Table 3

Number and percentage of patients with specific visit reports/notes during the first 12 months after initiation of rhythm control therapy

ECG (n/%)Cardiac monitor (n/%)ECG or cardiac monitor (n/%)Clinical note (n/%)Total (n/%)
Ablation
 site 1 (= 366)307 (83.9%)274 (74.9%)346 (94.5%)365 (99.7%)365 (99.7%)
 site 2 (n = 621)579 (93.2%)543 (87.4%)614 (98.9%)621 (100%)621 (100%)
Antiarrhythmic medication
 site 1 (n = 8979)6898 (76.8%)2487 (27.7%)7111 (79.2%)8343 (92.9%)8360 (93.1%)
 site 2 (n = 10 862)8244 (75.9%)2826 (26.0%)8611 (79.3%)9814 (90.4%)9921 (91.03%)
Cardioversion
 site 1 (n = 3264)2761 (84.6%)995 (30.5%)2795 (85.6%)3191 (97.8%)3193 (97.8%)
 site 2 (n = 4564)4098 (89.8%)1298 (28.4%)4178 (91.5%)4465 (97.8%)4516 (98.9%)
Pacemaker combined with nodal ablation
 site 1 (n = 63)44 (69.8%)35 (55.6%)49 (77.8%)62 (98.4%)62 (98.4%)
 site 2 (n = 13)8 (61.5%)1 (7.7%)8 (61.5%)13 (100%)13 (100%)
ECG (n/%)Cardiac monitor (n/%)ECG or cardiac monitor (n/%)Clinical note (n/%)Total (n/%)
Ablation
 site 1 (= 366)307 (83.9%)274 (74.9%)346 (94.5%)365 (99.7%)365 (99.7%)
 site 2 (n = 621)579 (93.2%)543 (87.4%)614 (98.9%)621 (100%)621 (100%)
Antiarrhythmic medication
 site 1 (n = 8979)6898 (76.8%)2487 (27.7%)7111 (79.2%)8343 (92.9%)8360 (93.1%)
 site 2 (n = 10 862)8244 (75.9%)2826 (26.0%)8611 (79.3%)9814 (90.4%)9921 (91.03%)
Cardioversion
 site 1 (n = 3264)2761 (84.6%)995 (30.5%)2795 (85.6%)3191 (97.8%)3193 (97.8%)
 site 2 (n = 4564)4098 (89.8%)1298 (28.4%)4178 (91.5%)4465 (97.8%)4516 (98.9%)
Pacemaker combined with nodal ablation
 site 1 (n = 63)44 (69.8%)35 (55.6%)49 (77.8%)62 (98.4%)62 (98.4%)
 site 2 (n = 13)8 (61.5%)1 (7.7%)8 (61.5%)13 (100%)13 (100%)

ECG = electrocardiogram.

Table 3

Number and percentage of patients with specific visit reports/notes during the first 12 months after initiation of rhythm control therapy

ECG (n/%)Cardiac monitor (n/%)ECG or cardiac monitor (n/%)Clinical note (n/%)Total (n/%)
Ablation
 site 1 (= 366)307 (83.9%)274 (74.9%)346 (94.5%)365 (99.7%)365 (99.7%)
 site 2 (n = 621)579 (93.2%)543 (87.4%)614 (98.9%)621 (100%)621 (100%)
Antiarrhythmic medication
 site 1 (n = 8979)6898 (76.8%)2487 (27.7%)7111 (79.2%)8343 (92.9%)8360 (93.1%)
 site 2 (n = 10 862)8244 (75.9%)2826 (26.0%)8611 (79.3%)9814 (90.4%)9921 (91.03%)
Cardioversion
 site 1 (n = 3264)2761 (84.6%)995 (30.5%)2795 (85.6%)3191 (97.8%)3193 (97.8%)
 site 2 (n = 4564)4098 (89.8%)1298 (28.4%)4178 (91.5%)4465 (97.8%)4516 (98.9%)
Pacemaker combined with nodal ablation
 site 1 (n = 63)44 (69.8%)35 (55.6%)49 (77.8%)62 (98.4%)62 (98.4%)
 site 2 (n = 13)8 (61.5%)1 (7.7%)8 (61.5%)13 (100%)13 (100%)
ECG (n/%)Cardiac monitor (n/%)ECG or cardiac monitor (n/%)Clinical note (n/%)Total (n/%)
Ablation
 site 1 (= 366)307 (83.9%)274 (74.9%)346 (94.5%)365 (99.7%)365 (99.7%)
 site 2 (n = 621)579 (93.2%)543 (87.4%)614 (98.9%)621 (100%)621 (100%)
Antiarrhythmic medication
 site 1 (n = 8979)6898 (76.8%)2487 (27.7%)7111 (79.2%)8343 (92.9%)8360 (93.1%)
 site 2 (n = 10 862)8244 (75.9%)2826 (26.0%)8611 (79.3%)9814 (90.4%)9921 (91.03%)
Cardioversion
 site 1 (n = 3264)2761 (84.6%)995 (30.5%)2795 (85.6%)3191 (97.8%)3193 (97.8%)
 site 2 (n = 4564)4098 (89.8%)1298 (28.4%)4178 (91.5%)4465 (97.8%)4516 (98.9%)
Pacemaker combined with nodal ablation
 site 1 (n = 63)44 (69.8%)35 (55.6%)49 (77.8%)62 (98.4%)62 (98.4%)
 site 2 (n = 13)8 (61.5%)1 (7.7%)8 (61.5%)13 (100%)13 (100%)

ECG = electrocardiogram.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close