Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons of objections on severity, moral judgment, attitudes, and perceived effectiveness toward the objection

ObjectionM(SD)
SeverityMoral judgmentAttitudeEffectiveness
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment2.30(1.25)c5.47(1.76)bc4.79(1.84)bc3.77(1.80)b
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal2.38(1.21)bc5.93(1.24)c5.25(1.71)c4.85(1.49)c
Imploring-Logical Appeal2.46(1.24)bc5.80(1.31)bc5.32(1.74)c4.86(1.74)c
Threatening-Reputational Attack3.28(1.44)b4.76(1.80)b4.03(2.02)b3.52(1.75)b
Threatening-Violent Warning4.91(1.31)a2.38(1.43)a1.97(1.34)a2.11(1.40)a
Preserving-Personal Abstinence2.48(1.27)bc5.18(1.59)bc4.33(1.64)bc3.55(1.73)b
Preserving-Group Maintenance2.58(1.44)bc5.18(1.81)bc4.70(1.94)bc3.73(1.93)b
ObjectionM(SD)
SeverityMoral judgmentAttitudeEffectiveness
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment2.30(1.25)c5.47(1.76)bc4.79(1.84)bc3.77(1.80)b
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal2.38(1.21)bc5.93(1.24)c5.25(1.71)c4.85(1.49)c
Imploring-Logical Appeal2.46(1.24)bc5.80(1.31)bc5.32(1.74)c4.86(1.74)c
Threatening-Reputational Attack3.28(1.44)b4.76(1.80)b4.03(2.02)b3.52(1.75)b
Threatening-Violent Warning4.91(1.31)a2.38(1.43)a1.97(1.34)a2.11(1.40)a
Preserving-Personal Abstinence2.48(1.27)bc5.18(1.59)bc4.33(1.64)bc3.55(1.73)b
Preserving-Group Maintenance2.58(1.44)bc5.18(1.81)bc4.70(1.94)bc3.73(1.93)b

Note: Within columns, objection types that share the same letter are not different from each other at a p-value level of .05.

Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons of objections on severity, moral judgment, attitudes, and perceived effectiveness toward the objection

ObjectionM(SD)
SeverityMoral judgmentAttitudeEffectiveness
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment2.30(1.25)c5.47(1.76)bc4.79(1.84)bc3.77(1.80)b
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal2.38(1.21)bc5.93(1.24)c5.25(1.71)c4.85(1.49)c
Imploring-Logical Appeal2.46(1.24)bc5.80(1.31)bc5.32(1.74)c4.86(1.74)c
Threatening-Reputational Attack3.28(1.44)b4.76(1.80)b4.03(2.02)b3.52(1.75)b
Threatening-Violent Warning4.91(1.31)a2.38(1.43)a1.97(1.34)a2.11(1.40)a
Preserving-Personal Abstinence2.48(1.27)bc5.18(1.59)bc4.33(1.64)bc3.55(1.73)b
Preserving-Group Maintenance2.58(1.44)bc5.18(1.81)bc4.70(1.94)bc3.73(1.93)b
ObjectionM(SD)
SeverityMoral judgmentAttitudeEffectiveness
Dismissal-Objectionable Comment2.30(1.25)c5.47(1.76)bc4.79(1.84)bc3.77(1.80)b
Imploring-Conscientious Appeal2.38(1.21)bc5.93(1.24)c5.25(1.71)c4.85(1.49)c
Imploring-Logical Appeal2.46(1.24)bc5.80(1.31)bc5.32(1.74)c4.86(1.74)c
Threatening-Reputational Attack3.28(1.44)b4.76(1.80)b4.03(2.02)b3.52(1.75)b
Threatening-Violent Warning4.91(1.31)a2.38(1.43)a1.97(1.34)a2.11(1.40)a
Preserving-Personal Abstinence2.48(1.27)bc5.18(1.59)bc4.33(1.64)bc3.55(1.73)b
Preserving-Group Maintenance2.58(1.44)bc5.18(1.81)bc4.70(1.94)bc3.73(1.93)b

Note: Within columns, objection types that share the same letter are not different from each other at a p-value level of .05.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close