Table 1.

Comparison of the predictive performance of nine representative predictors of PBRs on the benchmark dataset

PredictorAUC
Sensitivity
FPR (sensitivity to FPR rate)
FCPR (sensitivity to FCPR rate)
Dataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-protein
CRFPPI0.6830.7060.2710.261*0.113 [2.4]0.097= [2.7]0.204 [1.3]0.182* [1.4]
SSWRF0.6930.701=0.3110.295*0.113 [2.8]0.105= [2.8]0.210 [1.5]0.191* [1.5]
LORIS0.6570.671*0.2660.260*0.114 [2.3]0.109= [2.4]0.192 [1.4]0.167* [1.6]
SPRINGS0.6260.646*0.2340.219*0.120 [2.0]0.103= [2.1]0.235 [1.0]0.212* [1.0]
SCRIBER0.7170.635*0.3110.192*0.093 [3.3]0.046 [4.2]0.100 [3.1]0.000 [inf]
SPRINT0.5730.608*0.1870.156*0.128 [1.5]0.110= [1.4]0.379 [0.5]0.409* [0.4]
PSIVER0.5780.606*0.1920.157*0.128 [1.5]0.108= [1.5]0.251 [0.8]0.200* [0.8]
DeepPPISP0.6420.599*0.4770.5000.286 [1.7]0.360* [1.4]0.422 [1.1]0.500* [1.0]
SPPIDER0.5130.486*0.1980.125*0.132 [1.5]0.102= [1.2]0.323 [0.6]0.293* [0.4]
PredictorAUC
Sensitivity
FPR (sensitivity to FPR rate)
FCPR (sensitivity to FCPR rate)
Dataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-protein
CRFPPI0.6830.7060.2710.261*0.113 [2.4]0.097= [2.7]0.204 [1.3]0.182* [1.4]
SSWRF0.6930.701=0.3110.295*0.113 [2.8]0.105= [2.8]0.210 [1.5]0.191* [1.5]
LORIS0.6570.671*0.2660.260*0.114 [2.3]0.109= [2.4]0.192 [1.4]0.167* [1.6]
SPRINGS0.6260.646*0.2340.219*0.120 [2.0]0.103= [2.1]0.235 [1.0]0.212* [1.0]
SCRIBER0.7170.635*0.3110.192*0.093 [3.3]0.046 [4.2]0.100 [3.1]0.000 [inf]
SPRINT0.5730.608*0.1870.156*0.128 [1.5]0.110= [1.4]0.379 [0.5]0.409* [0.4]
PSIVER0.5780.606*0.1920.157*0.128 [1.5]0.108= [1.5]0.251 [0.8]0.200* [0.8]
DeepPPISP0.6420.599*0.4770.5000.286 [1.7]0.360* [1.4]0.422 [1.1]0.500* [1.0]
SPPIDER0.5130.486*0.1980.125*0.132 [1.5]0.102= [1.2]0.323 [0.6]0.293* [0.4]

Note: The methods are sorted by their median per-protein AUC values in the descending order. Methods indicated in bold font provide the best value of a given measure of predictive performance. We report medians of the per-protein values and assess significance of the differences between the per-protein values of the best method and each of the other methods.

*

Statistically significant differences (P-value <0.001), while ‘=’ denotes differences that are not significant (P-value ≥ 0.001). We use paired t-test (for normal data) or Wilcoxon test (otherwise) and we assess normality with the Kolmogorov−Smirnov test.

Table 1.

Comparison of the predictive performance of nine representative predictors of PBRs on the benchmark dataset

PredictorAUC
Sensitivity
FPR (sensitivity to FPR rate)
FCPR (sensitivity to FCPR rate)
Dataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-protein
CRFPPI0.6830.7060.2710.261*0.113 [2.4]0.097= [2.7]0.204 [1.3]0.182* [1.4]
SSWRF0.6930.701=0.3110.295*0.113 [2.8]0.105= [2.8]0.210 [1.5]0.191* [1.5]
LORIS0.6570.671*0.2660.260*0.114 [2.3]0.109= [2.4]0.192 [1.4]0.167* [1.6]
SPRINGS0.6260.646*0.2340.219*0.120 [2.0]0.103= [2.1]0.235 [1.0]0.212* [1.0]
SCRIBER0.7170.635*0.3110.192*0.093 [3.3]0.046 [4.2]0.100 [3.1]0.000 [inf]
SPRINT0.5730.608*0.1870.156*0.128 [1.5]0.110= [1.4]0.379 [0.5]0.409* [0.4]
PSIVER0.5780.606*0.1920.157*0.128 [1.5]0.108= [1.5]0.251 [0.8]0.200* [0.8]
DeepPPISP0.6420.599*0.4770.5000.286 [1.7]0.360* [1.4]0.422 [1.1]0.500* [1.0]
SPPIDER0.5130.486*0.1980.125*0.132 [1.5]0.102= [1.2]0.323 [0.6]0.293* [0.4]
PredictorAUC
Sensitivity
FPR (sensitivity to FPR rate)
FCPR (sensitivity to FCPR rate)
Dataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-proteinDataset-levelMedian per-protein
CRFPPI0.6830.7060.2710.261*0.113 [2.4]0.097= [2.7]0.204 [1.3]0.182* [1.4]
SSWRF0.6930.701=0.3110.295*0.113 [2.8]0.105= [2.8]0.210 [1.5]0.191* [1.5]
LORIS0.6570.671*0.2660.260*0.114 [2.3]0.109= [2.4]0.192 [1.4]0.167* [1.6]
SPRINGS0.6260.646*0.2340.219*0.120 [2.0]0.103= [2.1]0.235 [1.0]0.212* [1.0]
SCRIBER0.7170.635*0.3110.192*0.093 [3.3]0.046 [4.2]0.100 [3.1]0.000 [inf]
SPRINT0.5730.608*0.1870.156*0.128 [1.5]0.110= [1.4]0.379 [0.5]0.409* [0.4]
PSIVER0.5780.606*0.1920.157*0.128 [1.5]0.108= [1.5]0.251 [0.8]0.200* [0.8]
DeepPPISP0.6420.599*0.4770.5000.286 [1.7]0.360* [1.4]0.422 [1.1]0.500* [1.0]
SPPIDER0.5130.486*0.1980.125*0.132 [1.5]0.102= [1.2]0.323 [0.6]0.293* [0.4]

Note: The methods are sorted by their median per-protein AUC values in the descending order. Methods indicated in bold font provide the best value of a given measure of predictive performance. We report medians of the per-protein values and assess significance of the differences between the per-protein values of the best method and each of the other methods.

*

Statistically significant differences (P-value <0.001), while ‘=’ denotes differences that are not significant (P-value ≥ 0.001). We use paired t-test (for normal data) or Wilcoxon test (otherwise) and we assess normality with the Kolmogorov−Smirnov test.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close