Table 3

Cox proportional hazard models for age at final menstrual period (FMP) accounting for successive selection mechanisms

Model 1aModel 2bModel 3cModel 4d
Unadjusted for selection (nevents = 1804)
Incorporating FMP type (nevents = 2059)
+ Imputed for right censoring (nevents = 3302)
+ Adjusted for left truncation (nevents = 3302)
Racial group × FMP type (ref: White, natural FMP)Hazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIP
Natural FMP
 Black1.090.97–1.220.1311.050.94–1.180.3671.111.01–1.210.0231.151.04–1.270.008
 Chinese1.080.92–1.280.3361.040.88–1.230.6341.030.89–1.170.3421.020.87–1.160.411
 Hispanic1.271.03–1.570.0261.251.01–1.540.0371.191.04–1.340.0121.180.97–1.380.062
 Japanese1.020.88–1.190.7930.950.81–1.110.4980.970.83–1.100.6900.970.83–1.100.683
Surgical FMP
 White1.251.03–1.520.0251.341.15–1.530.0021.581.24–1.930.005
 Black2.592.10–3.190.0002.412.20–2.630.0003.022.58–3.450.000
 Chinesee0.940.52–1.700.8270.970.39–1.550.5421.570.71–2.430.151
 Hispanice1.831.10–3.060.0212.071.60–2.550.0012.632.02–3.230.001
 Japanesee1.881.11–3.200.0191.270.77–1.770.1761.430.99–1.870.055
Model 1aModel 2bModel 3cModel 4d
Unadjusted for selection (nevents = 1804)
Incorporating FMP type (nevents = 2059)
+ Imputed for right censoring (nevents = 3302)
+ Adjusted for left truncation (nevents = 3302)
Racial group × FMP type (ref: White, natural FMP)Hazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIP
Natural FMP
 Black1.090.97–1.220.1311.050.94–1.180.3671.111.01–1.210.0231.151.04–1.270.008
 Chinese1.080.92–1.280.3361.040.88–1.230.6341.030.89–1.170.3421.020.87–1.160.411
 Hispanic1.271.03–1.570.0261.251.01–1.540.0371.191.04–1.340.0121.180.97–1.380.062
 Japanese1.020.88–1.190.7930.950.81–1.110.4980.970.83–1.100.6900.970.83–1.100.683
Surgical FMP
 White1.251.03–1.520.0251.341.15–1.530.0021.581.24–1.930.005
 Black2.592.10–3.190.0002.412.20–2.630.0003.022.58–3.450.000
 Chinesee0.940.52–1.700.8270.970.39–1.550.5421.570.71–2.430.151
 Hispanice1.831.10–3.060.0212.071.60–2.550.0012.632.02–3.230.001
 Japanesee1.881.11–3.200.0191.270.77–1.770.1761.430.99–1.870.055

Each subsequent model has the ‘corrected’ features of the last with additional corrections, denoted by + sign.

a

Model 1: right censored for any missing FMPs and for observed surgical FMPs.

b

Model 2: only censors for unobserved FMPs and includes in observed surgical FMPs by incorporating an interaction term between racial/ethnic group and FMP type.

c

Model 3: additionally imputes data pooled across 10 imputed sets removing any right censoring on FMP.

d

Model 4: additionally incorporates inverse probability weights for left truncation.

e

Chinese (n =13), Hispanic (n =39), Japanese (n =16), all other groups >90 observations.

Table 3

Cox proportional hazard models for age at final menstrual period (FMP) accounting for successive selection mechanisms

Model 1aModel 2bModel 3cModel 4d
Unadjusted for selection (nevents = 1804)
Incorporating FMP type (nevents = 2059)
+ Imputed for right censoring (nevents = 3302)
+ Adjusted for left truncation (nevents = 3302)
Racial group × FMP type (ref: White, natural FMP)Hazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIP
Natural FMP
 Black1.090.97–1.220.1311.050.94–1.180.3671.111.01–1.210.0231.151.04–1.270.008
 Chinese1.080.92–1.280.3361.040.88–1.230.6341.030.89–1.170.3421.020.87–1.160.411
 Hispanic1.271.03–1.570.0261.251.01–1.540.0371.191.04–1.340.0121.180.97–1.380.062
 Japanese1.020.88–1.190.7930.950.81–1.110.4980.970.83–1.100.6900.970.83–1.100.683
Surgical FMP
 White1.251.03–1.520.0251.341.15–1.530.0021.581.24–1.930.005
 Black2.592.10–3.190.0002.412.20–2.630.0003.022.58–3.450.000
 Chinesee0.940.52–1.700.8270.970.39–1.550.5421.570.71–2.430.151
 Hispanice1.831.10–3.060.0212.071.60–2.550.0012.632.02–3.230.001
 Japanesee1.881.11–3.200.0191.270.77–1.770.1761.430.99–1.870.055
Model 1aModel 2bModel 3cModel 4d
Unadjusted for selection (nevents = 1804)
Incorporating FMP type (nevents = 2059)
+ Imputed for right censoring (nevents = 3302)
+ Adjusted for left truncation (nevents = 3302)
Racial group × FMP type (ref: White, natural FMP)Hazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIPHazard ratio95% CIP
Natural FMP
 Black1.090.97–1.220.1311.050.94–1.180.3671.111.01–1.210.0231.151.04–1.270.008
 Chinese1.080.92–1.280.3361.040.88–1.230.6341.030.89–1.170.3421.020.87–1.160.411
 Hispanic1.271.03–1.570.0261.251.01–1.540.0371.191.04–1.340.0121.180.97–1.380.062
 Japanese1.020.88–1.190.7930.950.81–1.110.4980.970.83–1.100.6900.970.83–1.100.683
Surgical FMP
 White1.251.03–1.520.0251.341.15–1.530.0021.581.24–1.930.005
 Black2.592.10–3.190.0002.412.20–2.630.0003.022.58–3.450.000
 Chinesee0.940.52–1.700.8270.970.39–1.550.5421.570.71–2.430.151
 Hispanice1.831.10–3.060.0212.071.60–2.550.0012.632.02–3.230.001
 Japanesee1.881.11–3.200.0191.270.77–1.770.1761.430.99–1.870.055

Each subsequent model has the ‘corrected’ features of the last with additional corrections, denoted by + sign.

a

Model 1: right censored for any missing FMPs and for observed surgical FMPs.

b

Model 2: only censors for unobserved FMPs and includes in observed surgical FMPs by incorporating an interaction term between racial/ethnic group and FMP type.

c

Model 3: additionally imputes data pooled across 10 imputed sets removing any right censoring on FMP.

d

Model 4: additionally incorporates inverse probability weights for left truncation.

e

Chinese (n =13), Hispanic (n =39), Japanese (n =16), all other groups >90 observations.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close