Table 2.

Country-level resultsa for items related to legal–ethical context, ordered by the percentage of respondents reporting withdrawal occurrence

CountryRegionNumber of respondentsOccurrence of withdrawalStopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedbNational law or regulation of right for palliative care
Explicit lawOfficial regulationNo regulation, but permissive attitudeNo regulation, no permissive attitude
BelgiumWest197995535420
UKNorth4672801711657
FranceWest346565593299
The NetherlandsWest14641002914570
AustriaWest1362693915398
SwedenNorth1560934013407
SwitzerlandWest13541003115540
SpainSouth48507338213110
GermanyWest3749572422495
Czech RepublicEast12333317174225
PortugalSouth1429714321297
RomaniaEast1828331105633
EgyptSouth152720005347
RussiaEast112718918964
GreeceSouth262381203950
PolandEast1718532405918
ItalySouth771340735338
CroatiaSouth11027005545
CountryRegionNumber of respondentsOccurrence of withdrawalStopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedbNational law or regulation of right for palliative care
Explicit lawOfficial regulationNo regulation, but permissive attitudeNo regulation, no permissive attitude
BelgiumWest197995535420
UKNorth4672801711657
FranceWest346565593299
The NetherlandsWest14641002914570
AustriaWest1362693915398
SwedenNorth1560934013407
SwitzerlandWest13541003115540
SpainSouth48507338213110
GermanyWest3749572422495
Czech RepublicEast12333317174225
PortugalSouth1429714321297
RomaniaEast1828331105633
EgyptSouth152720005347
RussiaEast112718918964
GreeceSouth262381203950
PolandEast1718532405918
ItalySouth771340735338
CroatiaSouth11027005545

Values are numbers (%).

aResults displayed for countries with at least 10 respondents.

bRefers to respondents' perception that life-prolonging treatment in terminally ill patients is formally or informally allowed in their country.

Table 2.

Country-level resultsa for items related to legal–ethical context, ordered by the percentage of respondents reporting withdrawal occurrence

CountryRegionNumber of respondentsOccurrence of withdrawalStopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedbNational law or regulation of right for palliative care
Explicit lawOfficial regulationNo regulation, but permissive attitudeNo regulation, no permissive attitude
BelgiumWest197995535420
UKNorth4672801711657
FranceWest346565593299
The NetherlandsWest14641002914570
AustriaWest1362693915398
SwedenNorth1560934013407
SwitzerlandWest13541003115540
SpainSouth48507338213110
GermanyWest3749572422495
Czech RepublicEast12333317174225
PortugalSouth1429714321297
RomaniaEast1828331105633
EgyptSouth152720005347
RussiaEast112718918964
GreeceSouth262381203950
PolandEast1718532405918
ItalySouth771340735338
CroatiaSouth11027005545
CountryRegionNumber of respondentsOccurrence of withdrawalStopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedbNational law or regulation of right for palliative care
Explicit lawOfficial regulationNo regulation, but permissive attitudeNo regulation, no permissive attitude
BelgiumWest197995535420
UKNorth4672801711657
FranceWest346565593299
The NetherlandsWest14641002914570
AustriaWest1362693915398
SwedenNorth1560934013407
SwitzerlandWest13541003115540
SpainSouth48507338213110
GermanyWest3749572422495
Czech RepublicEast12333317174225
PortugalSouth1429714321297
RomaniaEast1828331105633
EgyptSouth152720005347
RussiaEast112718918964
GreeceSouth262381203950
PolandEast1718532405918
ItalySouth771340735338
CroatiaSouth11027005545

Values are numbers (%).

aResults displayed for countries with at least 10 respondents.

bRefers to respondents' perception that life-prolonging treatment in terminally ill patients is formally or informally allowed in their country.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close