Table 6.

Carbon abundances from the CO lines.

ObjectT  efflog gModel1*Δ log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|Model2Δlog |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|§log |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|N  χ2|$^\#$|
GJ 54.13162.5.084Ca3200c50+0.042−3.358 ± 0.112Ca3160c508−0.022−3.380 ± 0.086141.511
GJ 752B2639.5.213Ca2600c525−0.131−3.531 ± 0.098Cc2640c521−0.019−3.550 ± 0.0661420.114
GJ 8733434.4.903Ca3400c50−0.003−3.397 ± 0.094Ca3430c490−0.043−3.440 ± 0.092131.474
GJ 10022974.5.133Ca3000c50+0.007−3.393 ± 0.135Ca2970c513−0.024−3.417 ± 0.0881414.710
GJ 1245B2944.5.138Ca2900c525−0.107−3.507 ± 0.116Ca2940c514+0.072−3.435 ± 0.098141.372
GAT 13702685.5.199Ca2700c525−0.301−3.701 ± 0.071Cc2690c520−0.080−3.781 ± 0.061135.716
LP 412-312607.5.217Ca2600c525+0.019−3.381 ± 0.123Ca2610c522+0.022−3.357 ± 0.068917.296
ObjectT  efflog gModel1*Δ log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|Model2Δlog |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|§log |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|N  χ2|$^\#$|
GJ 54.13162.5.084Ca3200c50+0.042−3.358 ± 0.112Ca3160c508−0.022−3.380 ± 0.086141.511
GJ 752B2639.5.213Ca2600c525−0.131−3.531 ± 0.098Cc2640c521−0.019−3.550 ± 0.0661420.114
GJ 8733434.4.903Ca3400c50−0.003−3.397 ± 0.094Ca3430c490−0.043−3.440 ± 0.092131.474
GJ 10022974.5.133Ca3000c50+0.007−3.393 ± 0.135Ca2970c513−0.024−3.417 ± 0.0881414.710
GJ 1245B2944.5.138Ca2900c525−0.107−3.507 ± 0.116Ca2940c514+0.072−3.435 ± 0.098141.372
GAT 13702685.5.199Ca2700c525−0.301−3.701 ± 0.071Cc2690c520−0.080−3.781 ± 0.061135.716
LP 412-312607.5.217Ca2600c525+0.019−3.381 ± 0.123Ca2610c522+0.022−3.357 ± 0.068917.296

*Model photosphere from the UCM grid.

First correction to the assumed values for the model of the Ca series; log |$A_{\rm C}^{(0)} = -3.40$| and log |$A_{\rm O}^{(0)} = -3.08$|⁠.

Specified model for Teff and log g in the second and third columns, respectively.

§Second correction to the starting values log AC = log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$| in the sixth column of table 6 and log AO = log |$A_{\rm O}^{(1)}$| in the fourth column of table 8.

Number of CO blends used for the mini CG analysis.

|$^\#$|χ2 value for the comparison of the observed and predicted spectra in figure 10.

Table 6.

Carbon abundances from the CO lines.

ObjectT  efflog gModel1*Δ log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|Model2Δlog |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|§log |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|N  χ2|$^\#$|
GJ 54.13162.5.084Ca3200c50+0.042−3.358 ± 0.112Ca3160c508−0.022−3.380 ± 0.086141.511
GJ 752B2639.5.213Ca2600c525−0.131−3.531 ± 0.098Cc2640c521−0.019−3.550 ± 0.0661420.114
GJ 8733434.4.903Ca3400c50−0.003−3.397 ± 0.094Ca3430c490−0.043−3.440 ± 0.092131.474
GJ 10022974.5.133Ca3000c50+0.007−3.393 ± 0.135Ca2970c513−0.024−3.417 ± 0.0881414.710
GJ 1245B2944.5.138Ca2900c525−0.107−3.507 ± 0.116Ca2940c514+0.072−3.435 ± 0.098141.372
GAT 13702685.5.199Ca2700c525−0.301−3.701 ± 0.071Cc2690c520−0.080−3.781 ± 0.061135.716
LP 412-312607.5.217Ca2600c525+0.019−3.381 ± 0.123Ca2610c522+0.022−3.357 ± 0.068917.296
ObjectT  efflog gModel1*Δ log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$|Model2Δlog |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|§log |$A_{\rm C}^{(2)}$|N  χ2|$^\#$|
GJ 54.13162.5.084Ca3200c50+0.042−3.358 ± 0.112Ca3160c508−0.022−3.380 ± 0.086141.511
GJ 752B2639.5.213Ca2600c525−0.131−3.531 ± 0.098Cc2640c521−0.019−3.550 ± 0.0661420.114
GJ 8733434.4.903Ca3400c50−0.003−3.397 ± 0.094Ca3430c490−0.043−3.440 ± 0.092131.474
GJ 10022974.5.133Ca3000c50+0.007−3.393 ± 0.135Ca2970c513−0.024−3.417 ± 0.0881414.710
GJ 1245B2944.5.138Ca2900c525−0.107−3.507 ± 0.116Ca2940c514+0.072−3.435 ± 0.098141.372
GAT 13702685.5.199Ca2700c525−0.301−3.701 ± 0.071Cc2690c520−0.080−3.781 ± 0.061135.716
LP 412-312607.5.217Ca2600c525+0.019−3.381 ± 0.123Ca2610c522+0.022−3.357 ± 0.068917.296

*Model photosphere from the UCM grid.

First correction to the assumed values for the model of the Ca series; log |$A_{\rm C}^{(0)} = -3.40$| and log |$A_{\rm O}^{(0)} = -3.08$|⁠.

Specified model for Teff and log g in the second and third columns, respectively.

§Second correction to the starting values log AC = log |$A_{\rm C}^{(1)}$| in the sixth column of table 6 and log AO = log |$A_{\rm O}^{(1)}$| in the fourth column of table 8.

Number of CO blends used for the mini CG analysis.

|$^\#$|χ2 value for the comparison of the observed and predicted spectra in figure 10.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close