The performance of the iDRPro-SC and StackDPPred on the test dataset PDB186 and PDB676
| Dataset . | Method . | ACC . | REC . | SP . | MCC . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB186 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.74 | |
| PDB676 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.72 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
| Dataset . | Method . | ACC . | REC . | SP . | MCC . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB186 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.74 | |
| PDB676 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.72 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
The performance of the iDRPro-SC and StackDPPred on the test dataset PDB186 and PDB676
| Dataset . | Method . | ACC . | REC . | SP . | MCC . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB186 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.74 | |
| PDB676 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.72 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
| Dataset . | Method . | ACC . | REC . | SP . | MCC . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB186 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.74 | |
| PDB676 | StackDPPred [7] | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.72 |
| iDRPro-SC | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
