Table 5

Overview of Mean Amount of Extracellular Fluida at Level of Upper Limb in Each Treatment Group at Different Time Pointsb

Time PointEstimated Mean (95% CI) for Following Group:
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
B033.1 (26.1–40.1)32.3 (25.3–39.3)34.9 (28–41.8)
P24.4c (19.1–29.6)25.4c (20.2–30.7)23.9d (18.7–29.1)
P130.0 (22.2–37.8)29.5 (21.6–37.3)25.3c (17.6–33.0)
P320.9d (16.6–25.2)22.2d (17.8–26.5)21.1d (16.8–25.4)
P622.8d (17.1–28.5)22.6c (16.8–28.3)21.6d (16.0–27.3)
P1228.1 (20.0–36.2)24.1c (16.0–32.3)25.4c (17.3–33.4)
Time PointEstimated Mean (95% CI) for Following Group:
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
B033.1 (26.1–40.1)32.3 (25.3–39.3)34.9 (28–41.8)
P24.4c (19.1–29.6)25.4c (20.2–30.7)23.9d (18.7–29.1)
P130.0 (22.2–37.8)29.5 (21.6–37.3)25.3c (17.6–33.0)
P320.9d (16.6–25.2)22.2d (17.8–26.5)21.1d (16.8–25.4)
P622.8d (17.1–28.5)22.6c (16.8–28.3)21.6d (16.0–27.3)
P1228.1 (20.0–36.2)24.1c (16.0–32.3)25.4c (17.3–33.4)
a

Represented by L-Dex scores. B0 = baseline; MLD = manual lymph drainage; P = after intensive treatment; P1, P3, P6, and P12 = after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of maintenance treatment, respectively.

b

Significance of relative changes vs baseline in each treatment group at different time points. The P value for the overall interaction effect (group × time) was .950. MLD = manual lymph drainage.

c

With regard to within-group differences, P < .05 for changes in the estimated mean vs baseline that were statistically significant.

d

With regard to within-group differences, P < .0001 for changes in the estimated mean vs baseline that were statistically significant.

Table 5

Overview of Mean Amount of Extracellular Fluida at Level of Upper Limb in Each Treatment Group at Different Time Pointsb

Time PointEstimated Mean (95% CI) for Following Group:
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
B033.1 (26.1–40.1)32.3 (25.3–39.3)34.9 (28–41.8)
P24.4c (19.1–29.6)25.4c (20.2–30.7)23.9d (18.7–29.1)
P130.0 (22.2–37.8)29.5 (21.6–37.3)25.3c (17.6–33.0)
P320.9d (16.6–25.2)22.2d (17.8–26.5)21.1d (16.8–25.4)
P622.8d (17.1–28.5)22.6c (16.8–28.3)21.6d (16.0–27.3)
P1228.1 (20.0–36.2)24.1c (16.0–32.3)25.4c (17.3–33.4)
Time PointEstimated Mean (95% CI) for Following Group:
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
B033.1 (26.1–40.1)32.3 (25.3–39.3)34.9 (28–41.8)
P24.4c (19.1–29.6)25.4c (20.2–30.7)23.9d (18.7–29.1)
P130.0 (22.2–37.8)29.5 (21.6–37.3)25.3c (17.6–33.0)
P320.9d (16.6–25.2)22.2d (17.8–26.5)21.1d (16.8–25.4)
P622.8d (17.1–28.5)22.6c (16.8–28.3)21.6d (16.0–27.3)
P1228.1 (20.0–36.2)24.1c (16.0–32.3)25.4c (17.3–33.4)
a

Represented by L-Dex scores. B0 = baseline; MLD = manual lymph drainage; P = after intensive treatment; P1, P3, P6, and P12 = after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of maintenance treatment, respectively.

b

Significance of relative changes vs baseline in each treatment group at different time points. The P value for the overall interaction effect (group × time) was .950. MLD = manual lymph drainage.

c

With regard to within-group differences, P < .05 for changes in the estimated mean vs baseline that were statistically significant.

d

With regard to within-group differences, P < .0001 for changes in the estimated mean vs baseline that were statistically significant.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close