Table 3

Overview of Mean Amount of Local Tissue Water,a Mean Thickness of Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue,b Mean Presence of Thickened Skin,c Mean Skin Elasticity,d and Mean Presence of Skin Fibrosise at Level of Arm in Each Treatment Groupf

Parameter EvaluatedDescriptionTime PointMean Estimate (95% CI) for Following Group:P for Overall Interaction (Group × Time)P for Comparison of Changes Between Groups
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Traditional MLDFluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Placebo MLDTraditional MLD vs Placebo MLD
Accumulation of fluid in suprafascial tissueLocal tissue waterB01.418 (1.365–1.473)1.354 (1.303–1.406)1.406 (1.354–1.459).665
P1.372g (1.326–1.419)1.292g (1.247–1.336)1.344g (1.300–1.391)
P11.383 (1.328–1.438)1.315 (1.264–1.368)1.394 (1.340–1.449)
P31.363 (1.309–1.420)1.288g (1.236–1.342)1.358 (1.303–1.415)
P61.343g (1.290–1.399)1.298g (1.246–1.351)1.350g (1.297–1.405)
P121.343g (1.305–1.383)1.332 (1.294–1.373)1.335g (1.297–1.374)
Thickness of cutisB01.29 (1.22–1.36)1.27 (1.20–1.34)1.32 (1.24–1.35).422
P1.30 (1.23–1.37)1.29 (1.23–1.36)1.37 (1.31–1.44)
P61.27 (1.20–1.34)1.30 (1.23–1.38)1.27 (1.21–1.35)
P121.23 (1.16–1.30)1.28 (1.20–1.35)1.33 (1.25–1.41)
Thickness of subcutisB01.62 (1.49–1.76)1.52 (1.40–1.65)1.52 (1.40–1.65).118
P1.38h (1.28–1.49)1.40g (1.30–1.51)1.36g (1.26–1.46)
P61.38h (1.28–1.49)1.46 (1.36–1.58)1.30h (1.21–1.40)
P121.34h (1.23–1.47)1.46 (1.34–1.60)1.25g (1.25–1.49)
Thickness of cutis + subcutisB01.52 (1.42–1.63)1.44 (1.34–1.55)1.45 (1.35–1.56).180
P1.36g (1.27–1.27)1.38 (1.30–1.47)1.36 (1.28–1.45)
P61.35h (1.27–1.44)1.40 (1.31–1.49)1.29h (1.21–1.37)
P121.31h (1.22–1.41)1.40 (1.30–1.51)1.34g (1.24–1.44)
Thickness of skin and subcutis through palpationB04.43 (4.01–4.85)4.03 (3.61–4.45)4.65 (4.23–5.07).889
P4.62 (4.23–5.00)4.23 (3.84–4.63)4.57 (4.18–4.96)
P14.37 (3.96–4.78)4.25 (3.84–4.66)4.22 (3.81–4.62)
P34.25 (3.82–4.68)4.19 (3.76–4.62)4.22 (3.79–4.64)
P64.22 (3.77–4.67)4.03 (3.58–4.49)4.05g (3.60–4.50)
P124.09 (3.61–4.57)3.92 (3.44–4.40)4.17 (3.69–4.65)
Skin elasticitySkin elasticityB01.28 (1.19–1.37)1.26 (1.17–1.35)1.41 (1.31–1.51).741
P1.11h (1.04–1.18)1.06h (1.0–1.13)1.14h (1.07–1.21)
P11.15g (1.08–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.18h (1.11–1.26)
P31.16g (1.10–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.22)
P61.13g (1.07–1.20)1.10g (1.04–1.17)1.14h (1.08–1.22)
P121.19 (1.11–1.27)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.23)
Skin elasticity (through palpation)B00.49 (0.32–0.67)0.26 (0.12–0.41)0.24 (0.10–0.40).023g
P0.40 (0.22–0.59)0.44 (0.26–0.64)0.56g (0.37–0.78).128.024g.465
P10.37 (0.21–0.55)0.52g (0.35–0.72)0.42 (0.26–0.61).026g.073.657
P30.17g (0.03–0.32)0.45 (0.29–0.64)0.50g (0.33–0.69).002g<.001g.724
P60.15g (0.05–0.25)0.23 (0.13–0.35)0.28 (0.17–0.40).026g.007g.621
P120.22g (0.11–0.34)0.20 (0.09–0.32)0.24 (0.13–0.37).160.067.669
Parameter EvaluatedDescriptionTime PointMean Estimate (95% CI) for Following Group:P for Overall Interaction (Group × Time)P for Comparison of Changes Between Groups
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Traditional MLDFluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Placebo MLDTraditional MLD vs Placebo MLD
Accumulation of fluid in suprafascial tissueLocal tissue waterB01.418 (1.365–1.473)1.354 (1.303–1.406)1.406 (1.354–1.459).665
P1.372g (1.326–1.419)1.292g (1.247–1.336)1.344g (1.300–1.391)
P11.383 (1.328–1.438)1.315 (1.264–1.368)1.394 (1.340–1.449)
P31.363 (1.309–1.420)1.288g (1.236–1.342)1.358 (1.303–1.415)
P61.343g (1.290–1.399)1.298g (1.246–1.351)1.350g (1.297–1.405)
P121.343g (1.305–1.383)1.332 (1.294–1.373)1.335g (1.297–1.374)
Thickness of cutisB01.29 (1.22–1.36)1.27 (1.20–1.34)1.32 (1.24–1.35).422
P1.30 (1.23–1.37)1.29 (1.23–1.36)1.37 (1.31–1.44)
P61.27 (1.20–1.34)1.30 (1.23–1.38)1.27 (1.21–1.35)
P121.23 (1.16–1.30)1.28 (1.20–1.35)1.33 (1.25–1.41)
Thickness of subcutisB01.62 (1.49–1.76)1.52 (1.40–1.65)1.52 (1.40–1.65).118
P1.38h (1.28–1.49)1.40g (1.30–1.51)1.36g (1.26–1.46)
P61.38h (1.28–1.49)1.46 (1.36–1.58)1.30h (1.21–1.40)
P121.34h (1.23–1.47)1.46 (1.34–1.60)1.25g (1.25–1.49)
Thickness of cutis + subcutisB01.52 (1.42–1.63)1.44 (1.34–1.55)1.45 (1.35–1.56).180
P1.36g (1.27–1.27)1.38 (1.30–1.47)1.36 (1.28–1.45)
P61.35h (1.27–1.44)1.40 (1.31–1.49)1.29h (1.21–1.37)
P121.31h (1.22–1.41)1.40 (1.30–1.51)1.34g (1.24–1.44)
Thickness of skin and subcutis through palpationB04.43 (4.01–4.85)4.03 (3.61–4.45)4.65 (4.23–5.07).889
P4.62 (4.23–5.00)4.23 (3.84–4.63)4.57 (4.18–4.96)
P14.37 (3.96–4.78)4.25 (3.84–4.66)4.22 (3.81–4.62)
P34.25 (3.82–4.68)4.19 (3.76–4.62)4.22 (3.79–4.64)
P64.22 (3.77–4.67)4.03 (3.58–4.49)4.05g (3.60–4.50)
P124.09 (3.61–4.57)3.92 (3.44–4.40)4.17 (3.69–4.65)
Skin elasticitySkin elasticityB01.28 (1.19–1.37)1.26 (1.17–1.35)1.41 (1.31–1.51).741
P1.11h (1.04–1.18)1.06h (1.0–1.13)1.14h (1.07–1.21)
P11.15g (1.08–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.18h (1.11–1.26)
P31.16g (1.10–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.22)
P61.13g (1.07–1.20)1.10g (1.04–1.17)1.14h (1.08–1.22)
P121.19 (1.11–1.27)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.23)
Skin elasticity (through palpation)B00.49 (0.32–0.67)0.26 (0.12–0.41)0.24 (0.10–0.40).023g
P0.40 (0.22–0.59)0.44 (0.26–0.64)0.56g (0.37–0.78).128.024g.465
P10.37 (0.21–0.55)0.52g (0.35–0.72)0.42 (0.26–0.61).026g.073.657
P30.17g (0.03–0.32)0.45 (0.29–0.64)0.50g (0.33–0.69).002g<.001g.724
P60.15g (0.05–0.25)0.23 (0.13–0.35)0.28 (0.17–0.40).026g.007g.621
P120.22g (0.11–0.34)0.20 (0.09–0.32)0.24 (0.13–0.37).160.067.669
a

Represented by percentage of water content interlimb ratios. B0 = baseline; MLD = manual lymph drainage; P = after intensive treatment; P1, P3, P6, and P12 = after 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo of maintenance treatment, respectively.

b

Cutis, subcutis, and cutis + subcutis, represented by interlimb ratios.

c

Through palpation, represented by pinch test scores.

d

Represented by induration force interlimb ratios.

e

Represented by palpation test scores.

f

At different time points. Significance of relative changes versus baseline in each treatment group separately. P values for overall interaction effect and comparisons of changes between treatment groups in case of presence of significant interaction effect.

g

With regard to within-group differences, P < .05 for changes in the estimated mean versus baseline that were statistically significant.

h

With regard to within-group differences, P < .0001 for changes in the estimated mean versus baseline that were statistically significant. B0 = baseline; MLD = manual lymph drainage; P = after intensive treatment; P1, P3, P6, and P12 = after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of maintenance treatment, respectively.

Table 3

Overview of Mean Amount of Local Tissue Water,a Mean Thickness of Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue,b Mean Presence of Thickened Skin,c Mean Skin Elasticity,d and Mean Presence of Skin Fibrosise at Level of Arm in Each Treatment Groupf

Parameter EvaluatedDescriptionTime PointMean Estimate (95% CI) for Following Group:P for Overall Interaction (Group × Time)P for Comparison of Changes Between Groups
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Traditional MLDFluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Placebo MLDTraditional MLD vs Placebo MLD
Accumulation of fluid in suprafascial tissueLocal tissue waterB01.418 (1.365–1.473)1.354 (1.303–1.406)1.406 (1.354–1.459).665
P1.372g (1.326–1.419)1.292g (1.247–1.336)1.344g (1.300–1.391)
P11.383 (1.328–1.438)1.315 (1.264–1.368)1.394 (1.340–1.449)
P31.363 (1.309–1.420)1.288g (1.236–1.342)1.358 (1.303–1.415)
P61.343g (1.290–1.399)1.298g (1.246–1.351)1.350g (1.297–1.405)
P121.343g (1.305–1.383)1.332 (1.294–1.373)1.335g (1.297–1.374)
Thickness of cutisB01.29 (1.22–1.36)1.27 (1.20–1.34)1.32 (1.24–1.35).422
P1.30 (1.23–1.37)1.29 (1.23–1.36)1.37 (1.31–1.44)
P61.27 (1.20–1.34)1.30 (1.23–1.38)1.27 (1.21–1.35)
P121.23 (1.16–1.30)1.28 (1.20–1.35)1.33 (1.25–1.41)
Thickness of subcutisB01.62 (1.49–1.76)1.52 (1.40–1.65)1.52 (1.40–1.65).118
P1.38h (1.28–1.49)1.40g (1.30–1.51)1.36g (1.26–1.46)
P61.38h (1.28–1.49)1.46 (1.36–1.58)1.30h (1.21–1.40)
P121.34h (1.23–1.47)1.46 (1.34–1.60)1.25g (1.25–1.49)
Thickness of cutis + subcutisB01.52 (1.42–1.63)1.44 (1.34–1.55)1.45 (1.35–1.56).180
P1.36g (1.27–1.27)1.38 (1.30–1.47)1.36 (1.28–1.45)
P61.35h (1.27–1.44)1.40 (1.31–1.49)1.29h (1.21–1.37)
P121.31h (1.22–1.41)1.40 (1.30–1.51)1.34g (1.24–1.44)
Thickness of skin and subcutis through palpationB04.43 (4.01–4.85)4.03 (3.61–4.45)4.65 (4.23–5.07).889
P4.62 (4.23–5.00)4.23 (3.84–4.63)4.57 (4.18–4.96)
P14.37 (3.96–4.78)4.25 (3.84–4.66)4.22 (3.81–4.62)
P34.25 (3.82–4.68)4.19 (3.76–4.62)4.22 (3.79–4.64)
P64.22 (3.77–4.67)4.03 (3.58–4.49)4.05g (3.60–4.50)
P124.09 (3.61–4.57)3.92 (3.44–4.40)4.17 (3.69–4.65)
Skin elasticitySkin elasticityB01.28 (1.19–1.37)1.26 (1.17–1.35)1.41 (1.31–1.51).741
P1.11h (1.04–1.18)1.06h (1.0–1.13)1.14h (1.07–1.21)
P11.15g (1.08–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.18h (1.11–1.26)
P31.16g (1.10–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.22)
P61.13g (1.07–1.20)1.10g (1.04–1.17)1.14h (1.08–1.22)
P121.19 (1.11–1.27)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.23)
Skin elasticity (through palpation)B00.49 (0.32–0.67)0.26 (0.12–0.41)0.24 (0.10–0.40).023g
P0.40 (0.22–0.59)0.44 (0.26–0.64)0.56g (0.37–0.78).128.024g.465
P10.37 (0.21–0.55)0.52g (0.35–0.72)0.42 (0.26–0.61).026g.073.657
P30.17g (0.03–0.32)0.45 (0.29–0.64)0.50g (0.33–0.69).002g<.001g.724
P60.15g (0.05–0.25)0.23 (0.13–0.35)0.28 (0.17–0.40).026g.007g.621
P120.22g (0.11–0.34)0.20 (0.09–0.32)0.24 (0.13–0.37).160.067.669
Parameter EvaluatedDescriptionTime PointMean Estimate (95% CI) for Following Group:P for Overall Interaction (Group × Time)P for Comparison of Changes Between Groups
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLDTraditional MLDPlacebo MLD
Fluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Traditional MLDFluoroscopy-Guided MLD vs Placebo MLDTraditional MLD vs Placebo MLD
Accumulation of fluid in suprafascial tissueLocal tissue waterB01.418 (1.365–1.473)1.354 (1.303–1.406)1.406 (1.354–1.459).665
P1.372g (1.326–1.419)1.292g (1.247–1.336)1.344g (1.300–1.391)
P11.383 (1.328–1.438)1.315 (1.264–1.368)1.394 (1.340–1.449)
P31.363 (1.309–1.420)1.288g (1.236–1.342)1.358 (1.303–1.415)
P61.343g (1.290–1.399)1.298g (1.246–1.351)1.350g (1.297–1.405)
P121.343g (1.305–1.383)1.332 (1.294–1.373)1.335g (1.297–1.374)
Thickness of cutisB01.29 (1.22–1.36)1.27 (1.20–1.34)1.32 (1.24–1.35).422
P1.30 (1.23–1.37)1.29 (1.23–1.36)1.37 (1.31–1.44)
P61.27 (1.20–1.34)1.30 (1.23–1.38)1.27 (1.21–1.35)
P121.23 (1.16–1.30)1.28 (1.20–1.35)1.33 (1.25–1.41)
Thickness of subcutisB01.62 (1.49–1.76)1.52 (1.40–1.65)1.52 (1.40–1.65).118
P1.38h (1.28–1.49)1.40g (1.30–1.51)1.36g (1.26–1.46)
P61.38h (1.28–1.49)1.46 (1.36–1.58)1.30h (1.21–1.40)
P121.34h (1.23–1.47)1.46 (1.34–1.60)1.25g (1.25–1.49)
Thickness of cutis + subcutisB01.52 (1.42–1.63)1.44 (1.34–1.55)1.45 (1.35–1.56).180
P1.36g (1.27–1.27)1.38 (1.30–1.47)1.36 (1.28–1.45)
P61.35h (1.27–1.44)1.40 (1.31–1.49)1.29h (1.21–1.37)
P121.31h (1.22–1.41)1.40 (1.30–1.51)1.34g (1.24–1.44)
Thickness of skin and subcutis through palpationB04.43 (4.01–4.85)4.03 (3.61–4.45)4.65 (4.23–5.07).889
P4.62 (4.23–5.00)4.23 (3.84–4.63)4.57 (4.18–4.96)
P14.37 (3.96–4.78)4.25 (3.84–4.66)4.22 (3.81–4.62)
P34.25 (3.82–4.68)4.19 (3.76–4.62)4.22 (3.79–4.64)
P64.22 (3.77–4.67)4.03 (3.58–4.49)4.05g (3.60–4.50)
P124.09 (3.61–4.57)3.92 (3.44–4.40)4.17 (3.69–4.65)
Skin elasticitySkin elasticityB01.28 (1.19–1.37)1.26 (1.17–1.35)1.41 (1.31–1.51).741
P1.11h (1.04–1.18)1.06h (1.0–1.13)1.14h (1.07–1.21)
P11.15g (1.08–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.18h (1.11–1.26)
P31.16g (1.10–1.23)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.22)
P61.13g (1.07–1.20)1.10g (1.04–1.17)1.14h (1.08–1.22)
P121.19 (1.11–1.27)1.07h (1.01–1.14)1.15h (1.08–1.23)
Skin elasticity (through palpation)B00.49 (0.32–0.67)0.26 (0.12–0.41)0.24 (0.10–0.40).023g
P0.40 (0.22–0.59)0.44 (0.26–0.64)0.56g (0.37–0.78).128.024g.465
P10.37 (0.21–0.55)0.52g (0.35–0.72)0.42 (0.26–0.61).026g.073.657
P30.17g (0.03–0.32)0.45 (0.29–0.64)0.50g (0.33–0.69).002g<.001g.724
P60.15g (0.05–0.25)0.23 (0.13–0.35)0.28 (0.17–0.40).026g.007g.621
P120.22g (0.11–0.34)0.20 (0.09–0.32)0.24 (0.13–0.37).160.067.669
a

Represented by percentage of water content interlimb ratios. B0 = baseline; MLD = manual lymph drainage; P = after intensive treatment; P1, P3, P6, and P12 = after 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo of maintenance treatment, respectively.

b

Cutis, subcutis, and cutis + subcutis, represented by interlimb ratios.

c

Through palpation, represented by pinch test scores.

d

Represented by induration force interlimb ratios.

e

Represented by palpation test scores.

f

At different time points. Significance of relative changes versus baseline in each treatment group separately. P values for overall interaction effect and comparisons of changes between treatment groups in case of presence of significant interaction effect.

g

With regard to within-group differences, P < .05 for changes in the estimated mean versus baseline that were statistically significant.

h

With regard to within-group differences, P < .0001 for changes in the estimated mean versus baseline that were statistically significant. B0 = baseline; MLD = manual lymph drainage; P = after intensive treatment; P1, P3, P6, and P12 = after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of maintenance treatment, respectively.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close