WSL-Index median score in affected incisors at T1 and T3: the mean value (M), standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) and median value are given for the different incisor types.
| . | . | T1 . | T3 . | T1 vs. T3 . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n . | WSL-Index median score . | n . | WSL-Index median score . | |||||||||
| M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | P . | ||||
| Incisors exhibiting a WSL | Total | 81 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 1.2–1.4 | 1.0 | 71 | 0.9 | 0.87 | 0.7–1.1 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 16 | 1.1 | 1.29 | 0.4–1.8 | 1.0 | .065 | |
| Tooth 11 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.4 | 0.55 | −0.3–1.1 | 0.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 21 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.2–1.4 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 22 | 22 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.1–1.5 | 1.0 | 19 | 0.8 | 0.71 | 0.4–1.1 | 1.0 | .006 | |
| Tooth 32 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.75 | 0.0–1.6 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 8 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 9 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.1 | 0.69 | 0.5–1.8 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
| Incisors exhibiting a new or deteriorated WSL | Total | 64 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.2–1.5 | 1.0 | 55 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.7–1.2 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 14 | 1.4 | 0.50 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 13 | 1.2 | 1.41 | 0.3–2.0 | 1.0 | .180 | |
| Tooth 11 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.58 | −1.1–1.8 | 0.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 21 | 5 | 1.4 | 0.55 | 0.7–2.1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 22 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 14 | 0.8 | 0.77 | 0.4–1.3 | 1.0 | .039 | |
| Tooth 32 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–0.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.84 | −0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–1.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 1.00 | −0.2–2.2 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 0.4–2.0 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
| . | . | T1 . | T3 . | T1 vs. T3 . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n . | WSL-Index median score . | n . | WSL-Index median score . | |||||||||
| M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | P . | ||||
| Incisors exhibiting a WSL | Total | 81 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 1.2–1.4 | 1.0 | 71 | 0.9 | 0.87 | 0.7–1.1 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 16 | 1.1 | 1.29 | 0.4–1.8 | 1.0 | .065 | |
| Tooth 11 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.4 | 0.55 | −0.3–1.1 | 0.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 21 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.2–1.4 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 22 | 22 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.1–1.5 | 1.0 | 19 | 0.8 | 0.71 | 0.4–1.1 | 1.0 | .006 | |
| Tooth 32 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.75 | 0.0–1.6 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 8 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 9 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.1 | 0.69 | 0.5–1.8 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
| Incisors exhibiting a new or deteriorated WSL | Total | 64 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.2–1.5 | 1.0 | 55 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.7–1.2 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 14 | 1.4 | 0.50 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 13 | 1.2 | 1.41 | 0.3–2.0 | 1.0 | .180 | |
| Tooth 11 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.58 | −1.1–1.8 | 0.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 21 | 5 | 1.4 | 0.55 | 0.7–2.1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 22 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 14 | 0.8 | 0.77 | 0.4–1.3 | 1.0 | .039 | |
| Tooth 32 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–0.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.84 | −0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–1.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 1.00 | −0.2–2.2 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 0.4–2.0 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
In addition, the p-value for the comparison T1 vs. T3 is given.
WSL-Index median score in affected incisors at T1 and T3: the mean value (M), standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI) and median value are given for the different incisor types.
| . | . | T1 . | T3 . | T1 vs. T3 . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n . | WSL-Index median score . | n . | WSL-Index median score . | |||||||||
| M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | P . | ||||
| Incisors exhibiting a WSL | Total | 81 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 1.2–1.4 | 1.0 | 71 | 0.9 | 0.87 | 0.7–1.1 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 16 | 1.1 | 1.29 | 0.4–1.8 | 1.0 | .065 | |
| Tooth 11 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.4 | 0.55 | −0.3–1.1 | 0.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 21 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.2–1.4 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 22 | 22 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.1–1.5 | 1.0 | 19 | 0.8 | 0.71 | 0.4–1.1 | 1.0 | .006 | |
| Tooth 32 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.75 | 0.0–1.6 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 8 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 9 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.1 | 0.69 | 0.5–1.8 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
| Incisors exhibiting a new or deteriorated WSL | Total | 64 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.2–1.5 | 1.0 | 55 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.7–1.2 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 14 | 1.4 | 0.50 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 13 | 1.2 | 1.41 | 0.3–2.0 | 1.0 | .180 | |
| Tooth 11 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.58 | −1.1–1.8 | 0.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 21 | 5 | 1.4 | 0.55 | 0.7–2.1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 22 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 14 | 0.8 | 0.77 | 0.4–1.3 | 1.0 | .039 | |
| Tooth 32 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–0.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.84 | −0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–1.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 1.00 | −0.2–2.2 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 0.4–2.0 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
| . | . | T1 . | T3 . | T1 vs. T3 . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n . | WSL-Index median score . | n . | WSL-Index median score . | |||||||||
| M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | M . | SD . | 95% CI . | Med . | P . | ||||
| Incisors exhibiting a WSL | Total | 81 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 1.2–1.4 | 1.0 | 71 | 0.9 | 0.87 | 0.7–1.1 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 16 | 1.1 | 1.29 | 0.4–1.8 | 1.0 | .065 | |
| Tooth 11 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.4 | 0.55 | −0.3–1.1 | 0.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 21 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.2–1.4 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 22 | 22 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.1–1.5 | 1.0 | 19 | 0.8 | 0.71 | 0.4–1.1 | 1.0 | .006 | |
| Tooth 32 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.75 | 0.0–1.6 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 8 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 9 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.9–1.6 | 1.0 | 7 | 1.1 | 0.69 | 0.5–1.8 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
| Incisors exhibiting a new or deteriorated WSL | Total | 64 | 1.3 | 0.48 | 1.2–1.5 | 1.0 | 55 | 1.0 | 0.94 | 0.7–1.2 | 1.0 | .001 |
| Tooth 12 | 14 | 1.4 | 0.50 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 13 | 1.2 | 1.41 | 0.3–2.0 | 1.0 | .180 | |
| Tooth 11 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.58 | −1.1–1.8 | 0.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 21 | 5 | 1.4 | 0.55 | 0.7–2.1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 1.0–1.0 | 1.0 | .500 | |
| Tooth 22 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.49 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.0 | 14 | 0.8 | 0.77 | 0.4–1.3 | 1.0 | .039 | |
| Tooth 32 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–0.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.84 | −0.2–1.8 | 1.0 | .250 | |
| Tooth 31 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.55 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.89 | 0.1–1.9 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 41 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.52 | 0.8–1.9 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 1.00 | −0.2–2.2 | 1.0 | .625 | |
| Tooth 42 | 7 | 1.3 | 0.49 | 0.8–1.7 | 1.0 | 6 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 0.4–2.0 | 1.0 | 1.000 | |
In addition, the p-value for the comparison T1 vs. T3 is given.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
