Table 7.

Play materials in the household—medium term.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
Types of toysHomemadeFrom shopObjects in HHObjects outside HHDrawing materialPuzzlesColour/sizeCountingPlay material index
Control group—base
 Light treatment (LT)0.349|$^{***}$|0.360|$^{**}$|0.0350.076|$-$|0.0110.186|$^{**}$|0.1070.1990.293|$^{**}$|
(0.091)(0.142)(0.062)(0.051)(0.056)(0.062)(0.081)(0.139)(0.118)
 Full treatment (FT)0.329|$^{**}$|0.0970.120|$^{*}$||$-$|0.0840.201|$^{**}$|0.182|$^{**}$|0.1800.1530.285|$^{**}$|
(0.106)(0.096)(0.055)(0.063)(0.070)(0.063)(0.136)(0.117)(0.109)
WILD p-values LT0.0130.0840.6170.2730.8540.0410.3430.2490.020
WILD p-values FT0.0190.4140.1140.2930.0470.0330.3180.3420.078
Romano–Wolf p-values LT0.0050.0480.7550.3400.7980.0210.3740.340
Romano–Wolf p-values FT0.0170.4320.0830.4320.0230.0230.4320.432
t-test LT = FT
p-value0.8110.0500.2960.0220.0460.9650.5920.6530.945
Observations1,1051,1051,1051,1051,1051,1041,1041,1051,105
|$R^{2}$|0.0440.0410.0080.0110.0180.0240.0100.0130.030
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
Types of toysHomemadeFrom shopObjects in HHObjects outside HHDrawing materialPuzzlesColour/sizeCountingPlay material index
Control group—base
 Light treatment (LT)0.349|$^{***}$|0.360|$^{**}$|0.0350.076|$-$|0.0110.186|$^{**}$|0.1070.1990.293|$^{**}$|
(0.091)(0.142)(0.062)(0.051)(0.056)(0.062)(0.081)(0.139)(0.118)
 Full treatment (FT)0.329|$^{**}$|0.0970.120|$^{*}$||$-$|0.0840.201|$^{**}$|0.182|$^{**}$|0.1800.1530.285|$^{**}$|
(0.106)(0.096)(0.055)(0.063)(0.070)(0.063)(0.136)(0.117)(0.109)
WILD p-values LT0.0130.0840.6170.2730.8540.0410.3430.2490.020
WILD p-values FT0.0190.4140.1140.2930.0470.0330.3180.3420.078
Romano–Wolf p-values LT0.0050.0480.7550.3400.7980.0210.3740.340
Romano–Wolf p-values FT0.0170.4320.0830.4320.0230.0230.4320.432
t-test LT = FT
p-value0.8110.0500.2960.0220.0460.9650.5920.6530.945
Observations1,1051,1051,1051,1051,1051,1041,1041,1051,105
|$R^{2}$|0.0440.0410.0080.0110.0180.0240.0100.0130.030

Notes: The table presents the treatment effects on material investment. The sample includes mothers surveyed in the follow-up survey (2018). All estimates show results from OLS regressions based on equation (2). All regressions include control variables as defined in Table 1 and sampling weights. The dependent variables in columns (1)–(8) include standardized z-scores from the HOME-SF, calculated by subtracting the control group mean and dividing by the control group standard deviation at follow-up. The dependent variable in column (9) is the play material index calculated by taking the average of the eight HOME-SF z-scores.

p < 10%, **p < 5%, ***p < 1%. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the sector level. WILD cluster bootstrap with 9,999 replications and residuals drawn from Webb’s 6-point distribution are reported below the estimates (Cameron, Gelbach, and Miller 2008; Roodman et al. 2019). Two tailed p-values from a 5,000 replications Romano–Wolf step-down procedure (Romano and Wolf 2005; Clarke, Romano, and Wolf 2020) are shown below the estimates. A t-test of LT = FT is presented with the statistical significance of the test expressed in p-value. Observations and the R squared are presented at the bottom of the table.

Table 7.

Play materials in the household—medium term.

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
Types of toysHomemadeFrom shopObjects in HHObjects outside HHDrawing materialPuzzlesColour/sizeCountingPlay material index
Control group—base
 Light treatment (LT)0.349|$^{***}$|0.360|$^{**}$|0.0350.076|$-$|0.0110.186|$^{**}$|0.1070.1990.293|$^{**}$|
(0.091)(0.142)(0.062)(0.051)(0.056)(0.062)(0.081)(0.139)(0.118)
 Full treatment (FT)0.329|$^{**}$|0.0970.120|$^{*}$||$-$|0.0840.201|$^{**}$|0.182|$^{**}$|0.1800.1530.285|$^{**}$|
(0.106)(0.096)(0.055)(0.063)(0.070)(0.063)(0.136)(0.117)(0.109)
WILD p-values LT0.0130.0840.6170.2730.8540.0410.3430.2490.020
WILD p-values FT0.0190.4140.1140.2930.0470.0330.3180.3420.078
Romano–Wolf p-values LT0.0050.0480.7550.3400.7980.0210.3740.340
Romano–Wolf p-values FT0.0170.4320.0830.4320.0230.0230.4320.432
t-test LT = FT
p-value0.8110.0500.2960.0220.0460.9650.5920.6530.945
Observations1,1051,1051,1051,1051,1051,1041,1041,1051,105
|$R^{2}$|0.0440.0410.0080.0110.0180.0240.0100.0130.030
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
Types of toysHomemadeFrom shopObjects in HHObjects outside HHDrawing materialPuzzlesColour/sizeCountingPlay material index
Control group—base
 Light treatment (LT)0.349|$^{***}$|0.360|$^{**}$|0.0350.076|$-$|0.0110.186|$^{**}$|0.1070.1990.293|$^{**}$|
(0.091)(0.142)(0.062)(0.051)(0.056)(0.062)(0.081)(0.139)(0.118)
 Full treatment (FT)0.329|$^{**}$|0.0970.120|$^{*}$||$-$|0.0840.201|$^{**}$|0.182|$^{**}$|0.1800.1530.285|$^{**}$|
(0.106)(0.096)(0.055)(0.063)(0.070)(0.063)(0.136)(0.117)(0.109)
WILD p-values LT0.0130.0840.6170.2730.8540.0410.3430.2490.020
WILD p-values FT0.0190.4140.1140.2930.0470.0330.3180.3420.078
Romano–Wolf p-values LT0.0050.0480.7550.3400.7980.0210.3740.340
Romano–Wolf p-values FT0.0170.4320.0830.4320.0230.0230.4320.432
t-test LT = FT
p-value0.8110.0500.2960.0220.0460.9650.5920.6530.945
Observations1,1051,1051,1051,1051,1051,1041,1041,1051,105
|$R^{2}$|0.0440.0410.0080.0110.0180.0240.0100.0130.030

Notes: The table presents the treatment effects on material investment. The sample includes mothers surveyed in the follow-up survey (2018). All estimates show results from OLS regressions based on equation (2). All regressions include control variables as defined in Table 1 and sampling weights. The dependent variables in columns (1)–(8) include standardized z-scores from the HOME-SF, calculated by subtracting the control group mean and dividing by the control group standard deviation at follow-up. The dependent variable in column (9) is the play material index calculated by taking the average of the eight HOME-SF z-scores.

p < 10%, **p < 5%, ***p < 1%. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the sector level. WILD cluster bootstrap with 9,999 replications and residuals drawn from Webb’s 6-point distribution are reported below the estimates (Cameron, Gelbach, and Miller 2008; Roodman et al. 2019). Two tailed p-values from a 5,000 replications Romano–Wolf step-down procedure (Romano and Wolf 2005; Clarke, Romano, and Wolf 2020) are shown below the estimates. A t-test of LT = FT is presented with the statistical significance of the test expressed in p-value. Observations and the R squared are presented at the bottom of the table.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close