Object . | WCO [K km s−1]† . | LHα . | R . | Mparent‡ . | |$M_{\rm H}$|ii . | Mcluster . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| [1022 cm−2]† . | [1038 erg s−1] . | [pc] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . |
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . |
SSC B1 | 3.6 | 11 | 19 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | ∼1.9 | 6.8 |
303 | ||||||
Emerging cluster | 2.2 | 2.4 | 19 | 3.8|$^{+3.8}_{-2.5}$| | ∼0.4 | — |
187 | ||||||
Protocluster candidate | 15 | — | 18 | 2.0|$^{+2.0}_{-1.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 4 | 1266 | |||||
Protocluster candidate | 19 | — | 21 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 5 | 1548 |
Object . | WCO [K km s−1]† . | LHα . | R . | Mparent‡ . | |$M_{\rm H}$|ii . | Mcluster . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| [1022 cm−2]† . | [1038 erg s−1] . | [pc] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . |
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . |
SSC B1 | 3.6 | 11 | 19 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | ∼1.9 | 6.8 |
303 | ||||||
Emerging cluster | 2.2 | 2.4 | 19 | 3.8|$^{+3.8}_{-2.5}$| | ∼0.4 | — |
187 | ||||||
Protocluster candidate | 15 | — | 18 | 2.0|$^{+2.0}_{-1.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 4 | 1266 | |||||
Protocluster candidate | 19 | — | 21 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 5 | 1548 |
Column (1): Object name. Column (2): Column density and integrated intensity of molecular cloud. Column (3): Luminosity of Hα emission obtained with HST (Whitmore et al. 2010). Column (4): The radius of the object. The radius of the protocluster is defined as the size where the integrated intensity decreases to 50% of the peak integrated intensity. Radii of parent clouds of SSC B1 and the emerging cluster are assumed to be geometric means of radii of the two protoclusters. Column (5): Mparent is molecular mass inside of the radius projected to have been within the radius based on extrapolation from ALMA4 and ALMA5. The CO cloud masses of SSC B1 and the emerging cluster are given by [(the average |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| of ALMA4 and ALMA5) − (the present |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| toward SSC B1|$/$|emerging cluster)] × πR2. Column (6): Ionized gas mass derived by using the relationship between Hα luminosity and ionized gas mass |$M_{\rm gas \ ionized} = 0.98\times 10^{9} (\frac{L_{\rm H\alpha }}{10^{43}\:\mbox{erg}\:\mbox{s}^{-1}}) {(\frac{n_{\rm e}}{100\:\mbox{cm}^{-3}})}^{-1}$| (Osterbrock & Ferland 2006). LHα is the luminosity of Hα [erg s−1] and ne is assumed to be 100 cm−3. Column (7): Total stellar mass of the cluster (Whitmore et al. 2010).
Minimum value for SSC B1 and the emerging cluster, and maximum value for the protocluster candidates.
Errors of Mparent are derived from three times uncertainty of XCO factor.
Object . | WCO [K km s−1]† . | LHα . | R . | Mparent‡ . | |$M_{\rm H}$|ii . | Mcluster . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| [1022 cm−2]† . | [1038 erg s−1] . | [pc] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . |
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . |
SSC B1 | 3.6 | 11 | 19 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | ∼1.9 | 6.8 |
303 | ||||||
Emerging cluster | 2.2 | 2.4 | 19 | 3.8|$^{+3.8}_{-2.5}$| | ∼0.4 | — |
187 | ||||||
Protocluster candidate | 15 | — | 18 | 2.0|$^{+2.0}_{-1.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 4 | 1266 | |||||
Protocluster candidate | 19 | — | 21 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 5 | 1548 |
Object . | WCO [K km s−1]† . | LHα . | R . | Mparent‡ . | |$M_{\rm H}$|ii . | Mcluster . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| [1022 cm−2]† . | [1038 erg s−1] . | [pc] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . | [106 M⊙] . |
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . | (4) . | (5) . | (6) . | (7) . |
SSC B1 | 3.6 | 11 | 19 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | ∼1.9 | 6.8 |
303 | ||||||
Emerging cluster | 2.2 | 2.4 | 19 | 3.8|$^{+3.8}_{-2.5}$| | ∼0.4 | — |
187 | ||||||
Protocluster candidate | 15 | — | 18 | 2.0|$^{+2.0}_{-1.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 4 | 1266 | |||||
Protocluster candidate | 19 | — | 21 | 3.4|$^{+3.4}_{-2.3}$| | — | — |
ALMA 5 | 1548 |
Column (1): Object name. Column (2): Column density and integrated intensity of molecular cloud. Column (3): Luminosity of Hα emission obtained with HST (Whitmore et al. 2010). Column (4): The radius of the object. The radius of the protocluster is defined as the size where the integrated intensity decreases to 50% of the peak integrated intensity. Radii of parent clouds of SSC B1 and the emerging cluster are assumed to be geometric means of radii of the two protoclusters. Column (5): Mparent is molecular mass inside of the radius projected to have been within the radius based on extrapolation from ALMA4 and ALMA5. The CO cloud masses of SSC B1 and the emerging cluster are given by [(the average |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| of ALMA4 and ALMA5) − (the present |$N_{\rm H_{2}}$| toward SSC B1|$/$|emerging cluster)] × πR2. Column (6): Ionized gas mass derived by using the relationship between Hα luminosity and ionized gas mass |$M_{\rm gas \ ionized} = 0.98\times 10^{9} (\frac{L_{\rm H\alpha }}{10^{43}\:\mbox{erg}\:\mbox{s}^{-1}}) {(\frac{n_{\rm e}}{100\:\mbox{cm}^{-3}})}^{-1}$| (Osterbrock & Ferland 2006). LHα is the luminosity of Hα [erg s−1] and ne is assumed to be 100 cm−3. Column (7): Total stellar mass of the cluster (Whitmore et al. 2010).
Minimum value for SSC B1 and the emerging cluster, and maximum value for the protocluster candidates.
Errors of Mparent are derived from three times uncertainty of XCO factor.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.