Table 2.

Performance of TEPOC and CA125 to detect ovarian cancer in validation cohorts.

AUC (95% CI)ACC (95% CI), %SN (95% CI), %SP (95% CI), %PPV (95% CI), %NPV (95% CI), %KappaF1AUC
P-value
All validation
TEPOC0.918 (0.889–0.948)83.8 (79.6–87.4)85.3 (78.7–90.4)82.7 (76.9–87.6)78.7 (71.7–84.6)88.2 (82.8–92.4)0.6720.818<0.001
CA1250.804 (0.750–0.857)75.9 (70.4–80.9)78.6 (71.2–84.8)72.4 (63.3–80.3)79.1 (71.8–85.2)71.8 (62.7–79.7)0.5090.788
TEPOC+CA1250.922 (0.889–0.955)85.9 (81.2–89.8)86.4 (79.9–91.4)85.3 (77.6–91.2)88.7 (82.5–93.3)82.5 (74.5–88.8)0.7140.875<0.001
VC1
TEPOC0.923 (0.855–0.990)84.9 (74.6–92.2)95.0 (83.1–99.4)72.7 (54.5–86.7)80.9 (66.7–90.9)92.3 (74.9–99.1)0.6900.8740.013
CA1250.735 (0.615–0.855)75.3 (63.9–84.7)82.5 (67.2–92.7)66.7 (48.2–82.0)75.0 (59.7–86.8)75.9 (56.5–89.7)0.4970.786
TEPOC+CA1250.955 (0.912–0.997)87.7 (77.9–94.2)92.5 (79.6–98.4)81.8 (64.5–93.0)86.0 (72.1–94.7)90.0 (73.5–97.9)0.7490.892<0.001
VC2
TEPOC0.918 (0.872–0.963)84.0 (77.4–89.2)86.2 (77.1–92.7)81.3 (70.7–89.4)84.3 (75.0–91.1)83.6 (73.0–91.2)0.6770.8520.033
CA1250.836 (0.774–0.899)77.2 (69.9–83.4)79.3 (69.3–87.3)74.7 (63.3–84.0)78.4 (68.4–86.5)75.7 (64.3–84.9)0.5400.789
TEPOC+CA1250.939 (0.901–0.977)87.7 (81.6–92.3)89.7 (81.3–95.2)85.3 (75.3–92.4)87.6 (79.0–93.7)87.7 (77.9–94.2)0.7510.8860.002
VC3
TEPOC0.887 (0.813–0.960)82.9 (75.3–89.0)69.0 (49.2–84.7)87.0 (78.8–92.9)60.6 (42.1–77.1)90.6 (82.9–95.6)0.5340.6450.491
CA1250.824 (0.663–0.985)71.4 (53.7–85.4)70.4 (49.8–86.2)75.0 (34.9–96.8)90.5 (69.6–98.8)42.9 (17.7–71.1)0.3590.792
TEPOC+CA1250.917 (0.824–1.000)74.3 (56.7–87.5)66.7 (46.0–83.5)100.0 (63.1–100.0)100.0 (81.5–100.0)47.1 (23.0–72.2)0.4780.8000.284
AUC (95% CI)ACC (95% CI), %SN (95% CI), %SP (95% CI), %PPV (95% CI), %NPV (95% CI), %KappaF1AUC
P-value
All validation
TEPOC0.918 (0.889–0.948)83.8 (79.6–87.4)85.3 (78.7–90.4)82.7 (76.9–87.6)78.7 (71.7–84.6)88.2 (82.8–92.4)0.6720.818<0.001
CA1250.804 (0.750–0.857)75.9 (70.4–80.9)78.6 (71.2–84.8)72.4 (63.3–80.3)79.1 (71.8–85.2)71.8 (62.7–79.7)0.5090.788
TEPOC+CA1250.922 (0.889–0.955)85.9 (81.2–89.8)86.4 (79.9–91.4)85.3 (77.6–91.2)88.7 (82.5–93.3)82.5 (74.5–88.8)0.7140.875<0.001
VC1
TEPOC0.923 (0.855–0.990)84.9 (74.6–92.2)95.0 (83.1–99.4)72.7 (54.5–86.7)80.9 (66.7–90.9)92.3 (74.9–99.1)0.6900.8740.013
CA1250.735 (0.615–0.855)75.3 (63.9–84.7)82.5 (67.2–92.7)66.7 (48.2–82.0)75.0 (59.7–86.8)75.9 (56.5–89.7)0.4970.786
TEPOC+CA1250.955 (0.912–0.997)87.7 (77.9–94.2)92.5 (79.6–98.4)81.8 (64.5–93.0)86.0 (72.1–94.7)90.0 (73.5–97.9)0.7490.892<0.001
VC2
TEPOC0.918 (0.872–0.963)84.0 (77.4–89.2)86.2 (77.1–92.7)81.3 (70.7–89.4)84.3 (75.0–91.1)83.6 (73.0–91.2)0.6770.8520.033
CA1250.836 (0.774–0.899)77.2 (69.9–83.4)79.3 (69.3–87.3)74.7 (63.3–84.0)78.4 (68.4–86.5)75.7 (64.3–84.9)0.5400.789
TEPOC+CA1250.939 (0.901–0.977)87.7 (81.6–92.3)89.7 (81.3–95.2)85.3 (75.3–92.4)87.6 (79.0–93.7)87.7 (77.9–94.2)0.7510.8860.002
VC3
TEPOC0.887 (0.813–0.960)82.9 (75.3–89.0)69.0 (49.2–84.7)87.0 (78.8–92.9)60.6 (42.1–77.1)90.6 (82.9–95.6)0.5340.6450.491
CA1250.824 (0.663–0.985)71.4 (53.7–85.4)70.4 (49.8–86.2)75.0 (34.9–96.8)90.5 (69.6–98.8)42.9 (17.7–71.1)0.3590.792
TEPOC+CA1250.917 (0.824–1.000)74.3 (56.7–87.5)66.7 (46.0–83.5)100.0 (63.1–100.0)100.0 (81.5–100.0)47.1 (23.0–72.2)0.4780.8000.284

Predictions of TEPOC and the combination model were compared with those of CA125 using a two-sided DeLong’s test (AUC P-value). Abbreviations: TEPOC, tumor-educated platelet-derived gene panel of ovarian cancer; CA125, cancer antigen 125; TEPOC+CA125, the combination of TEPOC and CA125; AUC, area under the curve; ACC, accuracy; SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.

Table 2.

Performance of TEPOC and CA125 to detect ovarian cancer in validation cohorts.

AUC (95% CI)ACC (95% CI), %SN (95% CI), %SP (95% CI), %PPV (95% CI), %NPV (95% CI), %KappaF1AUC
P-value
All validation
TEPOC0.918 (0.889–0.948)83.8 (79.6–87.4)85.3 (78.7–90.4)82.7 (76.9–87.6)78.7 (71.7–84.6)88.2 (82.8–92.4)0.6720.818<0.001
CA1250.804 (0.750–0.857)75.9 (70.4–80.9)78.6 (71.2–84.8)72.4 (63.3–80.3)79.1 (71.8–85.2)71.8 (62.7–79.7)0.5090.788
TEPOC+CA1250.922 (0.889–0.955)85.9 (81.2–89.8)86.4 (79.9–91.4)85.3 (77.6–91.2)88.7 (82.5–93.3)82.5 (74.5–88.8)0.7140.875<0.001
VC1
TEPOC0.923 (0.855–0.990)84.9 (74.6–92.2)95.0 (83.1–99.4)72.7 (54.5–86.7)80.9 (66.7–90.9)92.3 (74.9–99.1)0.6900.8740.013
CA1250.735 (0.615–0.855)75.3 (63.9–84.7)82.5 (67.2–92.7)66.7 (48.2–82.0)75.0 (59.7–86.8)75.9 (56.5–89.7)0.4970.786
TEPOC+CA1250.955 (0.912–0.997)87.7 (77.9–94.2)92.5 (79.6–98.4)81.8 (64.5–93.0)86.0 (72.1–94.7)90.0 (73.5–97.9)0.7490.892<0.001
VC2
TEPOC0.918 (0.872–0.963)84.0 (77.4–89.2)86.2 (77.1–92.7)81.3 (70.7–89.4)84.3 (75.0–91.1)83.6 (73.0–91.2)0.6770.8520.033
CA1250.836 (0.774–0.899)77.2 (69.9–83.4)79.3 (69.3–87.3)74.7 (63.3–84.0)78.4 (68.4–86.5)75.7 (64.3–84.9)0.5400.789
TEPOC+CA1250.939 (0.901–0.977)87.7 (81.6–92.3)89.7 (81.3–95.2)85.3 (75.3–92.4)87.6 (79.0–93.7)87.7 (77.9–94.2)0.7510.8860.002
VC3
TEPOC0.887 (0.813–0.960)82.9 (75.3–89.0)69.0 (49.2–84.7)87.0 (78.8–92.9)60.6 (42.1–77.1)90.6 (82.9–95.6)0.5340.6450.491
CA1250.824 (0.663–0.985)71.4 (53.7–85.4)70.4 (49.8–86.2)75.0 (34.9–96.8)90.5 (69.6–98.8)42.9 (17.7–71.1)0.3590.792
TEPOC+CA1250.917 (0.824–1.000)74.3 (56.7–87.5)66.7 (46.0–83.5)100.0 (63.1–100.0)100.0 (81.5–100.0)47.1 (23.0–72.2)0.4780.8000.284
AUC (95% CI)ACC (95% CI), %SN (95% CI), %SP (95% CI), %PPV (95% CI), %NPV (95% CI), %KappaF1AUC
P-value
All validation
TEPOC0.918 (0.889–0.948)83.8 (79.6–87.4)85.3 (78.7–90.4)82.7 (76.9–87.6)78.7 (71.7–84.6)88.2 (82.8–92.4)0.6720.818<0.001
CA1250.804 (0.750–0.857)75.9 (70.4–80.9)78.6 (71.2–84.8)72.4 (63.3–80.3)79.1 (71.8–85.2)71.8 (62.7–79.7)0.5090.788
TEPOC+CA1250.922 (0.889–0.955)85.9 (81.2–89.8)86.4 (79.9–91.4)85.3 (77.6–91.2)88.7 (82.5–93.3)82.5 (74.5–88.8)0.7140.875<0.001
VC1
TEPOC0.923 (0.855–0.990)84.9 (74.6–92.2)95.0 (83.1–99.4)72.7 (54.5–86.7)80.9 (66.7–90.9)92.3 (74.9–99.1)0.6900.8740.013
CA1250.735 (0.615–0.855)75.3 (63.9–84.7)82.5 (67.2–92.7)66.7 (48.2–82.0)75.0 (59.7–86.8)75.9 (56.5–89.7)0.4970.786
TEPOC+CA1250.955 (0.912–0.997)87.7 (77.9–94.2)92.5 (79.6–98.4)81.8 (64.5–93.0)86.0 (72.1–94.7)90.0 (73.5–97.9)0.7490.892<0.001
VC2
TEPOC0.918 (0.872–0.963)84.0 (77.4–89.2)86.2 (77.1–92.7)81.3 (70.7–89.4)84.3 (75.0–91.1)83.6 (73.0–91.2)0.6770.8520.033
CA1250.836 (0.774–0.899)77.2 (69.9–83.4)79.3 (69.3–87.3)74.7 (63.3–84.0)78.4 (68.4–86.5)75.7 (64.3–84.9)0.5400.789
TEPOC+CA1250.939 (0.901–0.977)87.7 (81.6–92.3)89.7 (81.3–95.2)85.3 (75.3–92.4)87.6 (79.0–93.7)87.7 (77.9–94.2)0.7510.8860.002
VC3
TEPOC0.887 (0.813–0.960)82.9 (75.3–89.0)69.0 (49.2–84.7)87.0 (78.8–92.9)60.6 (42.1–77.1)90.6 (82.9–95.6)0.5340.6450.491
CA1250.824 (0.663–0.985)71.4 (53.7–85.4)70.4 (49.8–86.2)75.0 (34.9–96.8)90.5 (69.6–98.8)42.9 (17.7–71.1)0.3590.792
TEPOC+CA1250.917 (0.824–1.000)74.3 (56.7–87.5)66.7 (46.0–83.5)100.0 (63.1–100.0)100.0 (81.5–100.0)47.1 (23.0–72.2)0.4780.8000.284

Predictions of TEPOC and the combination model were compared with those of CA125 using a two-sided DeLong’s test (AUC P-value). Abbreviations: TEPOC, tumor-educated platelet-derived gene panel of ovarian cancer; CA125, cancer antigen 125; TEPOC+CA125, the combination of TEPOC and CA125; AUC, area under the curve; ACC, accuracy; SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close