Table 2.

Top 10 and five (bold items) features related to clinicians’ diagnosis on clinically relevant knee OA

GP diagnosis based on clinical dataSP diagnosis based on clinical dataGP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic dataSP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic data
Demographics and medical historyNoneNoneNoneNone
SymptomsT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC function score
T8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC pain scoreT10 WOMAC painT10 WOMAC stiffness score
T5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC stiffness scoreT5 WOMAC pain score
T10 knee stiffness-No
T10 knee stiffness-Yes
Physical examinationNoneT10 Joint line tenderness – NegativeaT10 knee flexion degreeT10 Joint line tenderness – Positive
T10 Joint line tenderness – PositiveaT8 knee flexion degree
Radiographic featuresT10 medial joint space narrowing gradeT10 KL grade
T5 medial tibial osteophyte gradeT10 medial femoral osteophyte grade
T8 KL grade
T5 KL grade
GP diagnosis based on clinical dataSP diagnosis based on clinical dataGP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic dataSP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic data
Demographics and medical historyNoneNoneNoneNone
SymptomsT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC function score
T8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC pain scoreT10 WOMAC painT10 WOMAC stiffness score
T5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC stiffness scoreT5 WOMAC pain score
T10 knee stiffness-No
T10 knee stiffness-Yes
Physical examinationNoneT10 Joint line tenderness – NegativeaT10 knee flexion degreeT10 Joint line tenderness – Positive
T10 Joint line tenderness – PositiveaT8 knee flexion degree
Radiographic featuresT10 medial joint space narrowing gradeT10 KL grade
T5 medial tibial osteophyte gradeT10 medial femoral osteophyte grade
T8 KL grade
T5 KL grade
a

In the random forest model, joint line tenderness tested positive indicates the knee is more likely to have OA; negative indicates have no OA.

GP: general practitioner; SP: secondary care physician; T5 (8,10): 5 (8,10)-year follow-up; KL: Kellgren and Lawrence.

Table 2.

Top 10 and five (bold items) features related to clinicians’ diagnosis on clinically relevant knee OA

GP diagnosis based on clinical dataSP diagnosis based on clinical dataGP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic dataSP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic data
Demographics and medical historyNoneNoneNoneNone
SymptomsT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC function score
T8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC pain scoreT10 WOMAC painT10 WOMAC stiffness score
T5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC stiffness scoreT5 WOMAC pain score
T10 knee stiffness-No
T10 knee stiffness-Yes
Physical examinationNoneT10 Joint line tenderness – NegativeaT10 knee flexion degreeT10 Joint line tenderness – Positive
T10 Joint line tenderness – PositiveaT8 knee flexion degree
Radiographic featuresT10 medial joint space narrowing gradeT10 KL grade
T5 medial tibial osteophyte gradeT10 medial femoral osteophyte grade
T8 KL grade
T5 KL grade
GP diagnosis based on clinical dataSP diagnosis based on clinical dataGP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic dataSP diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic data
Demographics and medical historyNoneNoneNoneNone
SymptomsT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT10 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT10 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC total scoreT8 WOMAC function score
T8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT8 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total scoreT5 WOMAC total score
T10 WOMAC pain scoreT10 WOMAC painT10 WOMAC stiffness score
T5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function scoreT5 WOMAC function score
T5 WOMAC stiffness scoreT5 WOMAC pain score
T10 knee stiffness-No
T10 knee stiffness-Yes
Physical examinationNoneT10 Joint line tenderness – NegativeaT10 knee flexion degreeT10 Joint line tenderness – Positive
T10 Joint line tenderness – PositiveaT8 knee flexion degree
Radiographic featuresT10 medial joint space narrowing gradeT10 KL grade
T5 medial tibial osteophyte gradeT10 medial femoral osteophyte grade
T8 KL grade
T5 KL grade
a

In the random forest model, joint line tenderness tested positive indicates the knee is more likely to have OA; negative indicates have no OA.

GP: general practitioner; SP: secondary care physician; T5 (8,10): 5 (8,10)-year follow-up; KL: Kellgren and Lawrence.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close