Table 4. Open in new tab Pairwise...

Objection	logit(se)
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment	−2.93(0.40)^c	−0.34(0.21)^abc
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal	−3.29(0.48)^c	0.10(0.21)^a
Imploring-Logical Appeal	−2.63(0.36)^bc	−0.01(0.21)^ab
Threatening-Reputational Attack	−1.55(0.23)^b	−0.90(0.23)^bc
Threatening-Violent Warning	−0.36(0.18)^a	−3.40(0.53)^d
Preserving-Personal Abstinence	−15.86*^abc	−1.05(0.24)^c
Preserving-Group Maintenance	−2.63(0.40)^bc	−0.49(0.21)^abc

Objection	logit(se)
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment	−2.93(0.40)^c	−0.34(0.21)^abc
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal	−3.29(0.48)^c	0.10(0.21)^a
Imploring-Logical Appeal	−2.63(0.36)^bc	−0.01(0.21)^ab
Threatening-Reputational Attack	−1.55(0.23)^b	−0.90(0.23)^bc
Threatening-Violent Warning	−0.36(0.18)^a	−3.40(0.53)^d
Preserving-Personal Abstinence	−15.86*^abc	−1.05(0.24)^c
Preserving-Group Maintenance	−2.63(0.40)^bc	−0.49(0.21)^abc

Table 4.

Pairwise comparisons of objections on intentions to downvote and upvote objections

Objection	logit(se)
Objection	Intention to downvote	Intention to upvote
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment	−2.93(0.40)^c	−0.34(0.21)^abc
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal	−3.29(0.48)^c	0.10(0.21)^a
Imploring-Logical Appeal	−2.63(0.36)^bc	−0.01(0.21)^ab
Threatening-Reputational Attack	−1.55(0.23)^b	−0.90(0.23)^bc
Threatening-Violent Warning	−0.36(0.18)^a	−3.40(0.53)^d
Preserving-Personal Abstinence	−15.86*^abc	−1.05(0.24)^c
Preserving-Group Maintenance	−2.63(0.40)^bc	−0.49(0.21)^abc

Objection	logit(se)
Objection	Intention to downvote	Intention to upvote
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment	−2.93(0.40)^c	−0.34(0.21)^abc
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal	−3.29(0.48)^c	0.10(0.21)^a
Imploring-Logical Appeal	−2.63(0.36)^bc	−0.01(0.21)^ab
Threatening-Reputational Attack	−1.55(0.23)^b	−0.90(0.23)^bc
Threatening-Violent Warning	−0.36(0.18)^a	−3.40(0.53)^d
Preserving-Personal Abstinence	−15.86*^abc	−1.05(0.24)^c
Preserving-Group Maintenance	−2.63(0.40)^bc	−0.49(0.21)^abc

Note: Within columns, objection types that share the same letter are not different from each other at a p-value level of .05. For Preserving-Personal Abstinence*, only two persons chose to downvote, while the vast majority did not, leading to a high standard error. This makes comparisons with other groups statistically challenging.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only