| Species name . | Strain . | 16S rRNA relative abundance (%)a . | gyrA3 relative abundance (%) . | tuf2 relative abundance (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. altitudinis | G6S2 | 108.89 ± 7.01 | 84.75 ± 9.60 | 222.77 ± 13.63 |
| B. amyloliquefaciens | B12 | 0 | 186.00 ± 9.16 | 0 |
| B. cereus | ATCC14579 | 383.84 ± 93.61 | 0 | 0 |
| B. licheniformis | D9_B_45 | 129.81 ± 38.08 | 58.93 ± 32.96 | 107.72 ± 13.26 |
| B. mycoides | SIN1.1 | 0 | 0 | 43.33 ± 3.68 |
| B. pumilus | Monterrea_S2 | 0 | 240.93 ± 23.27 | 42.38 ± 2.54 |
| B. safensis | G6S3 | 0.76 ± 0.43 | 339.09 ± 30.29 | 5.70 ± 0.47 |
| B. subtilis | PS216 | 0 | 0 | 93.03 ± 16.36 |
| B. thuringiensis | 407 | 0 | 24.73 ± 5.74 | 120.93 ± 7.61 |
| B. velezensis | SQR9 | 309.08 ± 70.36 | 1.19 ± 1.69 | 84.77 ± 12.88 |
| Priestia megaterium | B10 | 0 | 38.82 ± 6.62 | 152.06 ± 8.00 |
| Species name . | Strain . | 16S rRNA relative abundance (%)a . | gyrA3 relative abundance (%) . | tuf2 relative abundance (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. altitudinis | G6S2 | 108.89 ± 7.01 | 84.75 ± 9.60 | 222.77 ± 13.63 |
| B. amyloliquefaciens | B12 | 0 | 186.00 ± 9.16 | 0 |
| B. cereus | ATCC14579 | 383.84 ± 93.61 | 0 | 0 |
| B. licheniformis | D9_B_45 | 129.81 ± 38.08 | 58.93 ± 32.96 | 107.72 ± 13.26 |
| B. mycoides | SIN1.1 | 0 | 0 | 43.33 ± 3.68 |
| B. pumilus | Monterrea_S2 | 0 | 240.93 ± 23.27 | 42.38 ± 2.54 |
| B. safensis | G6S3 | 0.76 ± 0.43 | 339.09 ± 30.29 | 5.70 ± 0.47 |
| B. subtilis | PS216 | 0 | 0 | 93.03 ± 16.36 |
| B. thuringiensis | 407 | 0 | 24.73 ± 5.74 | 120.93 ± 7.61 |
| B. velezensis | SQR9 | 309.08 ± 70.36 | 1.19 ± 1.69 | 84.77 ± 12.88 |
| Priestia megaterium | B10 | 0 | 38.82 ± 6.62 | 152.06 ± 8.00 |
Estimation values for tuf relative abundance versus theoretical abundance are given as mean ± standard deviation, where 100% is the expected value.
| Species name . | Strain . | 16S rRNA relative abundance (%)a . | gyrA3 relative abundance (%) . | tuf2 relative abundance (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. altitudinis | G6S2 | 108.89 ± 7.01 | 84.75 ± 9.60 | 222.77 ± 13.63 |
| B. amyloliquefaciens | B12 | 0 | 186.00 ± 9.16 | 0 |
| B. cereus | ATCC14579 | 383.84 ± 93.61 | 0 | 0 |
| B. licheniformis | D9_B_45 | 129.81 ± 38.08 | 58.93 ± 32.96 | 107.72 ± 13.26 |
| B. mycoides | SIN1.1 | 0 | 0 | 43.33 ± 3.68 |
| B. pumilus | Monterrea_S2 | 0 | 240.93 ± 23.27 | 42.38 ± 2.54 |
| B. safensis | G6S3 | 0.76 ± 0.43 | 339.09 ± 30.29 | 5.70 ± 0.47 |
| B. subtilis | PS216 | 0 | 0 | 93.03 ± 16.36 |
| B. thuringiensis | 407 | 0 | 24.73 ± 5.74 | 120.93 ± 7.61 |
| B. velezensis | SQR9 | 309.08 ± 70.36 | 1.19 ± 1.69 | 84.77 ± 12.88 |
| Priestia megaterium | B10 | 0 | 38.82 ± 6.62 | 152.06 ± 8.00 |
| Species name . | Strain . | 16S rRNA relative abundance (%)a . | gyrA3 relative abundance (%) . | tuf2 relative abundance (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. altitudinis | G6S2 | 108.89 ± 7.01 | 84.75 ± 9.60 | 222.77 ± 13.63 |
| B. amyloliquefaciens | B12 | 0 | 186.00 ± 9.16 | 0 |
| B. cereus | ATCC14579 | 383.84 ± 93.61 | 0 | 0 |
| B. licheniformis | D9_B_45 | 129.81 ± 38.08 | 58.93 ± 32.96 | 107.72 ± 13.26 |
| B. mycoides | SIN1.1 | 0 | 0 | 43.33 ± 3.68 |
| B. pumilus | Monterrea_S2 | 0 | 240.93 ± 23.27 | 42.38 ± 2.54 |
| B. safensis | G6S3 | 0.76 ± 0.43 | 339.09 ± 30.29 | 5.70 ± 0.47 |
| B. subtilis | PS216 | 0 | 0 | 93.03 ± 16.36 |
| B. thuringiensis | 407 | 0 | 24.73 ± 5.74 | 120.93 ± 7.61 |
| B. velezensis | SQR9 | 309.08 ± 70.36 | 1.19 ± 1.69 | 84.77 ± 12.88 |
| Priestia megaterium | B10 | 0 | 38.82 ± 6.62 | 152.06 ± 8.00 |
Estimation values for tuf relative abundance versus theoretical abundance are given as mean ± standard deviation, where 100% is the expected value.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
