Table 1.

Respondents' characteristics and perceptions, presented separately for those reporting occurrence of withdrawal versus reporting no withdrawals, taking into account eventual clustering of answers on country levela

Occurrence of withdrawals (n = 220)No withdrawals (n = 308)
Characteristics
 Male gender149 (68)187 (61)
 Years of clinical experience
  <521 (10)26 (8)
  5–1029 (13)45 (15)
  10–2076 (35)86 (28)
  >2094(43)151 (49)
 Number of HD patients under respondent's direct care
  <2554 (25)74 (24)
  25–5042 (19)56 (18)
  >50124 (56)178 (58)
 Working in a public centre181 (82)218 (71)
Perceptions
 Laws and regulations
  Stopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedb159 (72)136 (44)
  Regulation of the right for palliative care
   Explicit law71 (32)52 (17)
   No explicit law, but official regulation26 (12)23 (8)
   No official regulation, but permissive attitude91 (41)154 (50)
   None of the above32 (15)79 (26)
 Withdrawal decision-making process
  Presence of local protocol on withdrawal decision making23 (10)14 (5)
  Geriatrician consulted in ≥25% of withdrawal decisions31 (15)20 (6)
  Who makes the decision
   Doctor alone36 (16)44 (14)
   Patient/family alone15 (7)86 (28)
   Shared decision between doctor and patient/family169 (77)170 (55)
  Would withdraw even if patient's decision is not supported by family102 (46)124 (40)
 Organization of palliative care after withdrawal
  Presence of local protocol on organization of palliative care34 (15)21 (7)
  Palliative care organizations
   Government or private for-profit organizations99 (45)128 (42)
   Private not-for-profit organizations and volunteers86 (39)108 (35)
   Not organized or do not know35 (16)72 (23)
  Palliative care is fully or partly reimbursed153 (70)152 (49)
 Palliative care training and education
  Presence of dedicated specialist training on palliative care129 (59)123 (40)
  Palliative care as explicit topic within nephrology curriculum43 (20)24 (8)
  Attending CME sessions on palliative care in last 3 years79 (36)62 (20)
Occurrence of withdrawals (n = 220)No withdrawals (n = 308)
Characteristics
 Male gender149 (68)187 (61)
 Years of clinical experience
  <521 (10)26 (8)
  5–1029 (13)45 (15)
  10–2076 (35)86 (28)
  >2094(43)151 (49)
 Number of HD patients under respondent's direct care
  <2554 (25)74 (24)
  25–5042 (19)56 (18)
  >50124 (56)178 (58)
 Working in a public centre181 (82)218 (71)
Perceptions
 Laws and regulations
  Stopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedb159 (72)136 (44)
  Regulation of the right for palliative care
   Explicit law71 (32)52 (17)
   No explicit law, but official regulation26 (12)23 (8)
   No official regulation, but permissive attitude91 (41)154 (50)
   None of the above32 (15)79 (26)
 Withdrawal decision-making process
  Presence of local protocol on withdrawal decision making23 (10)14 (5)
  Geriatrician consulted in ≥25% of withdrawal decisions31 (15)20 (6)
  Who makes the decision
   Doctor alone36 (16)44 (14)
   Patient/family alone15 (7)86 (28)
   Shared decision between doctor and patient/family169 (77)170 (55)
  Would withdraw even if patient's decision is not supported by family102 (46)124 (40)
 Organization of palliative care after withdrawal
  Presence of local protocol on organization of palliative care34 (15)21 (7)
  Palliative care organizations
   Government or private for-profit organizations99 (45)128 (42)
   Private not-for-profit organizations and volunteers86 (39)108 (35)
   Not organized or do not know35 (16)72 (23)
  Palliative care is fully or partly reimbursed153 (70)152 (49)
 Palliative care training and education
  Presence of dedicated specialist training on palliative care129 (59)123 (40)
  Palliative care as explicit topic within nephrology curriculum43 (20)24 (8)
  Attending CME sessions on palliative care in last 3 years79 (36)62 (20)

Values are numbers (%). CME, continuous medical education; HD, haemodialysis.

aThose who estimated the percentage of withdrawals in haemodialysis patients under their direct care to be <1% in the last 12 months were classified as ‘reporting no withdrawals’, and all others as ‘reporting occurrence of withdrawals’.

bRefers to perception that stopping life-prolonging treatment in terminally ill patients is formally or informally allowed.

Table 1.

Respondents' characteristics and perceptions, presented separately for those reporting occurrence of withdrawal versus reporting no withdrawals, taking into account eventual clustering of answers on country levela

Occurrence of withdrawals (n = 220)No withdrawals (n = 308)
Characteristics
 Male gender149 (68)187 (61)
 Years of clinical experience
  <521 (10)26 (8)
  5–1029 (13)45 (15)
  10–2076 (35)86 (28)
  >2094(43)151 (49)
 Number of HD patients under respondent's direct care
  <2554 (25)74 (24)
  25–5042 (19)56 (18)
  >50124 (56)178 (58)
 Working in a public centre181 (82)218 (71)
Perceptions
 Laws and regulations
  Stopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedb159 (72)136 (44)
  Regulation of the right for palliative care
   Explicit law71 (32)52 (17)
   No explicit law, but official regulation26 (12)23 (8)
   No official regulation, but permissive attitude91 (41)154 (50)
   None of the above32 (15)79 (26)
 Withdrawal decision-making process
  Presence of local protocol on withdrawal decision making23 (10)14 (5)
  Geriatrician consulted in ≥25% of withdrawal decisions31 (15)20 (6)
  Who makes the decision
   Doctor alone36 (16)44 (14)
   Patient/family alone15 (7)86 (28)
   Shared decision between doctor and patient/family169 (77)170 (55)
  Would withdraw even if patient's decision is not supported by family102 (46)124 (40)
 Organization of palliative care after withdrawal
  Presence of local protocol on organization of palliative care34 (15)21 (7)
  Palliative care organizations
   Government or private for-profit organizations99 (45)128 (42)
   Private not-for-profit organizations and volunteers86 (39)108 (35)
   Not organized or do not know35 (16)72 (23)
  Palliative care is fully or partly reimbursed153 (70)152 (49)
 Palliative care training and education
  Presence of dedicated specialist training on palliative care129 (59)123 (40)
  Palliative care as explicit topic within nephrology curriculum43 (20)24 (8)
  Attending CME sessions on palliative care in last 3 years79 (36)62 (20)
Occurrence of withdrawals (n = 220)No withdrawals (n = 308)
Characteristics
 Male gender149 (68)187 (61)
 Years of clinical experience
  <521 (10)26 (8)
  5–1029 (13)45 (15)
  10–2076 (35)86 (28)
  >2094(43)151 (49)
 Number of HD patients under respondent's direct care
  <2554 (25)74 (24)
  25–5042 (19)56 (18)
  >50124 (56)178 (58)
 Working in a public centre181 (82)218 (71)
Perceptions
 Laws and regulations
  Stopping life-prolonging treatment is allowedb159 (72)136 (44)
  Regulation of the right for palliative care
   Explicit law71 (32)52 (17)
   No explicit law, but official regulation26 (12)23 (8)
   No official regulation, but permissive attitude91 (41)154 (50)
   None of the above32 (15)79 (26)
 Withdrawal decision-making process
  Presence of local protocol on withdrawal decision making23 (10)14 (5)
  Geriatrician consulted in ≥25% of withdrawal decisions31 (15)20 (6)
  Who makes the decision
   Doctor alone36 (16)44 (14)
   Patient/family alone15 (7)86 (28)
   Shared decision between doctor and patient/family169 (77)170 (55)
  Would withdraw even if patient's decision is not supported by family102 (46)124 (40)
 Organization of palliative care after withdrawal
  Presence of local protocol on organization of palliative care34 (15)21 (7)
  Palliative care organizations
   Government or private for-profit organizations99 (45)128 (42)
   Private not-for-profit organizations and volunteers86 (39)108 (35)
   Not organized or do not know35 (16)72 (23)
  Palliative care is fully or partly reimbursed153 (70)152 (49)
 Palliative care training and education
  Presence of dedicated specialist training on palliative care129 (59)123 (40)
  Palliative care as explicit topic within nephrology curriculum43 (20)24 (8)
  Attending CME sessions on palliative care in last 3 years79 (36)62 (20)

Values are numbers (%). CME, continuous medical education; HD, haemodialysis.

aThose who estimated the percentage of withdrawals in haemodialysis patients under their direct care to be <1% in the last 12 months were classified as ‘reporting no withdrawals’, and all others as ‘reporting occurrence of withdrawals’.

bRefers to perception that stopping life-prolonging treatment in terminally ill patients is formally or informally allowed.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close