| . | Lim, 2018 . | Trietsch, 2017 . | Vervloet, 2016 . | Clyne, 2015 . | Magrini (TEA), 2014 . | Magrini (SIDRO), 2014 . | Avery, 2012 . | Pape, 2011 . | Bregnhoj, 2009 . | Fretheim, 2006 . | Crotty, 2004 . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator used in feedback report | |||||||||||
| Score from prior period(s) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Scores from similar peers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| No comparator mentioned | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Source of data | |||||||||||
| Manual chart | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| Routinely collected data | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Computerized search | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Pharmacist role in A&F* | AUD, FRP | GPD | GPD, ED | AUD, ED | GPD, ED | GPD, ED | IPT, ED | AUD, IPT, ED | IPT | AUD, FRP, ED | AUD, FRP, ED |
| Format of feedback | |||||||||||
| Verbal | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Written | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Mode of giving feedback | |||||||||||
| In-person | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Telephone | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Post | ✓ | ||||||||||
| Feedback content | |||||||||||
| General | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Specific | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Frequency of feedback | |||||||||||
| Once | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| More than once | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Feedback recipient | |||||||||||
| Individual | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Decision support tool included | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Level of information in feedback | |||||||||||
| Team | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Clinician | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Patient | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Work situation | |||||||||||
| External to participants | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Colleague of participants | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Interprofessional group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Study-specific training | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Experience | Varied | “Senior” | 7–30 | 6 | NR | NR | 0–24 | NR | NR | 15–25 | NR |
| Number of pharmacists involved | NR | 39 | “Team” | NR | NR | NR | 72 | NR | 1 | 4 | NR |
| . | Lim, 2018 . | Trietsch, 2017 . | Vervloet, 2016 . | Clyne, 2015 . | Magrini (TEA), 2014 . | Magrini (SIDRO), 2014 . | Avery, 2012 . | Pape, 2011 . | Bregnhoj, 2009 . | Fretheim, 2006 . | Crotty, 2004 . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator used in feedback report | |||||||||||
| Score from prior period(s) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Scores from similar peers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| No comparator mentioned | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Source of data | |||||||||||
| Manual chart | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| Routinely collected data | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Computerized search | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Pharmacist role in A&F* | AUD, FRP | GPD | GPD, ED | AUD, ED | GPD, ED | GPD, ED | IPT, ED | AUD, IPT, ED | IPT | AUD, FRP, ED | AUD, FRP, ED |
| Format of feedback | |||||||||||
| Verbal | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Written | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Mode of giving feedback | |||||||||||
| In-person | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Telephone | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Post | ✓ | ||||||||||
| Feedback content | |||||||||||
| General | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Specific | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Frequency of feedback | |||||||||||
| Once | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| More than once | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Feedback recipient | |||||||||||
| Individual | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Decision support tool included | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Level of information in feedback | |||||||||||
| Team | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Clinician | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Patient | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Work situation | |||||||||||
| External to participants | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Colleague of participants | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Interprofessional group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Study-specific training | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Experience | Varied | “Senior” | 7–30 | 6 | NR | NR | 0–24 | NR | NR | 15–25 | NR |
| Number of pharmacists involved | NR | 39 | “Team” | NR | NR | NR | 72 | NR | 1 | 4 | NR |
Pharmacist role in A&F: AUD conducted audit; FRP provided feedback report; GPD facilitated group feedback discussion with GPs; IPT provided feedback on patient-by-patient basis; ED provided education. NR, not reported.
| . | Lim, 2018 . | Trietsch, 2017 . | Vervloet, 2016 . | Clyne, 2015 . | Magrini (TEA), 2014 . | Magrini (SIDRO), 2014 . | Avery, 2012 . | Pape, 2011 . | Bregnhoj, 2009 . | Fretheim, 2006 . | Crotty, 2004 . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator used in feedback report | |||||||||||
| Score from prior period(s) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Scores from similar peers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| No comparator mentioned | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Source of data | |||||||||||
| Manual chart | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| Routinely collected data | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Computerized search | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Pharmacist role in A&F* | AUD, FRP | GPD | GPD, ED | AUD, ED | GPD, ED | GPD, ED | IPT, ED | AUD, IPT, ED | IPT | AUD, FRP, ED | AUD, FRP, ED |
| Format of feedback | |||||||||||
| Verbal | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Written | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Mode of giving feedback | |||||||||||
| In-person | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Telephone | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Post | ✓ | ||||||||||
| Feedback content | |||||||||||
| General | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Specific | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Frequency of feedback | |||||||||||
| Once | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| More than once | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Feedback recipient | |||||||||||
| Individual | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Decision support tool included | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Level of information in feedback | |||||||||||
| Team | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Clinician | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Patient | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Work situation | |||||||||||
| External to participants | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Colleague of participants | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Interprofessional group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Study-specific training | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Experience | Varied | “Senior” | 7–30 | 6 | NR | NR | 0–24 | NR | NR | 15–25 | NR |
| Number of pharmacists involved | NR | 39 | “Team” | NR | NR | NR | 72 | NR | 1 | 4 | NR |
| . | Lim, 2018 . | Trietsch, 2017 . | Vervloet, 2016 . | Clyne, 2015 . | Magrini (TEA), 2014 . | Magrini (SIDRO), 2014 . | Avery, 2012 . | Pape, 2011 . | Bregnhoj, 2009 . | Fretheim, 2006 . | Crotty, 2004 . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator used in feedback report | |||||||||||
| Score from prior period(s) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Scores from similar peers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| No comparator mentioned | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Source of data | |||||||||||
| Manual chart | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||
| Routinely collected data | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Computerized search | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Pharmacist role in A&F* | AUD, FRP | GPD | GPD, ED | AUD, ED | GPD, ED | GPD, ED | IPT, ED | AUD, IPT, ED | IPT | AUD, FRP, ED | AUD, FRP, ED |
| Format of feedback | |||||||||||
| Verbal | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Written | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Mode of giving feedback | |||||||||||
| In-person | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Telephone | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Post | ✓ | ||||||||||
| Feedback content | |||||||||||
| General | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Specific | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Frequency of feedback | |||||||||||
| Once | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| More than once | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Feedback recipient | |||||||||||
| Individual | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Decision support tool included | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Level of information in feedback | |||||||||||
| Team | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Clinician | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Patient | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Work situation | |||||||||||
| External to participants | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Colleague of participants | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||
| Interprofessional group | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| Study-specific training | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Experience | Varied | “Senior” | 7–30 | 6 | NR | NR | 0–24 | NR | NR | 15–25 | NR |
| Number of pharmacists involved | NR | 39 | “Team” | NR | NR | NR | 72 | NR | 1 | 4 | NR |
Pharmacist role in A&F: AUD conducted audit; FRP provided feedback report; GPD facilitated group feedback discussion with GPs; IPT provided feedback on patient-by-patient basis; ED provided education. NR, not reported.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
