Table 5 Open in new tab The performance...

Table 5

The performance comparison of the top-3 methods in Table 4 on independent test sets Test1185 and SL250. Bold fonts indicate the best results

Dataset	Method	\|${\text{AUC}}_{\text{ROC}}$\|	\|${\text{AUC}}_{\text{PR}}$\|	MCC	Sw
Test1185	SPOT-Disorder	0.894	0.650	0.567	0.477
	SPOT-Disorder2	0.914	0.698	0.607	0.676
	LMDisorder	0.920	0.709	0.624	0.692
SL250	SPOT-Disorder	0.893	0.875	0.629	0.567
	SPOT-Disorder2	0.901	0.889	0.679	0.625
	LMDisorder	0.905	0.890	0.679	0.634

Dataset	Method	\|${\text{AUC}}_{\text{ROC}}$\|	\|${\text{AUC}}_{\text{PR}}$\|	MCC	Sw
Test1185	SPOT-Disorder	0.894	0.650	0.567	0.477
	SPOT-Disorder2	0.914	0.698	0.607	0.676
	LMDisorder	0.920	0.709	0.624	0.692
SL250	SPOT-Disorder	0.893	0.875	0.629	0.567
	SPOT-Disorder2	0.901	0.889	0.679	0.625
	LMDisorder	0.905	0.890	0.679	0.634