The ranking results of BMSSA and SOTA algorithms on CEC 2014. “AVR” indicates the average ranking concerning mean values and “+/−/=” indicates the number of functions for which BMSSA are significantly better, worse, and similar to the competitor. The values in bold indicate the best results for the corresponding comparison groups.
Method . | Dim = 30 . | Dim = 50 . | Dim = 100 . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . |
BMSSA | ∼ | 2.1333 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7667 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7333 | 1 |
ALCPSO | 22/1/7 | 5.4667 | 6 | 27/0/3 | 5.3667 | 6 | 26/1/3 | 5.6000 | 6 |
EPSDE | 15/13/2 | 2.6667 | 2 | 18/7/5 | 3.1667 | 2 | 18/5/7 | 3.7333 | 3 |
CGPSO | 27/0/3 | 5.8000 | 7 | 29/1/0 | 5.6333 | 7 | 30/0/0 | 5.7333 | 7 |
ACWOA | 29/0/1 | 7.1333 | 8 | 27/0/3 | 7.0667 | 8 | 26/0/4 | 6.7000 | 8 |
EOBLSSA | 24/0/6 | 4.8000 | 5 | 23/1/6 | 4.4667 | 4 | 22/3/5 | 3.7667 | 4 |
DECLS | 24/4/2 | 4.4333 | 4 | 27/3/0 | 4.7667 | 5 | 27/0/3 | 5.0667 | 5 |
GOTLBO | 16/7/7 | 3.4333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.6333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.3667 | 2 |
Method . | Dim = 30 . | Dim = 50 . | Dim = 100 . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . |
BMSSA | ∼ | 2.1333 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7667 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7333 | 1 |
ALCPSO | 22/1/7 | 5.4667 | 6 | 27/0/3 | 5.3667 | 6 | 26/1/3 | 5.6000 | 6 |
EPSDE | 15/13/2 | 2.6667 | 2 | 18/7/5 | 3.1667 | 2 | 18/5/7 | 3.7333 | 3 |
CGPSO | 27/0/3 | 5.8000 | 7 | 29/1/0 | 5.6333 | 7 | 30/0/0 | 5.7333 | 7 |
ACWOA | 29/0/1 | 7.1333 | 8 | 27/0/3 | 7.0667 | 8 | 26/0/4 | 6.7000 | 8 |
EOBLSSA | 24/0/6 | 4.8000 | 5 | 23/1/6 | 4.4667 | 4 | 22/3/5 | 3.7667 | 4 |
DECLS | 24/4/2 | 4.4333 | 4 | 27/3/0 | 4.7667 | 5 | 27/0/3 | 5.0667 | 5 |
GOTLBO | 16/7/7 | 3.4333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.6333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.3667 | 2 |
The ranking results of BMSSA and SOTA algorithms on CEC 2014. “AVR” indicates the average ranking concerning mean values and “+/−/=” indicates the number of functions for which BMSSA are significantly better, worse, and similar to the competitor. The values in bold indicate the best results for the corresponding comparison groups.
Method . | Dim = 30 . | Dim = 50 . | Dim = 100 . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . |
BMSSA | ∼ | 2.1333 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7667 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7333 | 1 |
ALCPSO | 22/1/7 | 5.4667 | 6 | 27/0/3 | 5.3667 | 6 | 26/1/3 | 5.6000 | 6 |
EPSDE | 15/13/2 | 2.6667 | 2 | 18/7/5 | 3.1667 | 2 | 18/5/7 | 3.7333 | 3 |
CGPSO | 27/0/3 | 5.8000 | 7 | 29/1/0 | 5.6333 | 7 | 30/0/0 | 5.7333 | 7 |
ACWOA | 29/0/1 | 7.1333 | 8 | 27/0/3 | 7.0667 | 8 | 26/0/4 | 6.7000 | 8 |
EOBLSSA | 24/0/6 | 4.8000 | 5 | 23/1/6 | 4.4667 | 4 | 22/3/5 | 3.7667 | 4 |
DECLS | 24/4/2 | 4.4333 | 4 | 27/3/0 | 4.7667 | 5 | 27/0/3 | 5.0667 | 5 |
GOTLBO | 16/7/7 | 3.4333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.6333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.3667 | 2 |
Method . | Dim = 30 . | Dim = 50 . | Dim = 100 . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . | +/−/= . | AVR . | Rank . |
BMSSA | ∼ | 2.1333 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7667 | 1 | ∼ | 1.7333 | 1 |
ALCPSO | 22/1/7 | 5.4667 | 6 | 27/0/3 | 5.3667 | 6 | 26/1/3 | 5.6000 | 6 |
EPSDE | 15/13/2 | 2.6667 | 2 | 18/7/5 | 3.1667 | 2 | 18/5/7 | 3.7333 | 3 |
CGPSO | 27/0/3 | 5.8000 | 7 | 29/1/0 | 5.6333 | 7 | 30/0/0 | 5.7333 | 7 |
ACWOA | 29/0/1 | 7.1333 | 8 | 27/0/3 | 7.0667 | 8 | 26/0/4 | 6.7000 | 8 |
EOBLSSA | 24/0/6 | 4.8000 | 5 | 23/1/6 | 4.4667 | 4 | 22/3/5 | 3.7667 | 4 |
DECLS | 24/4/2 | 4.4333 | 4 | 27/3/0 | 4.7667 | 5 | 27/0/3 | 5.0667 | 5 |
GOTLBO | 16/7/7 | 3.4333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.6333 | 3 | 19/5/6 | 3.3667 | 2 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.