as they heavily depend on other variables values.
. | Model (1) main model . | Model (2) Separate prod. functions, no endogeneity . | Model (3) Joint prod. function . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM on yields . | Conventional . | Low-input . | Conventional . | Low-input . | All . |
Work and machinery | −1.32 | 5.71** | −0.02 | 4.05 | 4.99** |
Fertilizers | −7.93 | −7.85 | −0.28 | −0.99 | 1.65 |
Mechanical pest control | −0.003 | −0.009 | −0.003 | −0.008 | −0.005** |
Herbicide | 0.58* | −8.32** | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.11 |
Fungicide | −0.99* | 0.95 | 3.31*** |
. | Model (1) main model . | Model (2) Separate prod. functions, no endogeneity . | Model (3) Joint prod. function . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM on yields . | Conventional . | Low-input . | Conventional . | Low-input . | All . |
Work and machinery | −1.32 | 5.71** | −0.02 | 4.05 | 4.99** |
Fertilizers | −7.93 | −7.85 | −0.28 | −0.99 | 1.65 |
Mechanical pest control | −0.003 | −0.009 | −0.003 | −0.008 | −0.005** |
Herbicide | 0.58* | −8.32** | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.11 |
Fungicide | −0.99* | 0.95 | 3.31*** |
Note: *P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01.
Given the non-linear functional form of our production function, we cannot compute the marginal effect of inputs on yields. We need to consider the marginal effect at the mean, that is, we consider the effect on yields when increasing the quantity of a particular input when other variables equal the sample average. As such, coefficients’ direct interpretation is difficult as they heavily depend on other variables values.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.