Table A2

Labor mobility and market factor loadings of double-sorted portfolios

Low competition
High competition
LMLLMMLMHH–LLMLLMMLMHH–L

A. Full sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.35–0.160.030.38–0.65–0.090.421.08
(–2.72)(–1.40)(0.27)(6.17)(–3.47)(–0.61)(2.32)(12.84)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT0.940.940.87–0.071.111.101.150.04
(17.24)(20.92)(23.40)(–1.43)(15.45)(10.94)(22.87)(0.54)
LMH-L–0.30–0.110.070.37–0.60–0.040.481.08
(–4.39)(–2.00)(1.08)(6.42)(–6.55)(–0.31)(7.45)(13.10)


B. All-but-microcaps sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.40–0.21–0.170.23–0.390.100.480.87
(–2.42)(–1.43)(–1.14)(4.68)(–1.79)(0.42)(1.83)(6.73)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT1.131.071.160.031.471.381.36–0.11
(19.18)(32.72)(24.03)(0.94)(19.99)(13.99)(24.64)(–1.34)
LMH-L–0.34–0.16–0.110.23–0.320.170.550.87
(–3.92)(–2.13)(–1.57)(4.63)(–3.05)(1.35)(4.15)(6.39)
Low competition
High competition
LMLLMMLMHH–LLMLLMMLMHH–L

A. Full sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.35–0.160.030.38–0.65–0.090.421.08
(–2.72)(–1.40)(0.27)(6.17)(–3.47)(–0.61)(2.32)(12.84)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT0.940.940.87–0.071.111.101.150.04
(17.24)(20.92)(23.40)(–1.43)(15.45)(10.94)(22.87)(0.54)
LMH-L–0.30–0.110.070.37–0.60–0.040.481.08
(–4.39)(–2.00)(1.08)(6.42)(–6.55)(–0.31)(7.45)(13.10)


B. All-but-microcaps sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.40–0.21–0.170.23–0.390.100.480.87
(–2.42)(–1.43)(–1.14)(4.68)(–1.79)(0.42)(1.83)(6.73)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT1.131.071.160.031.471.381.36–0.11
(19.18)(32.72)(24.03)(0.94)(19.99)(13.99)(24.64)(–1.34)
LMH-L–0.34–0.16–0.110.23–0.320.170.550.87
(–3.92)(–2.13)(–1.57)(4.63)(–3.05)(1.35)(4.15)(6.39)

The table reports risk factor loadings from the time-series regressions of portfolio excess returns (in Table 3) on: (1) a constant and the (high minus low) labor mobility factor of Donangelo (2014), denoted by LMH-L; and (2) a constant, LMH-L, and the value-weighted market excess return (MKT) factor. Details on LMH-L can be found in Donangelo (2014). The full-sample includes all NYSE-, AMEX-, and NASDAQ-listed nonfinancial and nonregulated ordinary common stocks for which both nonmissing product market competition and labor mobility estimates in a given year t are available. The all-but-microcaps sample excludes stocks with an end-of-June market value of equity below the 20th percentile of the NYSE market capitalization distribution and the remaining stocks are used to compute the breakpoints for product market competition and labor mobility separately. H–L is the high-minus-low portfolio. Numbers in parentheses are t-statistics adjusted following Newey and West (1987). The sample period is from January 1990 to December 2016. See also the legends to Tables 1 and 3.

Table A2

Labor mobility and market factor loadings of double-sorted portfolios

Low competition
High competition
LMLLMMLMHH–LLMLLMMLMHH–L

A. Full sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.35–0.160.030.38–0.65–0.090.421.08
(–2.72)(–1.40)(0.27)(6.17)(–3.47)(–0.61)(2.32)(12.84)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT0.940.940.87–0.071.111.101.150.04
(17.24)(20.92)(23.40)(–1.43)(15.45)(10.94)(22.87)(0.54)
LMH-L–0.30–0.110.070.37–0.60–0.040.481.08
(–4.39)(–2.00)(1.08)(6.42)(–6.55)(–0.31)(7.45)(13.10)


B. All-but-microcaps sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.40–0.21–0.170.23–0.390.100.480.87
(–2.42)(–1.43)(–1.14)(4.68)(–1.79)(0.42)(1.83)(6.73)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT1.131.071.160.031.471.381.36–0.11
(19.18)(32.72)(24.03)(0.94)(19.99)(13.99)(24.64)(–1.34)
LMH-L–0.34–0.16–0.110.23–0.320.170.550.87
(–3.92)(–2.13)(–1.57)(4.63)(–3.05)(1.35)(4.15)(6.39)
Low competition
High competition
LMLLMMLMHH–LLMLLMMLMHH–L

A. Full sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.35–0.160.030.38–0.65–0.090.421.08
(–2.72)(–1.40)(0.27)(6.17)(–3.47)(–0.61)(2.32)(12.84)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT0.940.940.87–0.071.111.101.150.04
(17.24)(20.92)(23.40)(–1.43)(15.45)(10.94)(22.87)(0.54)
LMH-L–0.30–0.110.070.37–0.60–0.040.481.08
(–4.39)(–2.00)(1.08)(6.42)(–6.55)(–0.31)(7.45)(13.10)


B. All-but-microcaps sample
LMH-L factor
LMH-L–0.40–0.21–0.170.23–0.390.100.480.87
(–2.42)(–1.43)(–1.14)(4.68)(–1.79)(0.42)(1.83)(6.73)
MKT and LMH-L factors
MKT1.131.071.160.031.471.381.36–0.11
(19.18)(32.72)(24.03)(0.94)(19.99)(13.99)(24.64)(–1.34)
LMH-L–0.34–0.16–0.110.23–0.320.170.550.87
(–3.92)(–2.13)(–1.57)(4.63)(–3.05)(1.35)(4.15)(6.39)

The table reports risk factor loadings from the time-series regressions of portfolio excess returns (in Table 3) on: (1) a constant and the (high minus low) labor mobility factor of Donangelo (2014), denoted by LMH-L; and (2) a constant, LMH-L, and the value-weighted market excess return (MKT) factor. Details on LMH-L can be found in Donangelo (2014). The full-sample includes all NYSE-, AMEX-, and NASDAQ-listed nonfinancial and nonregulated ordinary common stocks for which both nonmissing product market competition and labor mobility estimates in a given year t are available. The all-but-microcaps sample excludes stocks with an end-of-June market value of equity below the 20th percentile of the NYSE market capitalization distribution and the remaining stocks are used to compute the breakpoints for product market competition and labor mobility separately. H–L is the high-minus-low portfolio. Numbers in parentheses are t-statistics adjusted following Newey and West (1987). The sample period is from January 1990 to December 2016. See also the legends to Tables 1 and 3.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close