Table 3.

Summary of nebula regions in the Field of HE 0238−1904.

ID|$\log (n_{\rm e, [O\,{\small II}]} /\mathrm{cm}^{-3})^{\rm a}$|log (nH, Cloudy/cm−3)blog(UCloudy)c
S1<1.6|$1.6^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.2^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S2<1.7|$1.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.1^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S3
S4
S5<1.6|$4.2^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.0^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S6|$1.8^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$2.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.5^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S7<1.9|$3.0^{+0.3}_{-0.3}$||$-3.2^{-0.3}_{+0.3}$|
S8<1.3|$3.5^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
S9<2.3|$4.1^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.5^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S10<1.4|$3.6^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.2}_{+0.2}$|
B1<2.8|$2.1^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.7^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B2<1.2|$2.9^{+0.1}_{-0.3}$||$-3.4^{-0.1}_{+0.3}$|
B3<2.5|$1.9^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.8^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B4
ID|$\log (n_{\rm e, [O\,{\small II}]} /\mathrm{cm}^{-3})^{\rm a}$|log (nH, Cloudy/cm−3)blog(UCloudy)c
S1<1.6|$1.6^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.2^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S2<1.7|$1.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.1^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S3
S4
S5<1.6|$4.2^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.0^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S6|$1.8^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$2.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.5^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S7<1.9|$3.0^{+0.3}_{-0.3}$||$-3.2^{-0.3}_{+0.3}$|
S8<1.3|$3.5^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
S9<2.3|$4.1^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.5^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S10<1.4|$3.6^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.2}_{+0.2}$|
B1<2.8|$2.1^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.7^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B2<1.2|$2.9^{+0.1}_{-0.3}$||$-3.4^{-0.1}_{+0.3}$|
B3<2.5|$1.9^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.8^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B4

aNumber density measurement or 95 per cent upper limit measured from |$\rm [O\,{\small II}]\lambda 3729/[O\,{\small II}]\lambda 3727$|⁠.

bNumber density inferred from Cloudy simulation described in the text.

cBest-fitting ionization parameter computed by Cloudy simulation.

Table 3.

Summary of nebula regions in the Field of HE 0238−1904.

ID|$\log (n_{\rm e, [O\,{\small II}]} /\mathrm{cm}^{-3})^{\rm a}$|log (nH, Cloudy/cm−3)blog(UCloudy)c
S1<1.6|$1.6^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.2^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S2<1.7|$1.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.1^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S3
S4
S5<1.6|$4.2^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.0^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S6|$1.8^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$2.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.5^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S7<1.9|$3.0^{+0.3}_{-0.3}$||$-3.2^{-0.3}_{+0.3}$|
S8<1.3|$3.5^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
S9<2.3|$4.1^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.5^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S10<1.4|$3.6^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.2}_{+0.2}$|
B1<2.8|$2.1^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.7^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B2<1.2|$2.9^{+0.1}_{-0.3}$||$-3.4^{-0.1}_{+0.3}$|
B3<2.5|$1.9^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.8^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B4
ID|$\log (n_{\rm e, [O\,{\small II}]} /\mathrm{cm}^{-3})^{\rm a}$|log (nH, Cloudy/cm−3)blog(UCloudy)c
S1<1.6|$1.6^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.2^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S2<1.7|$1.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.1^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S3
S4
S5<1.6|$4.2^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.0^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S6|$1.8^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$2.7^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$||$-2.5^{-0.1}_{+0.1}$|
S7<1.9|$3.0^{+0.3}_{-0.3}$||$-3.2^{-0.3}_{+0.3}$|
S8<1.3|$3.5^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
S9<2.3|$4.1^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$||$-3.5^{-0.2}_{+0.3}$|
S10<1.4|$3.6^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$||$-3.3^{-0.2}_{+0.2}$|
B1<2.8|$2.1^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.7^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B2<1.2|$2.9^{+0.1}_{-0.3}$||$-3.4^{-0.1}_{+0.3}$|
B3<2.5|$1.9^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$||$-2.8^{-0.1}_{+0.2}$|
B4

aNumber density measurement or 95 per cent upper limit measured from |$\rm [O\,{\small II}]\lambda 3729/[O\,{\small II}]\lambda 3727$|⁠.

bNumber density inferred from Cloudy simulation described in the text.

cBest-fitting ionization parameter computed by Cloudy simulation.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close