Table 6.
Open in new tab

Comparison of the Bayes evidence from three global photometric fits, where only the TESS detrending was varied. The difference in Bayes evidence (dlnZ) between each fit and the original joint Matérn-3/2 (M32) fit is quoted, indicating a decisive preference for the fits incorporating a simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) kernel (Kass & Raftery 1995).

TESS detrending modeldlnZ
Joint M32 + SHO GP + 106.8
Sector 4 M32 + SHO GP, Sector 31 M32 GP + 89.2
Joint M32 GP0.0
TESS detrending modeldlnZ
Joint M32 + SHO GP + 106.8
Sector 4 M32 + SHO GP, Sector 31 M32 GP + 89.2
Joint M32 GP0.0
Table 6.
Open in new tab

Comparison of the Bayes evidence from three global photometric fits, where only the TESS detrending was varied. The difference in Bayes evidence (dlnZ) between each fit and the original joint Matérn-3/2 (M32) fit is quoted, indicating a decisive preference for the fits incorporating a simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) kernel (Kass & Raftery 1995).

TESS detrending modeldlnZ
Joint M32 + SHO GP + 106.8
Sector 4 M32 + SHO GP, Sector 31 M32 GP + 89.2
Joint M32 GP0.0
TESS detrending modeldlnZ
Joint M32 + SHO GP + 106.8
Sector 4 M32 + SHO GP, Sector 31 M32 GP + 89.2
Joint M32 GP0.0
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close