| Pollutants . | n (case/control) . | Odds ratios (95% CI) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 . | Model 2 . | ||
| PM2.5 | 399/399 | 5.99 (2.55-14.03) | 3.15 (1.03-9.68) |
| PM10 | 279/279 | 0.89 (0.67-1.18) | 1.19 (0.65-2.16) |
| NO2 | 171/171 | 0.96 (0.59-1.56) | 1.22 (0.53-2.82) |
| Ozone | 332/332 | 0.57 (0.38-0.85) | 1.66 (0.73-3.74) |
| Pollutants . | n (case/control) . | Odds ratios (95% CI) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 . | Model 2 . | ||
| PM2.5 | 399/399 | 5.99 (2.55-14.03) | 3.15 (1.03-9.68) |
| PM10 | 279/279 | 0.89 (0.67-1.18) | 1.19 (0.65-2.16) |
| NO2 | 171/171 | 0.96 (0.59-1.56) | 1.22 (0.53-2.82) |
| Ozone | 332/332 | 0.57 (0.38-0.85) | 1.66 (0.73-3.74) |
For PM2.5, PM10, and NO2, we used 5-µg/m3 unit increase of increase; for ozone, we used each 1 IQR increase (0.005 units). Model 1 adjusted for age, gender, and diagnosis year. Model 2 further adjusted for smoking status. We have missing exposure data for PM10 (120 cases), NO2 (228 cases), and ozone (67 cases) in this study due to missing air pollution exposure from local EPA monitors.
| Pollutants . | n (case/control) . | Odds ratios (95% CI) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 . | Model 2 . | ||
| PM2.5 | 399/399 | 5.99 (2.55-14.03) | 3.15 (1.03-9.68) |
| PM10 | 279/279 | 0.89 (0.67-1.18) | 1.19 (0.65-2.16) |
| NO2 | 171/171 | 0.96 (0.59-1.56) | 1.22 (0.53-2.82) |
| Ozone | 332/332 | 0.57 (0.38-0.85) | 1.66 (0.73-3.74) |
| Pollutants . | n (case/control) . | Odds ratios (95% CI) . | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 . | Model 2 . | ||
| PM2.5 | 399/399 | 5.99 (2.55-14.03) | 3.15 (1.03-9.68) |
| PM10 | 279/279 | 0.89 (0.67-1.18) | 1.19 (0.65-2.16) |
| NO2 | 171/171 | 0.96 (0.59-1.56) | 1.22 (0.53-2.82) |
| Ozone | 332/332 | 0.57 (0.38-0.85) | 1.66 (0.73-3.74) |
For PM2.5, PM10, and NO2, we used 5-µg/m3 unit increase of increase; for ozone, we used each 1 IQR increase (0.005 units). Model 1 adjusted for age, gender, and diagnosis year. Model 2 further adjusted for smoking status. We have missing exposure data for PM10 (120 cases), NO2 (228 cases), and ozone (67 cases) in this study due to missing air pollution exposure from local EPA monitors.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
