Table 3.
Open in new tab

Model comparisons for the rTPJ and the rLPFC experiment. In addition to the GLMM reported in the main text, we fitted also GLMMs step-wise leaving out higher order interaction effects. We report determination coefficients R2 (as measure of explained variance) separately for the rTPJ and rLPFC experiment

GLMFixed effectsrTPJrLPFC
GLM-1Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7540.771
GLM-2Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype0.7620.781
GLM-3Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7630.774
GLM-4Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7570.774
GLM-5Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Inequityabsolute × Efficiency0.7670.782
GLM-6Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7650.784
GLM-7Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype0.7720.781
GLM-8Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequityabsolute0.7750.788
GLM-9Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7760.790
GLMFixed effectsrTPJrLPFC
GLM-1Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7540.771
GLM-2Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype0.7620.781
GLM-3Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7630.774
GLM-4Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7570.774
GLM-5Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Inequityabsolute × Efficiency0.7670.782
GLM-6Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7650.784
GLM-7Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype0.7720.781
GLM-8Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequityabsolute0.7750.788
GLM-9Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7760.790
Table 3.
Open in new tab

Model comparisons for the rTPJ and the rLPFC experiment. In addition to the GLMM reported in the main text, we fitted also GLMMs step-wise leaving out higher order interaction effects. We report determination coefficients R2 (as measure of explained variance) separately for the rTPJ and rLPFC experiment

GLMFixed effectsrTPJrLPFC
GLM-1Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7540.771
GLM-2Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype0.7620.781
GLM-3Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7630.774
GLM-4Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7570.774
GLM-5Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Inequityabsolute × Efficiency0.7670.782
GLM-6Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7650.784
GLM-7Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype0.7720.781
GLM-8Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequityabsolute0.7750.788
GLM-9Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7760.790
GLMFixed effectsrTPJrLPFC
GLM-1Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7540.771
GLM-2Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype0.7620.781
GLM-3Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency0.7630.774
GLM-4Inequityabsolute + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7570.774
GLM-5Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Inequityabsolute × Efficiency0.7670.782
GLM-6Inequityabsolute × Efficiency + Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7650.784
GLM-7Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype0.7720.781
GLM-8Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequitytype + Efficiency × Inequityabsolute0.7750.788
GLM-9Inequityabsolute × Inequitytype × Efficiency0.7760.790
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close